Jump to content

Australian researchers lay bare bloody history of colonial massacres


webfact

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, The Deerhunter said:

The Australian aboriginals were not confined to reservations.  They were hunted, shot and killed; simply exterminated really, over a large percentage of the country.  Disgraceful and still shameful.

I agree,

 

But of course they were restricted to 'Reserves' or' Missions'

 

They were only bought under Federal electoral law in 1967 when the average decent Aussie had had enough and we are,on the whole,a decent fair minded people...

 

 

Edited by Odysseus123
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Thaidream said:

I am not advocating money; guilt; or going back in time to change things.

 

However, a country has to look at its own History- whether it's Australia or the United States and learn from that History and admit when it is wrong.  Basic morality does not change-  murder is always murder and wrong;  raping and pillaging is always wrong and so on.  The facts are quite clear. 

All mankind should look at examples in their History and vow not to repeat them. Unfortunately, History is replete with examples and often does repeat itself because people of good conscience do not speak up,,,,

You me and the population in general have no say in it. 

It's the governments/politicians in charge who can change things. But if anyone believes they have anything else in mind other than lining their own pockets then I don't how to answer any other way.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/27/2018 at 12:46 PM, mfd101 said:

(1) Most of this is not new. Henry Reynolds and many other respectable Australian historians have been writing about various killings and massacres in C19th Oz for over 30 years. The notion that Oz continues to wrestle with and struggle with its bloody colonial past is mostly melodramatic nonsense. Probably most Australians couldn't care less.

 

(2) Billions upon billions of dollars have been spent on Aboriginal welfare, infrastructure, education and employment since 1967, with quite limited positive outcomes. Where there has been real & lasting improvements is where Aboriginal leaders (such as Noel Pearson in Cape York) have themselves taken action and led their people forward to self-sufficiency, education, & drug control, away from the usual dependence on government handouts which the welfare industry breeds everywhere in the world. As usual, local action trumps central government any day. THINK GLOBAL, ACT LOCAL.

Well said, the reason for the poor socio economic status of our indigenous is the notion that we should allow them to live in the Bush where there is limited and expensive infrastructure and no work. 

Send them to the areas where there is work and shut down the towns where they sit on the dole. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, overherebc said:

Agree. Everytime I meet someone from Germany should I start thinking about my uncles who killed Germans in WW2 and ask them if they feel it's terrible and how can I make the world better because I know my uncles' history. Forgot, they both fought in Italy as well, must give my Italian friend an extra plate of spag' bol' to make everything better.

No German has apologized for killing my aunt and great-grandfather in The Netherlands either.... and stealing all my family's food, leaving them virtually starving for nearly 5 years. The Japanese have yet to apologize for killing many of my wife's family members in the Philippines during the early 1940's. Bayonetting babies was a sport for them. Despite this, I have no ill will towards either nationality.

Edited by tropo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Odysseus123 said:

I agree,

 

But of course they were restricted to 'Reserves' or' Missions'

 

They were only bought under Federal electoral law in 1967 when the average decent Aussie had had enough and we are,on the whole,a decent fair minded people...

 

 

I agree with you. It is a very sad national legacy.  "The beds are burning" still  brings tears to mu eyes each time I hear it: And I am not even an Aussie. I am 1200 miles away from being one.  My country did some terrible things too but in the words of Peter Garrett "It is not even close to being the same."

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tropo said:

No German has apologized for killing my aunt and great-grandfather in The Netherlands either.... and stealing all my family's food, leaving them virtually starving for nearly 5 years. The Japanese have yet to apologize for killing many of my wife's family members in the Philippines during the early 1940's. Bayonetting babies was sport for them.

Did you ever read Nancy Chang''s book about the rape of Nanking in the 30's?  I started but could not finish it.  Appalling stuff. Bayonetting babies and pregnant women and beheading competitions for officers.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, The Deerhunter said:

Did you ever read Nancy Chang''s book about the rape of Nanking in the 30's?  I started but could not finish it.  Appalling stuff. Bayonetting babies and pregnant women and beheading competitions for officers.

No, I haven't read that. The younger generations in the Philippines welcome the Japanese. They are mostly unaware of what happened during WW2. I don't think they teach much of it in the schools.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, tropo said:

No, I haven't read that. The younger generations in the Philippines welcome the Japanese. They are mostly unaware of what happened during WW2. I don't think they teach much of it in the schools.

War crimes, mass murders by civilian groups are things of the past, things of now and no doubt will be things of the future.

No amount of education and knowledge of such things in the past or the present will stop them in the future. It's in our nature, it's part of our make up.

The fact that we can think about it and discuss/argue about it doesn't make us better than those in the past.

For me, it's going to or it's getting worse as population numbers are growing out of control and living space for eveyone gets smaller.

People are shooting each other over parking places for christs sake.

Civilisation is word, it's not a reality.

People are killing each because they are taking revenge on past actions, actions that took place before they were born. Where does that sit with educating people about massacres in the distant past.

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, tropo said:

No, I haven't read that. The younger generations in the Philippines welcome the Japanese. They are mostly unaware of what happened during WW2. I don't think they teach much of it in the schools.

Of course not.  Japan is the dominant regional economy.  It makes no sense to harp on about their excesses of 80 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, tropo said:

No German has apologized for killing my aunt and great-grandfather in The Netherlands either.... and stealing all my family's food, leaving them virtually starving for nearly 5 years. The Japanese have yet to apologize for killing many of my wife's family members in the Philippines during the early 1940's. Bayonetting babies was a sport for them. Despite this, I have no ill will towards either nationality.

Whataboutary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, The Deerhunter said:

Did you ever read Nancy Chang''s book about the rape of Nanking in the 30's?  I started but could not finish it.  Appalling stuff. Bayonetting babies and pregnant women and beheading competitions for officers.

I read it and was horrified at what I read.

 

IMO there is a difference between killing people when fighting a war and what the Japanese did to the Chinese civilians and soldiers...…….the bayoneting of babies for sport, ripping unborn children out with bayonets, using them and civilians for target practice and much more senseless brutality. 

 

The writer of the book (Iris Chang) who was American/Chinese committed suicide a few years after its publication because she could not live with what she discovered and also because of persecution and hate-mail from Japanese ultra-nationalists.

 

I also saw a documentary about it and a film starring Christian Bale, called The Flowers of War, which was based on a novel and featured aspects of that era and the atrocities in it.

 

 Terrible stuff...…...not a war, but like nothing you could have ever seen or imagined.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, The Deerhunter said:

They all died in a massacre 100 years ago.  No 555 allowed!!!  Where is Peter Garrett these days? Still.burning the "Green" Midnight Oil?

I thought he changed his name to Dutton. :cheesy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, xylophone said:

I read it and was horrified at what I read.

 

IMO there is a difference between killing people when fighting a war and what the Japanese did to the Chinese civilians and soldiers...…….the bayoneting of babies for sport, ripping unborn children out with bayonets, using them and civilians for target practice and much more senseless brutality. 

 

The writer of the book (Iris Chang) who was American/Chinese committed suicide a few years after its publication because she could not live with what she discovered and also because of persecution and hate-mail from Japanese ultra-nationalists.

 

I also saw a documentary about it and a film starring Christian Bale, called The Flowers of War, which was based on a novel and featured aspects of that era and the atrocities in it.

 

 Terrible stuff...…...not a war, but like nothing you could have ever seen or imagined.

My classroom was in Jinling college with Minnie Vautrin's memorial out the front.  It was she and the local Nazi official who kept the Japs away from the women.

Try watching the Children of Huangshi.  About a real man called George Hogg.

The reason they were killing them was because the Chinese soldiers were playing guerillas and hiding amongst the civilians at other times and slaughtering the Japs at will.  This doesn't justify the Japanese but it is a complex story about the desire of the Japanese to conquer Manchuria.  War is always full of atrocities by both the good guys and the bad guys.  All we can really do is to try and stop a repetition.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Whataboutary.

OK, you're trying to look smart. If you're going to leave a one-word reply, why not make an effort to spell that one world correctly. 555555

 

Apart from spelling it wrong (it's whataboutEry), I was not responding to a question or an accusation, therefore "whataboutery" is irrelevant.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, The Deerhunter said:

Of course not.  Japan is the dominant regional economy.  It makes no sense to harp on about their excesses of 80 years ago.

Of course. I'm not complaining that they are not harping on about the wrongs committed by the Japanese 80 years ago... it's just how it is. Not all wronged people spend the rest of their natural lives complaining about how their predecessors were wronged. Japan has directly donated a lot of money to the Philippines to improve infrastructure over the years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/29/2018 at 12:18 PM, car720 said:

I thought he changed his name to Dutton. :cheesy:

Who?  Dexter Dutton?  As in Life with Dexter?   (Steam Radio from the late 50's eary 60's.)  Apart from that as a guess  if it not wha you mean, then it is a bit to subtle for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/27/2018 at 6:42 AM, robblok said:

Almost every country has done some bad things in the past, the Dutch in Indonesia and other place, the Americans, wiping out the native Americans (one of the first times where disease was used to kill giving infected blankets to the native Americans). The Belgians in the Kongo, the Germans and French and Italians in their colonies.  But if you go back even further then almost all bigger empires are build by conquest it was the norm back then. So do we still have to feel guilty that is the question. Not so sure as I as a Dutch guy feel not responsible for what others have done in the past. 


But the Dutch massacres in Indonesia (and Belgium in the Kongo) are not the same as the genocide in Australia and America, surely ?

Holland and Belgium killed people, and then got out of the place. In Australia and America, genocide took place, and the land was taken permanently.  The ones who did the mass killings are still there today, with the the land they took.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/27/2018 at 10:43 AM, TPI said:

You can hear the whine starting already......More money, more money, more money! This is what Ms Hansen said 30 years ago was the problem with our "sun tanned brothers and sisters"! It's a problem that combines the historical low level IQ's of the Aboriginals with SJW's who specialise in "Gender Studies".....All the problems will go away, all the sins of the past will be wiped clean, things will be just peachy, if they only give us more money!  


How can I put this ?  If a bunch of foreigners turned up in Britain and carried out mass murder and genocide, how would I feel ?

Them outsiders giving me some money (welfare, social security, government benefits, etc) is actually not enough.  How about they give me my country back, and go back to where they're from ?  They're keeping the land they took, and I'm suppose to be grateful because they're giving me some dole money ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, tonbridgebrit said:


How can I put this ?  If a bunch of foreigners turned up in Britain and carried out mass murder and genocide, how would I feel ?

Them outsiders giving me some money (welfare, social security, government benefits, etc) is actually not enough.  How about they give me my country back, and go back to where they're from ?  They're keeping the land they took, and I'm suppose to be grateful because they're giving me some dole money ??

I don't support any type of mass murder or genocide, but it's what happens when two cultures come into contact and one is more dominant/stronger or advanced.  I think we need to keep in mind that neither the Americas or Australia were countries.   These were groups of people with no declared border.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎7‎/‎28‎/‎2018 at 12:40 AM, Tchooptip said:

Right, but at the same time, some in those countries do not hesitate to say daily that as heir, we Westerners are all guilty...and as so we should pay! 

My ancestors were in a country that was itself persecuted by the English and many massacres carried out on the local population. Should I as a western person have to feel guilty about things done by other races and not by my ancestral race?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, tonbridgebrit said:


How can I put this ?  If a bunch of foreigners turned up in Britain and carried out mass murder and genocide, how would I feel ?

Them outsiders giving me some money (welfare, social security, government benefits, etc) is actually not enough.  How about they give me my country back, and go back to where they're from ?  They're keeping the land they took, and I'm suppose to be grateful because they're giving me some dole money ??

Given that everyone on the planet originated in Africa, no one has a claim to own Australia. Some just got there before others.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

My ancestors were in a country that was itself persecuted by the English and many massacres carried out on the local population. Should I as a western person have to feel guilty about things done by other races and not by my ancestral race?

Are the British still there running the place?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

What relevance does that have to me feeling guilty ( or not ) about attrocities carried out in Australia? I was responding to the poster saying all westerners should feel guilty.

Because the atrocities underpin the takeover of the country and the suppression of the indigenous people.

 

And who said you should ‘feel guilty’?

 

Doh!

Edited by Chomper Higgot
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/27/2018 at 9:52 PM, sirineou said:

That some people might use history to promote their agenda is inevitable IMO the only defence is an educated public, remember ,I said  a "honest " look.

  Politics are always part of the problem, and sometimes part of the solution, they are part of the human condition and should not deter as from honest retrospective,

Apparently you don't have any children in an American college or university at present. Imagine if your half caste child returned from university after attending 14 years of international schools in Thailand to tell you about what your "white privelege" has wrought. Never mind they are the most priveleged children on the planet or that I grew up in the only white family in the projects or that I sold my blood plasma to buy textbooks, that is what they are being taught. Not in any specific class either, but I'm told almost every professor takes 10-15 minutes of every class period to impart their political opinions to the class (all tenured of course). These are in 2 of the top 20 universities in the world. It is never, ever going to end.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...