webfact Posted December 5, 2018 Share Posted December 5, 2018 Putin: Russia will make banned missiles if U.S. exits arms treaty Russia's President Vladimir Putin speaks during a joint news conference with Argentina's President Mauricio Macri at the Casa Rosada Presidential Palace in Buenos Aires, Argentina December 1, 2018. REUTERS/Marcos Brindicci MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia will develop missiles now banned under the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces treaty if the United States exits the arms control pact and starts making such weapons, President VladimirPutin said on Wednesday. The United States delivered Russia a 60-day ultimatum on Tuesday to come clean about what Washington says is a violation of the 1987 nuclear arms control treaty, saying it would be forced to start a six-month process of withdrawal if nothing changes. Putin, in televised comments, accused the United States of blaming Russia for violations as a pretext for Washington to exit the pact. Putin noted that many countries produce missiles banned under the INF treaty, but that Moscow and Washington had undertaken to limit themselves with the accord signed in 1987. "Now it seems our American partners believe that the situation has changed so much that the United States must also have such a weapon. What's our response? It's simple: in that case we will also do this," he said. (Reporting by Vladimir Soldatkin; writing by Tom Balmforth; Editing by Toby Chopra and Peter Graff) -- © Copyright Reuters 2018-12-06 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post manarak Posted December 5, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted December 5, 2018 (edited) an arms race is exactly what the US weapons industry wants. Edited December 5, 2018 by manarak 3 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IAMHERE Posted December 6, 2018 Share Posted December 6, 2018 Does it matter ? First off they probably already have those medium range missiles. Second: They have long range missiles that they just shoot not so far. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammieuk1 Posted December 6, 2018 Share Posted December 6, 2018 World leaders who needs them divine intervention please???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nice Boyd Posted December 6, 2018 Share Posted December 6, 2018 Who would trust Putiny, they will make them , Treaty or Not 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballpoint Posted December 6, 2018 Share Posted December 6, 2018 "We're going to win so much. You're gonna get tired of winning!" 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenl Posted December 6, 2018 Share Posted December 6, 2018 1 hour ago, IAMHERE said: Does it matter ? First off they probably already have those medium range missiles. Second: They have long range missiles that they just shoot not so far. Yes, it matters. An armsrace is good for the weapons industry, but not for anybody else. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
connda Posted December 6, 2018 Share Posted December 6, 2018 5 hours ago, manarak said: an arms race is exactly what the US weapons industry wants. Back to MAD. War is good for business, especially considering that the direct and indirect spending by Congress shuffles close to $1 trillion dollars a year into the military-security industries. Yep - never ending war is really, really good for business. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
connda Posted December 6, 2018 Share Posted December 6, 2018 What good are treaties? Let's pull out. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebike Posted December 6, 2018 Share Posted December 6, 2018 15 minutes ago, connda said: What good are treaties? Let's pull out. To me, your graph seems to indicate they DO work... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UncleTouchyFingers Posted December 6, 2018 Share Posted December 6, 2018 3 minutes ago, mikebike said: To me, your graph seems to indicate they DO work... Wut? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xMode Posted December 6, 2018 Share Posted December 6, 2018 most likely Putin's already making them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BestB Posted December 6, 2018 Share Posted December 6, 2018 Problem with US is that it goes around making ultimatums instead of negotiations. US making rules and imposes it’s decision on other country’s it will not not end well for US sooner or later Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebike Posted December 6, 2018 Share Posted December 6, 2018 (edited) 6 minutes ago, UncleTouchyFingers said: Wut? The treaty referenced in the OP seems to be near the nadir of the arms race in the graph and every treaty since seems to have continued the process of deproliferation right thru to 2017. What do you see? Edited December 6, 2018 by mikebike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike324 Posted December 6, 2018 Share Posted December 6, 2018 world leaders that need bigger dicks to prove themselves.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaksimMislavsky Posted December 6, 2018 Share Posted December 6, 2018 1 hour ago, connda said: Looks like the blue have started it all, but... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watcharacters Posted December 6, 2018 Share Posted December 6, 2018 Why not say "go ahead and make as many as you want". It's not as if there's not already enough nuclear bombs to destroy the planet already. Bring it on. What's the point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebike Posted December 6, 2018 Share Posted December 6, 2018 (edited) 5 minutes ago, watcharacters said: Why not say "go ahead and make as many as you want". It's not as if there's not already enough nuclear bombs to destroy the planet already. Bring it on. What's the point? I’d guess that “normalization” would be an issue. More proliferation, more normalization, more risk of their actually being used. Edited December 6, 2018 by mikebike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watcharacters Posted December 6, 2018 Share Posted December 6, 2018 50 minutes ago, mikebike said: I’d guess that “normalization” would be an issue. More proliferation, more normalization, more risk of their actually being used. I can't see the point of living in fear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebike Posted December 6, 2018 Share Posted December 6, 2018 8 minutes ago, watcharacters said: I can't see the point of living in fear. Why would anyone live in fear? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Nilats Posted December 6, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted December 6, 2018 It should be noted that the West( the United States) started the Arms race both times... back in 50-60s and this time as well... and each time they try to sell the story like the Russians started it... In this case - If there were no USA - nobody would be having any of these problems. NATO officials were first to make the announcement - Putin only made the only logical reply possible under the circumstances - now they are pretending like he's the one responsible... ???? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now