Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

13 reasons why ‘respect’ and ‘sympathy’ are very slippery words

By Tulsathit Taptim 
The Nation

 

opinion1.jpg

 

The avalanche of USA goals that buried Thailand at the Women’s World Cup was followed quickly by a social media blizzard. It told us much about human nature. 

 

Rather than congratulating USA players, many netizens complained about their excessive goal celebrations. One Thai commenter summed up the general feeling: it is fine to dominate a rival who is on the same level, but there’s something unnatural in gloating over the destruction of a much smaller opponent.

 

In the same way, we might adore dogs that are smarter than other dogs, but we fear or even despise dogs that are “as smart as us”. Dogs that will fetch you a beer from the fridge are “cute”; those that can play complicated tunes on the piano are disturbing.

 

The Thai team shipped 13 goals in the game, creating an unenviable record for both the men’s and women’s categories. While the winners were criticised for celebrating every goal “like they had won the final”, sympathy poured in for the losers. 

 

On the other hand, if a Thai player tweeted about meeting “the Prince of Whales”, netizens would chuckle at the typo or naivety. When Donald Trump tweeted exactly that a few days ago, the whole world had a laughing fit. (In truth, Trump has exhibited enough evidence that this may have been neither a typo nor mere naivety, but that’s exactly what I’m getting at.)

 

“Equality” is a slippery word. People who laughed at Trump may have failed to consider the fact that he is also a human, albeit one with access to nuclear launch codes. Those who lambasted the USA footballers for not showing mercy to the Thais may have failed to consider that showing mercy can be a form of insult.

 

Should the US team have shown “respect” to the fledging Thai players by going easy on them after scoring, say, eight goals? Or does “real respect” for an opponent require that athletes keep their foot on the pedal until the very end?

 

Many of the Thai players cried after the humiliation. Pictures of their tear-streaked faces inflamed criticism against the USA team. 

 

This made me think about the dog analogy. People showed sympathy for the Thais because they consider them inferior, harmless and in need of support. When Leicester City FC won the Premier League trophy a few years ago, it was a fairytale and love flooded in for the “tiny” club from all sides. Today, beating Leicester is a cause for big celebration.

 

Yet the Leicester of today are pretty much the same side that won the Premier League in the 2015-2016 season. Why have feelings towards them changed?

 

Politics is more or less the same. Had Trump tried to bounce back from his latest gaffe by proclaiming a social media “witch hunt” against him, the laughter would have multiplied. Some say such persecution is an infringement on the human rights of the president and those he represents.  

 

Now, let’s look at the opposite end of the political spectrum. Politicians, whether they are democratic or dictatorial, treat people like the beer-fetching dogs. They want them to be “a little bit smart” but not so smart that they cannot be controlled. Otherwise election campaigns would be a lot harder.

 

Human rights activists, meanwhile, should have done something regarding Trump. They should have protected either him or those whose interests he is supposed to protect. The activists’ silence is unsettling. Either they are ignoring his “right” to be wrong, or they don’t care about people governed by someone who can’t tell Whales from Wales.

 

Finding a response to the massive Thai defeat is difficult, but a group of Thai women seem to have found a way. Under the “Power of Women” banner, celebrities who are publicly encouraging the Thai footballers to fight on despite the risk of more embarrassment include BNK 48 heartthrob Cherprang Areekul, badminton star Ratchanok Intanon, football manager and businesswoman Nualphan Lamsam, TV idol Patcharasri Benjamas (Kalamare), and popular actress Pimchanok Luevisadpaibul.

 

Among the messages delivered by this group is that defeats on the field are outweighed by the pride they give the nation, and the strength to bear and recover from humiliation may be the greatest strength of all.

 

Writer’s note: This column was written before the Thailand-Sweden game on Sunday night. I’m adding this not because the scoreline in that match, 4-1 to the Swedes, showed a marked Thai improvement, but because in scoring their solitary goal at the end of the match, the Thai women showed defiance to get up off the floor. Bravo.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/opinion/30371341

 

thenation_logo.jpg

 

Posted (edited)

If Twitter or Tweet use pre-emptive spelling systems then maybe Trump typed Wales and the system changed it to Whales.

Don't use either myself so Just sayin'

Edited by overherebc
  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, inactiveposter said:

Overherebc, I think the word you wanted was “predictive” text, although pre-emptive has a connotation that may also fit. ????

 

It leans more to the warmonger side of things.

????

Posted

Not any word means a thing, if the person behind the words dont stand for it.

All words are slippery.

You can easily say, you have respect for someone and thinking: what a jackass, show off  

You say, you have sympathy for a loosing team and thinking: hey suckers, what are you crying, get out.  

I saw Trump, having no respect or sympathy, when a guy had to cough while HE was talking.

He probably isnt aware it can happen as we are all human. He thinks , he is above human.

If he had sympathy, he should have offered a glass of water and if he was respectful, he wouldnt have burned him down. But ok Trump probably doesnt have those words in his vocabulary and sure not acting.

There are lots of those people, they are also "leaders". They speak with double tongue.

 

WIth the USA winning with 13-0, ok why would you hold back? Its just a game, win some , loose some. Be joyful scoring, part of the game. Less joyfull scoring for 13th time, no why? 

It is sport, seeing who is best. Get a grip if you loose, and do next time better. That is what it is with competition in sports. Didnt Thailand once lost from USA with 9-0? You know what is coming.

Be prepared or go down, that is sport. 

Posted
On 6/19/2019 at 4:21 AM, webfact said:

In the same way, we might adore dogs that are smarter than other dogs, but we fear or even despise dogs that are “as smart as us”. Dogs that will fetch you a beer from the fridge are “cute”; those that can play complicated tunes on the piano are disturbing.

Absolutely no idea where he was going with this article. But if I ever encountered a dog who could knock out the first few bars of "Chopsticks", I'd be the one fetching him a beer from the fridge. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...