Jump to content

Compulsory insurance shelved: Ministry don't t want to spook tourists at sensitive time


Recommended Posts

Posted
19 minutes ago, webfact said:

He said that requiring tourists to have insurance was a "sensitive" matter that could "scare" tourists off at this time.

Just send the unfortunate ones back home in a box, POD.

  • Like 1
  • Heart-broken 2
Posted
7 hours ago, smedly said:

 

 

how many bus accidents will we have this week ? - seems like an average of 2x "reported"

would have been more but for the flooding...........:whistling:

  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, overherebc said:

I'm 50/50 on this.

I have insurance for here ( accident ) but even if we travel to other countries we always buy some kind of insurance.

I really don't understand those that come here from UK USA for example, on holiday who don't buy any insurance in any way.

Or buy it and don't read it re' falling off a rented bike etc when they don't even have a bike licence at home. Been a few stories on that on TV.

IMOP I oppose being "forced" or have laws that mandate a level of coverage. Most Americans who travel here have credit cards that cover accidental coverage.

https://upgradedpoints.com/best-credit-cards-for-travel-accident-insurance/

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

So is this article talking about the proposed insurance requirement for regular tourists, or the separate proposal to require health insurance for O-A visa applicants, or both?

 

 

I just knew it. always someone isn't there?

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, ezzra said:

Somehow i'm sue that there are number of people that these news are great disappointment for them, the same people who were looking forward to hit the big times with this harebrained idea, i wish the TM30 will follow suite quickly...

Why harebrained? This is probably one of the most sensible ideas that the government have come up with.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

So is this article talking about the proposed insurance requirement for regular tourists, or the separate proposal to require health insurance for O-A visa applicants, or both?

 

 

As it's about tourism I'm assuming it's the 100 baht surcharge on arrival.

 

Posted
2 hours ago, monkfish said:

So they recognised it's a bad idea that's good but their reasoning for shelving it isn't so good.
But will they reintroduce it once tourism picks up again?
 

Yes in 2050

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...