Jump to content

Trump communication with foreign leader prompted whistleblower complaint -Washington Post


Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, stevenl said:

So the inspector general is not objective. That's the only possible conclusion from your post.

He's surely a leftist! ????

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, elmrfudd said:

in your mind it is i guess. I guess you can ignore the previous claims made by others as to preconceived guilt and results, that would not be objective though

This is an official complaint from an intelligence person with close connections to POTUS, not some one with a political axe to grind.

Furthermore the Inspector General has deemed the complaint credible. Surely all need to await the outcome.

 

  • Thanks 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, elmrfudd said:

you mean the same crew of TVF leftists that have been after the same result for 3 years regardless of actual factual evidence and have been peddling assumptions and innuendos? like that "objectivity"??

 

the lack of objectivity is precisely the problem.

and some still believe there was no collusion no obstruction 555

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, elmrfudd said:

yes, good idea. then perhaps you can have a word with all the previous posters about the vacuous assumptions and presumptions of guilt. but then I do not see you asking about their "objectivity" at all, is that just an oversight?

 

Seems like it's you who is acting all offended? I wonder why?

 

Very few people here have posited that the president has done anything nefarious. Sure, it looks unusual, but hey, he dished to Lavrov in the Oval Office so what the heck.

 

I think most simply want the IC IG to release his report to Congress, as is proscribed by various rules and laws. Surely that's not unrealistic now is it?

 

I'm sure that call to Vladdy Daddy was really about Siberian Wildfires.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, RJRS1301 said:

This is an official complaint from an intelligence person with close connections to POTUS, not some one with a political axe to grind.

Furthermore the Inspector General has deemed the complaint credible. Surely all need to await the outcome.

 

when did I say we should not wait for the outcome?

Posted
37 minutes ago, elmrfudd said:

in your mind it is i guess. I guess you can ignore the previous claims made by others as to preconceived guilt and results, that would not be objective though

Just look at it a bit more objectively. Why do you think the inspector general considers the complaint credible?

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Verifiable true that the electoral college favours the republicans.

Verifiable true that this senate will not impeach Trump.

Yeah and his hardcore heavily armed supporters are going to storm the Whitehouse to keep him in power forever if he decides he is not going to leave. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, chokrai said:

Yeah and his hardcore heavily armed supporters are going to storm the Whitehouse to keep him in power forever if he decides he is not going to leave. 

Ok, so you agree with 2 claims in his post, disagree with 1 and find that reason to proclaim the full post nonsense.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Ok, so you agree with 2 claims in his post, disagree with 1 and find that reason to proclaim the full post nonsense.

Yeah you really got me there. 

Posted
6 hours ago, Berkshire said:

Although this could be a serious allegation, I wonder if it would even move the needle.  If Trump were to have offered Putin sanction relief in exchange for $1 billion to Trump's personal account, his supporters probably still won't care.  There is something seriously wrong with these people. 

 

 

6 hours ago, Berkshire said:

Although this could be a serious allegation, I wonder if it would even move the needle.  If Trump were to have offered Putin sanction relief in exchange for $1 billion to Trump's personal account, his supporters probably still won't care.  There is something seriously wrong with these people. 

More conspiracy theories

  • Haha 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Who needs conspiracy theories when we have a whistleblower report?

 

Lets see the report and the transcripts of its subject telephone call.

 

Wriggle all you wish, this isn’t going to be swept under the carpet.

The Post, which cited two former officials familiar with the matter, said it was not immediately clear which foreign leader Trump was speaking with or what he pledged to deliver

    A familiar accusation  by god knows who that are familiar with god knows what lol Your goin to get disappointed again by these gotcha moments, cheer up you'll get a better chance of fulfilling your fantasies in 2020

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Mavideol said:

and some still believe there was no collusion no obstruction 555

 

just like some still believe Hilary and Bill are innocent.

 

Even Mueller said there was no collusion.

  • Confused 2
  • Haha 1
Posted

Trump is doing exactly what he wanted to do, he is controlling the news cycle!  We're here talking about this "whistle blower"  rather than things that are important.  In the end he'll claim that he can say anything to anybody that he wants to and he has the power to "declassify" anything that he wants to.

 

Yeah, it would be nice to know but doubt that it is anything that is out of the norm for Trump!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...