Jump to content
Essential Maintenance Nov 28 :We'll need to put the forum into "Under Maintenance" mode from 9 PM to 1 AM (approx).GMT+7

Trump offered to pardon Assange if he cooperated over email leak, UK court hears


Recommended Posts

Posted

Trump offered to pardon Assange if he cooperated over email leak, UK court hears

 

2020-02-19T162925Z_1_LYNXMPEG1I1J3_RTROPTP_4_BRITAIN-ASSANGE.JPG

WikiLeaks' founder Julian Assange leaves Westminster Magistrates Court in London, Britain January 13, 2020. REUTERS/Simon Dawson/Files

 

LONDON (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump offered to pardon WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange if he said that Russia had nothing to do with WikiLeaks' publication of Democratic Party emails in 2016, a London court heard on Wednesday.

 

Assange appeared by videolink from prison as lawyers discussed the management of his hearing next week to decide whether he should be extradited to the United States.

 

At Westminster Magistrates' Court, Assange's barrister, Edward Fitzgerald, referred to a witness statement by former U.S. Republican congressman Dana Rohrabacher who had visited Assange in 2017, saying that he had been sent by the president to offer a pardon.

 

The pardon would come on the condition that Assange complied with the United States by saying that the Russians were not involved in the email leak that damaged Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign in 2016, Rohrabacher's statement said.

 

A White House spokeswoman, Stephanie Grisham, denied the assertion.

 

"The president barely knows Dana Rohrabacher other than he’s an ex-congressman. He’s never spoken to him on this subject or almost any subject. It is a complete fabrication and a total lie," she said.

 

Assange, 48, who spent seven years holed up in Ecuador's London embassy before he was dragged out last April, is wanted in the United States to face 18 counts including conspiring to hack government computers and violating an espionage law. He could spend decades behind bars if convicted there.

 

Almost a decade after his WikiLeaks website enraged Washington by leaking secret U.S. documents, Woolwich Crown Court in London will begin hearings on Monday - with Assange present - to decide whether he should be sent to the United States.

 

At Wednesday's hearing, Assange spoke only to confirm his name and date of birth. He appeared relaxed and spent much of the hearing reading notes in his lap. He wore two pairs of glasses: one on top of his head and another which he took on and off and twiddled in his hands.

 

The Australian-born Assange made global headlines in early 2010 when WikiLeaks published a classified U.S. military video showing a 2007 attack by Apache helicopters in Baghdad that killed a dozen people, including two Reuters news staff.

 

WikiLeaks later angered the United States by publishing caches of leaked military documents and diplomatic cables.

 

The full extradition hearing will be split in two parts, with the second half delayed until May.

 

(Reporting by Elizabeth Howcroft in London and Steve Holland in Washington; Editing by Stephen Addison/Mark Heinrich)

 

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2020-02-20
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 2
Posted

 

 

 

 

Strange that Trump is will so quickly to pardon Assange and not Jonathan Jay Pollard, a former intelligence analyst, who spied for Israel and has completed his jail term as a part of plea bargaining, and yet Obama and Trump, a staunch supporter if Israel refuses to let him leave the US to go live in Israel...

  • Confused 3
  • Sad 1
Posted
56 minutes ago, ezzra said:

 

 

 

 

Strange that Trump is will so quickly to pardon Assange and not Jonathan Jay Pollard, a former intelligence analyst, who spied for Israel and has completed his jail term as a part of plea bargaining, and yet Obama and Trump, a staunch supporter if Israel refuses to let him leave the US to go live in Israel...

Assange is not stupid re being pardoned. He knows POTUS lies every time he opens his mouth.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 3
  • Sad 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, luckyluke said:

For an innocent man the experience to be falsely accused must be  traumatic. 

 

For a guilty man being acquited must be an incredible ego boost. 

 

 

 

 

It must likewise be an incredible kick in the balls to find that the law has spoken clearly against one's position, leaving such a person with nothing else to to but moan about how justice makes him unhappy. Justice which has been found within the highest law in the land, and in accordance with the Constitution of the United States.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, WalkingOrders said:

It must likewise be an incredible kick in the balls to find that the law has spoken clearly against one's position, leaving such a person with nothing else to to but moan about how justice makes him unhappy. Justice which has been found within the highest law in the land, and in accordance with the Constitution of the United States.

Precisely which law has spoken?

  • Haha 2
Posted
23 minutes ago, Boon Mee said:

Sounds like more Fake News like Bill Barr is going to quit because of Trump's tweets. 

Yep, that fake news came from Billy Barr.

 

Barr is is going nowhere, he needs a pardon and he’s fool enough to believe Trump will give him one.

 

He needs to listen to Assange.

 

Manafort and Flynn will help focus his thinking

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, WalkingOrders said:

The Impeachment Trial that happened in the Senate held in accordance with the Constitution of the United States of America which found him Not Guilty of Two charges. That law. The highest law of the land. Clear enough?

Trump was acquired under a Impeachment Trial governed by ‘Senate Impeachment rules’. 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

And on subject  I dont think Assange should be pardoned, I think he should come to the USA, be released on bail, tried, plea bargained, if guilty given credit for time served, and sentence communited by the President if given jailtime.

I think assange has done enough time.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, Paul Henry said:

All a pack of lies. We have on record numerous comments of the good work WIKILEAKS did by Trump.Then Trump stating I don"t know WikiLeaks never had anything to do with them .Never heard of Julius Assange what does he do? No don't know him or WikiLeaks". So who do we believe.? The one term president of the USA, WikiLeakes, Assange, the military, the security investigators or the "Fake Media"?

The scales of JUSTICE will balance in November. The ASmarican people will have their say.

Wow, you read a lot into that article that I couldn't find.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Announcements





×
×
  • Create New...