Jump to content

Thailand reports sharp fall in new COVID-19 cases


Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, DrTuner said:

Might have something to do with this being Thai Visa Forum and people living in Thailand.

Btw the "finger point" reference was a bit of sarcasm which may have gone unnoticed 

 

Posted
26 minutes ago, GAZZPA said:

oh dear, what does that tell everyone?

 

Some on here will likely see that as good news. Lower numbers...some actually at zero.

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, BobbyL said:

It certainly seems that some of the scientific research released recently around temperature and humidity restricting the spread is true. 

I would like to believe that also but, my understanding of germs, viruses and other such nasties, is that hot and humid helps them multiply. ????

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, pmh2009 said:

Look unless you have tested everyone or at least tried...like Germany - who tests 500K per week.. whatever data or numbers you have and say  are irrelevant!!! Let say you only test 3 million out of a population of 69 million --- what is the percentage of that is correct???? Just because the infected cases go down does not mean that the VIRUS is dissipating or clearing up!!!!!!

Thailand have tested roughly 1 in every 2700 of the population
A total of 25,000 tests
or

359/1,000,000

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Thailand said:

No updates since 16th February?

None that I have found. The criteria clearly matches the daily reports, would you agree?

 

I'll take a looksee at the current docs: https://ddc.moph.go.th/viralpneumonia/guidelines.php

 

EDIT: found one from March: https://ddc.moph.go.th/viralpneumonia/eng/file/guidelines/G_PUIdefinition.pdf

 

They seem to have added '4) Unidentified cause' to 'Scenario 3 Hospital-based surveillance: Patient with pneumonia'

 

That's a bit better, doesn't have to be severe.

Edited by DrTuner
Posted
2 hours ago, cornishcarlos said:

The 1% have seen their revenues being affected more than they imagined, so time to reverse the figures and get the money train rolling once more...

If it was only the general population suffering financial hardships, there would be no need to relax the control but.....

Maybe I'm just being cynical ??

Yes, I think you are. This virus has proved already it hits everyone. It doesn't care if you're rich or poor, a villager with no connection to anyone or the prince of Wales / prime minister of the great UK 

  • Haha 1
Posted

I doubt the figures. However if hospitals were filling up and people dying in great numbers, it would be all over social media. This is not happening, so hopefully Thailand is not hurt that bad. 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Gulfsailor said:

You’re understanding is then flawed. 

In general virusses don’t survive long in high temperatures and humidity. From a recent research paper published in the Lancet on specifically Sars-Cov2. 

 

F4EE054E-BDDA-4177-A8D2-DCA6CF941E33.png.529e600c9f7891b056f42e6f6df3746b.png

 

 whereas in the sun in Thailand it would be dead within minutes. So the only places to get infected in Thailand are inside air conditioned areas, or by directly being coughed or breathed into ones face by an infected person. 

In the shade 37 degrees is what Thailand often has. That column shows up to one day. Plenty of opportunities to transfer. Care to link the actual Lancet article?

Posted
13 minutes ago, Jimbo2014 said:

It should also be noted that Thailand has one of the lowest per capita test rates in the world and that existing tests have a 20-30% false negative rate.  https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

And also note worldometers uses the PUI count, not the number of tested, which is not available at all. Their source is probably https://data.go.th/en/dataset/covid-19-daily , the source of which is MoPH.

  • Like 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, Alidiver said:
3 hours ago, hydraides said:

That's because they are testing hardly anyone. How many thai's can splash out on 5000 baht test?

 

That's a whole month salary compensation from the government

My Thai neighbour had a sore throat for two weeks and I suggested it was a virus as the antibiotics had not cured it, so she got tested. It cost her 8,500. For a Farang it's 17,000.
The result was negative

still... it is crazy why the high costs? - for a sample/tesat procedure now equating to an assembly line of Model T Fords...

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, DrTuner said:

In the shade 37 degrees is what Thailand often has. That column shows up to one day. Plenty of opportunities to transfer. Care to link the actual Lancet article?

In the test the virus is first incubated for 14 days and underwent a treatment to make it stronger. So the likely times in the real world are shorter. 

 

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(20)30003-3/fulltext

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

I would hope it's true but...

If it is true then the NEXT BREAKING NEWS will be TAT reports hotel reservations for May & June up by 80% ha.

Edited by TKDfella
Posted

and what's sad is that if someone suffers it, and eventually self-recovers...

and goes home and announces he survived the virus

 - he could be arrested/fined? for spreading so called fake news!

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Dogmatix said:

Even if the warmer Southeast Asian climate inhibits the spread of the virus, which similarly low infection rates in Indonesia and the Philippines might support, it is odd that the mortality rate and absolute number of deaths is so much less than those two countries. Malaysia also has a significantly higher number of cases per capita which is probably explained by more widespread testing.

 

The coming rainy season could be a risk factor, as that is traditionally the flu season in Thailand.

Indonesia announces biggest daily rise in COVID-19 cases, 24 doctors now dead - CNA If this article is correct then not really

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
56 minutes ago, GAZZPA said:

Dont be so sure about that. I live in the UK, there 67 million people here. The testing is pretty high (200k) and the numbers are rapidly increasing, however I only know of 1 person that was tested as positive for the virus after he got sick. After that I have not heard of anyone with the virus and I am just North of London. In a population of 67 million it really has to spread in the hundreds of thousands or even millions before you will likely know of lots of people with it... So if you're logic is I "haven't heard of anyway falling over in the streets and none of the people I know have got it" then you need to think again...

Me too, I am in the UK now as we sit with 50,000 cases. I only know of 3 people who have had the virus, and they are all linked due to being the same family. I only know of them as they are clients of my Father. If you think about it, 50,000 out of let's say 65 million equates to 1,340. So on average you'd need to know 1,340 people to know one infection 

Edited by Mung
  • Like 1
Posted

Fake news. Love the way they try to pull the wool over everyone’s eyes with numbers that don’t add up for a huge population and several borders, plus many not staying home and social distancing. 

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...