In London skirmishes, suspected far-right protester is rescued

[Bluespunk]

1 minute ago, nauseus said:

Last week.

Already answered this fictional representation of the BLM protests. 

Edited June 14, 2020 by Bluespunk

[evadgib]

55 minutes ago, steven100 said:

Unbelievable that they let these BLM run riot. The police need to restore law & order.

One of the chants aimed at plod yesterday was "Where the F*** were you last week?"

[nauseus]

2 hours ago, robblok said:

That is the police its job, and if the black lives matter had a city permit to go there then they were in their right. No need to take the law into your own hands. 

No permits - it's all illegal right now.

[nauseus]

1 hour ago, Bluespunk said:

That's an idiot setting fire to a flag, it's not BLM attacking London.

 

One of your idiots. Attacking a monument which is physically long part of London as well as aggravating further trouble.

[RuamRudy]

15 minutes ago, vogie said:

With all due respects your posts do seem a tad one sided, can't remember you criticising last weeks screaming banshees..

If I were to attain your balanced and entirely non-partisan approach to life, would I see nirvana from there?

[nauseus]

1 hour ago, Bluespunk said:

I watched the news and didn't see any rampage or attack on London.

 

There was some acts of idiocy, but nothing like the violence exhibited by those 'defending rights of statues' yesterday  

These Australian journalists would not agree with you:

 

 

 

 

[Bluespunk]

5 minutes ago, nauseus said:

One of your idiots. Attacking a monument which is physically long part of London as well as aggravating further trouble.

Not mine, and that was not an attack by BLM.

 

It was the behaviour of an idiot.

[CorpusChristie]

9 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Already answered this fictional representation of the BLM protests. 

How did 49 Police officers get injured last week in London ?

[Bluespunk]

2 minutes ago, nauseus said:

These Australian journalists would not agree with you:

 

 

 

 

Not seeing any rampage or a BLM orchestrated attack...

[Bluespunk]

Just now, CorpusChristie said:

How did 49 Police officers get injured last week in London ?

Police were injured but that still does not make the BLM protests against racism and inequality an attack.

[nauseus]

38 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

Men defending Churchill's statue from literally nobody while giving nazi salutes and attacking police officers - you couldn't make it up. 

You did OK.

[herfiehandbag]

5 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

If I were to attain your balanced and entirely non-partisan approach to life, would I see nirvana from there?

You might, possibly, see both sides of an argument...

[RuamRudy]

2 minutes ago, nauseus said:

41 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

Men defending Churchill's statue from literally nobody while giving nazi salutes and attacking police officers - you couldn't make it up. 

You did OK.

 Man defending men defending Churchill's statue from literally nobody while giving nazi salutes and attacking police officers - you couldn't make it up. 

 

[CorpusChristie]

1 minute ago, Bluespunk said:

Police were injured but that still does not make the BLM protests against racism and inequality an attack.

There were attacks on the Police , property, war memorials , statues, the public , yes the protest wasnt an attack, but protestors did carry our numerous attacks and that was the reason for the counter protests yesterday

[nauseus]

6 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Not mine, and that was not an attack by BLM.

 

It was the behaviour of an idiot.

BLM.

[RuamRudy]

2 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

You might, possibly, see both sides of an argument...

While I understand your point, I am not convinced that the actual position I was referring to would allow me to do that. 

[CorpusChristie]

1 minute ago, RuamRudy said:

 Man defending men defending Churchill's statue from literally nobody while giving nazi salutes and attacking police officers - you couldn't make it up. 

 

Somebody probably did make that up . 

[Bluespunk]

Just now, CorpusChristie said:

There were attacks on the Police , property, war memorials , statues, the public , yes the protest wasnt an attack, but protestors did carry our numerous attacks and that was the reason for the counter protests yesterday

Glad you finally admit there was not an attack on London.

 

The reasons for yesterdays thuggery by the far right have their roots in a much more prejudice laden philosophy

[johnnybangkok]

It seems many of the posters hear absolutely agree with these racist thugs so I suspect you hold similar views so I won't engage. People who hold such extreme views are never going to change, so why bother.

The facts though, as usual, are the facts.

Once they heard about the counter protests, BLM called off it's demostration and advised people not to gather in London, knowing these men were there to start trouble https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jun/11/blm-organisers-call-off-london-event-to-prevent-clashes-with-far-right. This was followed by The London Antifascist Assembly (LAFA) calling off theirs.

The 'counter protestors' under the excuse of protecting statues, were from the EDL, Britain First, football hooligan groups and the far-right https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-53037767. They were itching for a fight and started on the police https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jun/13/rightwing-protesters-clash-with-police-in-central-london before running around trying to find the small BLM groups who did decide to protest. They initiated all of the trouble, caused all the injuries to the police and harrassed/attacked peaceful protestors and innocent people who were just passing by or having a picnic https://www.msn.com/en-us/video/news/2-pm-market-minute/vi-AAEUmSz.

If you support this kind of 'demonstration' then you are as much the problem as they are.

 

 

[Bluespunk]

2 minutes ago, nauseus said:

BLM.

Still not an attack on London by the BLM.

[Rookiescot]

1 minute ago, CorpusChristie said:

Somebody probably did make that up . 

Even Johnson says they are racist thugs.

 

Racist thuggery has no place on our streets. Anyone attacking the police will be met with full force of the law. These marches & protests have been subverted by violence and breach current guidelines. Racism has no part in the UK and we must work together to make that a reality.

[RuamRudy]

Just now, CorpusChristie said:

Somebody probably did make that up . 

If you were genuinely motivated to know, you could seek it out. There is ample video evidence available to prove it - all those minutes you have spent trying to suggest that it is a fabrication could have been saved with only a few seconds of google. 

[evadgib]

Just now, RuamRudy said:

 Man defending men defending Churchill's statue from literally nobody while giving nazi salutes and attacking police officers - you couldn't make it up. 

 

Why was it encased in steel? Why were veterans declared "racist" (by plod) for singing the National Anthem there on the Queens Birthday & why were they given (ordered!) to "leave in 5 mins"?

The Answer is that Parliament's Army in the form of plod, has taken sides and opted to defend BLM/Antifa while daubing everyone else 'far right' via a complicit MSM.

[FarangULong]

3 hours ago, TopDeadSenter said:

In laymans terms, a man that does not want to surrender British culture and history to a revisionist leftist mob. Nice of the police to finally spring into action, although I did not see scenes of mass looting like when the BLM were "protesting". Wonder why the patriotic pro-statue crowd deserved a beat down?

Reminds me of that time, when the EDL was new still and held a rally in Birmingham. Some random White kid, who was a local and unrelated to the march, was set upon by a mob of masked Pakistani "youths", due to the hate fueling media being at it again (headlines like/similar to: "We must defend Birmingham against the Fascists!", and similar nonsense).

 

The picture (where the kid is on the ground, being kicked by 5+ guys) circulated in the media, with captions like "Fascist beaten by anti Fascist protesters"....

 

Same story here, except this time they at least used "suspected", rather than just putting a rubber stamp on the categorisation...

 

Typical though, for this lefty-media and it's fake news (I say fake news, because the media no longer works with facts alone, but rather only with facts that suit their narrative, leaving out other facts, using half truths, etc.) tactics, to steer peoples' opinions into a certain direction ("anti-racism", globalization = good, mass migration = best thing since sliced bread, probably even better, etc.)....

[vogie]

25 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

If I were to attain your balanced and entirely non-partisan approach to life, would I see nirvana from there?

So you agree, you are biased and only see one side of an argument then?

Edited June 14, 2020 by vogie

[CorpusChristie]

5 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

If you were genuinely motivated to know, you could seek it out. There is ample video evidence available to prove it - all those minutes you have spent trying to suggest that it is a fabrication could have been saved with only a few seconds of google. 

I did a search but couldnt find it, could you post the photo or video up ?

[katana]

Citizens forced to protect statues from vandals due to soft policing = "hooligans"; "far right thugs".

Actual hooligans intent on criminal damage = "anti-racism protesters".

[vogie]

10 minutes ago, Rookiescot said:

Even Johnson says they are racist thugs.

I remember you saying Johnson was a liar, is he as pure as the driven snow now.????????????

[Rookiescot]

1 minute ago, vogie said:

I remember you saying Johnson was a liar, is he as pure as the driven snow now.????????????

Are you saying Johnson is wrong?

 

[herfiehandbag]

33 minutes ago, evadgib said:

One of the chants aimed at plod yesterday was "Where the F*** were you last week?"

That is actually rather funny, could it be described as black humour?