Jump to content

Ghislaine Maxwell loses late bid to block deposition's release, quickly appeals


webfact

Recommended Posts

Ghislaine Maxwell loses late bid to block deposition's release, quickly appeals

By Jonathan Stempel

 

2020-07-29T200217Z_1_LYNXNPEG6S1RG_RTROPTP_4_PEOPLE-GHISLAINE-MAXWELL.JPG

FILE PHOTO: Ghislaine Maxwell appears via video link during her arraignment hearing where she was denied bail for her role aiding Jeffrey Epstein to recruit and eventually abuse of minor girls, in Manhattan Federal Court, in the Manhattan borough of New York City, New York, U.S. July 14, 2020 in this courtroom sketch. REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg

 

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A U.S. judge on Wednesday denied Ghislaine Maxwell's last-ditch effort to keep a potentially damaging deposition from becoming public, as the jailed British socialite defends against criminal charges she aided the late financier Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of girls.

 

U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska in Manhattan rejected Maxwell's argument that her arrest on July 2 and indictment were "compelling" reasons to continue sealing her April 2016 deposition, and a deposition by an unnamed Epstein accuser.

 

The depositions came from a now-closed civil defamation lawsuit against Maxwell by one of Epstein's accusers, Virginia Giuffre.

 

Maxwell filed a notice of appeal less than an hour after Preska ruled.

 

She faces a Thursday deadline to appeal from Preska's July 23 order unsealing dozens of other documents, including flight logs from Epstein's private jets and police reports from Palm Beach, Florida, where Epstein had a home.

 

Maxwell, 58, pleaded not guilty on July 14 to helping Epstein recruit and eventually abuse three girls in the 1990s, and committing perjury by denying her involvement under oath.

 

In opposing the unsealing, her lawyers had accused Giuffre and federal prosecutors of violating a protective order in the civil case designed to keep Maxwell's deposition confidential.

 

The lawyers have said the deposition included "intrusive" questions about Maxwell's sex life and could prove embarrassing.

 

They accused Giuffre of leaking the deposition, and "in conjunction with the government" setting a "perjury trap" for their client.

 

But Preska said a criminal probe into Epstein's associates already "loomed large" when Maxwell opposed unsealing the deposition in June, and her arrest did not overcome the presumption the public deserved access.

 

"This is plowed ground," Preska wrote.

 

Giuffre has said Epstein kept her as a "sex slave" with Maxwell's assistance.

 

Maxwell's criminal trial is scheduled for July 2021. She is being held in a Brooklyn jail after the judge overseeing that case called her a flight risk.

 

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; editing by Jonathan Oatis and Grant McCool)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2020-07-30
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, webfact said:

a deposition by an unnamed Epstein accuser

 

Interesting that this one depostion is causing such consternation?

 

Surely there are dozens of other depositions.

 

But this one must be juicy.

 

 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bender Rodriguez said:

let me guess, names same as in panama papers.. rich & elite, known criminals, above the law... we know how it goes, they even get away with murder

Her father 'removed' many hundreds of millions from the Mirror Group pension fund before mysteriously 'falling off his yacht (the Lady Ghislane)' and croaking.

 

https://moneyweek.com/505757/great-frauds-in-history-robert-maxwell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Conspiracy theories aside, you come up with a conspiracy theory.

I think you need to understand what a conspiracy theory versus speculation is.

 

I wasn't buying into the idea that dark forces would somehow stage her mysterious suicide, rather just speculating on what she may or may not know about Epstein's activities

Edited by GinBoy2
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, GinBoy2 said:

I think you need to understand what a conspiracy theory versus speculation is.

 

I wasn't buying into the idea that dark forces would somehow stage her mysterious suicide, rather just speculating on what she may or may not know about Epstein's activities

Yes, agree with you there, your post was more speculation than conspiracy.

Edited by stevenl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, no, no, please let’s keep this as public and as embarrassing for her as possible!!! 
 

The absolute kicker would be, if she just started to rat everyone, which she’ll most likely do to save her skinny behind, and she would have some really ugly dirt on Trump! ????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Easily solved in the time of an epidemic, yet another corpse on the pile of covid casualties.

There was a certain campaign manager for Bush 41 who was a relatively young and healthy fellow, died of a mysterious ailment not long after the 1989 inauguration.  Speculate as you will.  But the truth is dead men, and women, tell no tales.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...