Jump to content

32 Pheu Thai MPs vow to stand by student protesters


Recommended Posts

Posted
28 minutes ago, pegman said:

So you have a problem with what democracy produces?

Sometimes. I'm not too happy with what's happened in America, where now everyone with a television has the vote, and can just make decisions based on sound bites that are lies, as they don't have the IQ or wherewithal to read up on all the facts. The original America allowed only for educated people to have the vote (white, male landowners). Universal suffrage, alas, allowed the overweight, tattooed bikers of recent South Dakota fame to elect (reelect) a president who, if bikers good read, research, analyze, and make a reasoned decision, wouldn't have a chance.

Anyway, as for Thailand and their universal suffrage, as such -- I'm not too comfortable with the masses making a reasoned decision on any future election.

Unfortunately, the current economic mess in Thailand, due to corvid, will scream for a change of gov't, particularly since the pedigree of the current one isn't too spick and span. Not that another gov't could, or would, do any better...

No, I kind of wish Thailand could semi-democratically find and embed their own Lee Kuan Yew. All this <deleted> about Western style democracy is, well, just <deleted> over here in Asia. And I wish Thailand, like Singapore, would preclude seditionist street rallies -- as they, unfortunately, can end up in bloody confrontations of idealists vs pragmatists.

None of this is going to help the tough road ahead for Thailand in recovering from corvid. And, actually, the current gov't, by world assessment, is not doing too badly.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, Scot123 said:

Yes innocents were murdered by the military at a temple then the brave nurse who aided them and witnessed was persecuted then just disappeared/silenced.  What about the coup makers preventing people from voting as they new who the people wanted wasnt them.

Yes, lots of innocent soldiers died because Thaksin wanted "his" money back. The red-shirts could all have gone home. The free busses were ready to bring them back to their homes.

 

And please look up the definition of murder. You obviously don't understand the meaning.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Which part about being a criminal don't you understand.

A criminal who is at the time when he commits his crimes a politician is still a criminal.

The list of Thaksin's crimes is long and it's not too difficult to see that he used his political position to commit many crimes.

Or do you really believe he is innocent? 555

Thaksin doesn't seem to have the human rights abuses to his name like the people he is opposite to. Of course, we can't talk about the truth under the regime you think is so much better than others. I guess if Thaksin had murdered those opposed to him like the fascists you love, you probably would like him.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

While Thaksin was in things weren't too bad in terms of freedom of expression, but once kicked out everything went fascist.

 

"Between 1990 and 2005, there were an average of five new cases per year. Since then, however, there have been at least 400 cases - an estimated 1,500 percent increase." -Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lèse_majesté_in_Thailand

 

I don't even know if that's been updated to the current year.

 

Bodies of Thai citizens found in the Mekong river with their stomachs cut open and filled with concrete and this regime and the other powerful institutions in Thailand don't react one bit to it. They don't do an investigation. They don't care. This is why the people are angry. It's not this event, it's the endless history of this abuse and the apathy by the same military-royalist regimes that has thrown people over the edge. In decades past, the news of these types of murders wouldn't even get in the news.

Edited by TooBigToFit
uodate
  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Posted
59 minutes ago, Yinn said:

They win 4 election.

up to the people right?

They win the election last time same. 

 

But 

 parliamentarians should consider the fact that Prayut lacks a mandate from the people since he did not run for election. Also, he is the sole PM candidate nominated by Phalang Pracharat, which failed to win a majority of seats in the March election and thereby has little in the way of legitimacy to form a government. 

Link 

https://www.nationthailand.com/opinion/30370562

 

 

What a difference a second paragraph made. Nice English syntax. 

Posted

An uprising, rebellion, bringing true democracy to the people will be measured by the number of dead bodies in the streets.  It always ends up that way.  If the Red shirts get involved maybe some of the dead will be those opposing an uprising,  rebellion,  bringing true democracy to the country. 

  • Confused 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...