Jump to content

EU's Barnier says 'very serious' gaps still in Brexit trade talks


Recommended Posts

Posted
39 minutes ago, dunroaming said:

 

It is hard to see how the words "politician" and "truth" can be used in the same sentence, along with "morals" and ethics".  When it comes to our politicians in government I fear we really are at the very bottom of the barrel.

Well start your own thread about that stuff.....????

  • Sad 1
Posted

There are Polls going back to September 2010 that indicated that 47% would leave the EU if there was a referendum on Britain's membership of the European Union, long before voteleave was formed in October 2015

http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/nqf0ycudkh/YG-Archives-Pol-Trackers-Europe-220113.pdf

 

These polls that a large % of people had decided their position 6 years before the  referendum in 2016

I know many Scots that knew which way they would vote if a referendum was to take place on Scottish independence 30 years ago

  • Like 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Nope. Of course Johnson would accept some quotas and tariffs on certain goods. That's normal for an FTA.

Free trade agreements may place restrictions on certain goods, such as drugs, arms, food that does not meet hygiene standards etc., and there are usually regulations to which both sides agree. But free trade is trade free of most quotas and tariffs.

 

What Is a Free Trade Agreement (FTA)?

 

But a FTA is not what Johnson and his Vote.Leave colleagues promised us in 2016. They promised us continued, complete and unfettered access to the single market. That goes a lot further than a FTA and is something no non EU member enjoys without accepting all the rules of same whilst having no say in those rules or access to the ECJ to settle disputes. 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
24 minutes ago, 7by7 said:

 What demands for 'continued control' are they, then?

 

 

 Without a trade deal?

 

What about the 1985 EU-China Trade and Cooperation Agreement?

Continued control would be via a level playing field which they control, and using the ECJ as the dispute mechanism.

 

The Trade and Cooperation agreement is not a full FTA.

 

https://fullfact.org/europe/who-trades-eu-under-wto-rules/

 

image.png

image.png

Posted
5 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Continued control would be via a level playing field which they control, and using the ECJ as the dispute mechanism.

 Which every other non member who has the access to the single market Johnson and Vote.Leave promised us has accepted.

 

There has to be some form of mechanism for resolving disputes; what would you suggest?

 

5 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

The Trade and Cooperation agreement is not a full FTA.

 I didn't say it was; but you said

 

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

it really makes you wonder how China and the EU do a Billion Euros of trade a day without a trade deal

(7by7 emphasis)

Which is clearly incorrect.

 

5 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Did you read that? I can only assume not as it proves you wrong!

  • Like 2
Posted
28 minutes ago, dunroaming said:

I was responding to a post from LuckyLuke.  No need to get your knickers in a twist ????

I am I not allowed to read and reply...?

  • Confused 1
Posted
3 hours ago, JonnyF said:

 

Yes, because it's going to be absolutely impossible to buy tomatoes from Spain without an FTA isn't it ????

 

With all these countries around the world refusing to trade with each other unless an FTA is in place, it really makes you wonder how China and the EU do a Billion Euros of trade a day without a trade deal, doesn't it. There must be massive queues at all those Chinese ports, all that paperwork, checking every single box in every single container, it must be chaos ????.

When you have 1.3 BILLION Chinese, who wants a job...

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted

          Really don't  see what all the fuss is about. Brexit talks should be scrapped, and then return to Pre 1973 conditions. And lets be free of all the EU <deleted>.

  • Like 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, grumpy 4680 said:

          Really don't  see what all the fuss is about. Brexit talks should be scrapped, and then return to Pre 1973 conditions. And lets be free of all the EU <deleted>.

 

That's a great idea, no more bulls**** about have your cake and eat it...! Why don't we put that to vote and see the result, and also say have 5 years to prepare for a complex separation like that...???? - where were you in 2016 to make this suggestion...????

 

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, dunroaming said:

Half of the people in the UK voted to remain.  Please don't tar us all with the same brush.

Now you see exactly what those across the channel think of ALL UK folk..........????

Posted
7 minutes ago, dunroaming said:

Half of the people in the UK voted to remain.  Please don't tar us all with the same brush.

What a terrible thing to say, if I was to "tar" you it would be for being an anti democrat. More than half voted to leave and that is why we are leaving.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, 3NUMBAS said:

MICHEL Barnier has admitted he must "compromise" on the bloc's hardline fishing demands in order to broker a Brexit agreement with Britain, it has emerged

Proof the gutter press can be right there will be a compromise. That's what negotiating is about. 

 

Now if you are able to source us actual news from reliable sources, that would be a great help. 

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Victornoir said:

Of course, but as with your system the minority has no rights, it is difficult to take it into consideration. Also note that I wrote England and not UK.

You may have written England but it was the UK who voted in the referendum not just England.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...