Jump to content

Exclusive: Top official on U.S. election cybersecurity tells associates he expects to be fired


Recommended Posts

Posted

Exclusive: Top official on U.S. election cybersecurity tells associates he expects to be fired

By Christopher Bing, Joseph Menn and Raphael Satter

 

2020-11-13T015532Z_1_LYNXMPEGAC03F_RTROPTP_4_USA-ELECTION-CYBER.JPG

U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Director Christopher Krebs speaks to reporters at CISA’s Election Day Operation Center on Super Tuesday in Arlington, Virginia, U.S., March 3, 2020. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

 

WASHINGTON/SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Top U.S. cybersecurity official Christopher Krebs, who worked on protecting the election from hackers but drew the ire of the Trump White House over efforts to debunk disinformation, has told associates he expects to be fired, three sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.

 

Krebs, who heads the Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), did not return messages seeking comment. CISA and the White House declined comment.

 

Separately, Bryan Ware, assistant director for cybersecurity at CISA, confirmed to Reuters that he had handed in his resignation on Thursday. Ware did not provide details, but a U.S. official familiar with his matter said the White House asked for Ware's resignation earlier this week.

 

The departure is part of the churn in the administration since Republican President Donald Trump was defeated by Democrat Joe Biden in last week's election, raising concerns about the transition to the president-elect who would take office on Jan. 20. Trump, who has yet to concede and has repeatedly made unsubstantiated claims of electoral fraud, fired Defense Secretary Mark Esper and has installed loyalists in top positions at the Pentagon.

 

Krebs has drawn praise from both Democrats and Republicans for his handling of the election, which generally ran smoothly despite persistent fears that foreign hackers might try to undermine the vote.

 

But he drew the ire of the Trump White House over a website run by CISA dubbed "Rumor Control" which debunks misinformation about the election, according to the three people familiar with the matter.

 

Top U.S. cybersecurity official Christopher Krebs, who worked on protecting the election from hackers but drew the ire of the Trump White House over efforts to debunk disinformation, has told associates he expects to be fired, three sources familiar with the matter told Reuters. This report produced by Chris Dignam.

 

White House officials have asked for content to be edited or removed which pushed back against numerous false claims about the election, including that Democrats are behind a mass election fraud scheme. CISA officials have chosen not to delete accurate information.

 

In particular, one person said, the White House was angry about a CISA post rejecting a conspiracy theory that falsely claims an intelligence agency supercomputer and program, purportedly named Hammer and Scorecard, could have flipped votes nationally. No such system exists, according to Krebs, election security experts and former U.S. officials.

 

On Twitter, U.S. Senator Mark Warner, a Democrat, wrote: "Chris Krebs has done a great job protecting our elections. He is one of the few people in this Administration respected by everyone on both sides of the aisle. There is no possible justification to remove him from office. None."

 

Krebs has steadily shot down rumors of fraud in recent days, including retweeting leading election security expert Matt Blaze, who for years has warned of specific vulnerabilities in election gear, when the professor wrote that "no serious evidence has yet been found or presented that suggests that the 2020 election outcome in any state has been altered through technical exploitation."

 

Gregory Crabb, chief information security officer for the U.S. Postal Service, which was also under pressure over misinformation about mail-in ballots, said: "From my view on the election frontlines, Krebs was a great partner and deserves accolades for his work."

 

(Reporting by Christopher Bing; Additional reporting by Raphael Satter in Washington; Editing by Nick Macfie and Grant McCool)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2020-11-13
 
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, webfact said:

Separately, Bryan Ware, assistant director for cybersecurity at CISA, confirmed to Reuters that he had handed in his resignation on Thursday. Ware did not provide details, but a U.S. official familiar with his matter said the White House asked for Ware's resignation earlier this week.

 

Should have refused and told them to fire him.

  • Like 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Yes. He is now in full dictator mode.

Stalin had spotters....he wanted the name of the first person to stop clapping after he made a speech.....

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, placeholder said:

Abd this has what to do with the firing of this person?

 

Replying to :  "Trump needs to be booted out of there ASAP"

  • Haha 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Tug said:

the mother of all temper tantrums

got yerself a little bit of a Freudian slip there!

"father" would have served just as well in his case.

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Phoenix Rising said:

One of several. What I want to see is a thorough investigation into what kompromat putin has on trump, a treason trial and suitable punishment meted out.

Best to see what kompromat is held on republican congressmen as well.  Many seem to completely ignore previous personal positions to follow 45 no matter what.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Somtamnication said:

What a bloodbath. I hope that criminal investigations follow after Jan 20th. This is ridiculous.

Reminds me of the Soviet purge before the Nazi invasion.

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, darksidedog said:

This isn't about what an individual wishes for. It is about the electorates votes that matter.

For better or for worse, the Democrat numbers are significantly higher than the Republican ones.

It is traditional under such circumstances to concede and allow the winner to have their crack at running the ship.

I do not dispute any persons right to use legal options to explore options.

Well over a week into this now though, and there have been no revelations of voter fraud, in remotely close to the levels that would be required to overturn the lead.

What the evidence coming forward has shown, is of courts throwing out very ill thought out and oft times laughable cases, yet none of the alleged fraud appearing. The latter in itself is truly remarkable, as if it had happened, you would expect something to have shown up by now.

I don't expect the losing side to be happy. Every four years there is such a situation, yet never before has it deteriorated to the extent we see today.

Every time a Trump accusation turns out to be incorrect or untrue, the more you have to question how any of the accusations from him, of which he has no evidence, should be worthy of consideration.

Firing people down the line in positions of trust because you don't like that they are standing by the truth and refusing to participate in false narrative is just nasty.

 

 

Gore vs Bush - 4 weeks. None of my posts have denied Biden's win and with the huge establishment behind him it was no surprise. I don't like the concept of continuing voting after Election Day but that's the way it is at the moment. If it was simple popular vote all this would be avoided and president Gore would have won (as would Biden).

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...