Former U.S. Presidents Obama, Bush, Clinton willing to take coronavirus vaccine on camera

[Jeffr2]

20 minutes ago, Kelsall said:

Operation Warp Speed! 

 

Thank you President Trump!

Do you also want to thank him for the excess deaths due to his lies and mishandling of the pandemic?  Guess ya don't.

[Jeffr2]

7 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

No I wouldn't trust Trump.

 

I would look at the test data and then decide for myself. I trust my own judgement.

Are you a medical expert? If not, doubt you'll fully understand the data.  I've tried reading some technical reports.  Beyond me, and I've got a background in data analysis.

[JonnyF]

11 minutes ago, Jeffr2 said:

Are you a medical expert? If not, doubt you'll fully understand the data.  I've tried reading some technical reports.  Beyond me, and I've got a background in data analysis.

 

I'm blessed with being phenomenally perspicacious.

 

[Jingthing]

9 hours ago, teacherclaire said:

I'm impressed. Trump doesn't need one, but wait. Perhaps he didn't have COVID ?

 

   The problem with liars is that they never tell the truth. Let's go and play golf. 

Wrong.

People that have had Covid are going to be encouraged to get vaccinated as well.

[Jingthing]

Considering the current occupant of the white house until January 20 is showing no leadership on the pandemic this cooperation by ex presidents is both good and necessary. 

Edited December 4, 2020 by Jingthing

[Kelsall]

1 hour ago, Jeffr2 said:

Do you also want to thank him for the excess deaths due to his lies and mishandling of the pandemic?  Guess ya don't.

Trump saved thousands of lives by his actions such as cutting off travel from China and Operation Warp Speed to name just two.  You should just say "thank you."

[Lacessit]

7 minutes ago, Kelsall said:

Trump saved thousands of lives by his actions such as cutting off travel from China and Operation Warp Speed to name just two.  You should just say "thank you."

Discouraging his supporters from wearing masks, mocking Biden for doing so. Admitting to Woodward he deliberately downplayed the severity. Holding superspreader rallies.

Don't you get tired of posting absolute BS which is so easily rebuttable?

[Lacessit]

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

 

I'm blessed with being phenomenally perspicacious.

 

Your perspicacity does not extend to asking what these leaders have to gain by getting vaccinated publicly. They can't run for office again, so perhaps they are just setting an example for others to follow. Which IMO is a much better one than the current occupant of the White House has set for the last 4 years, sowing division and hatred.

[placeholder]

9 minutes ago, Kelsall said:

Trump saved thousands of lives by his actions such as cutting off travel from China and Operation Warp Speed to name just two.  You should just say "thank you."

First off, Trump didn't actually cut off travel from China. He allowed thousands of people to return without adequately quarantining them. But even if he had cut off travel from China the way you believed he did, he waited another 40 days to cut off travel from Europe. And an additional 4 days to cut off travel from the UK and Ireland. The strain of coronavirus that infected the East Coast was predominantly from Europe. So it's clear that his reasons for canceling flights was politically based, not epidemiologically.

As for rapid development of the vaccine...was it really so rapid? Trump announced the initiative on May 15. Apparently it began  to take shape on Apr 29.  What took him so long? And wasn't it the obvious thing to do? Or were vaccines a completely untested idea that the Trump administration invented? You might want to look up Edward Jenner in Wikipedia before you answer that.

[Rimmer]

Troll post and a flame removed also replies

[placeholder]

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

I think you must be confusing me with someone else.

 

I need a plausible reason for what? For who not to take it? Your whole post is gibberish ????.

"I am not a COVID denier and I am not anti vaccine. I simply do not trust any of these 3 individuals. I'm afraid you're going to have to criticize something else that I have never said"

Why wouldn't they take it? You think there's some dark secret about the vaccine that they know about? You think thousands of people haven't agreed to be tested and millions more are willing to take the vaccine? The only way to make sense of your comments is to once again refer to Pavlov, Ian.

[canuckamuck]

Them getting a shot would prove nothing to anyone with any critical thinking skills. There would be no way whatsoever to prove what was in the needle. Regardless of what circus they preform trying to establish that it is all legitimate. Just more pro-wrestling level sincerity for the masses.

[Jingthing]

3 minutes ago, canuckamuck said:

Them getting a shot would prove nothing to anyone with any critical thinking skills. There would be no way whatsoever to prove what was in the needle. Regardless of what circus they preform trying to establish that it is all legitimate. Just more pro-wrestling level sincerity for the masses.

I find your post bizarre, irrational, and absurd. Of course they will be getting real vaccines for two reasons. For the LEADERSHIP example to their people to fight the evil of anti-vaccer movement, and also because they are older men that would naturally WANT the vaccine in the first place. You're just sniping with no basis in fact or evidence, and it's truly disgusting. 

[Jingthing]

1 hour ago, placeholder said:

"I am not a COVID denier and I am not anti vaccine. I simply do not trust any of these 3 individuals. I'm afraid you're going to have to criticize something else that I have never said"

Why wouldn't they take it? You think there's some dark secret about the vaccine that they know about? You think thousands of people haven't agreed to be tested and millions more are willing to take the vaccine? The only way to make sense of your comments is to once again refer to Pavlov, Ian.

It's simply irrational hostility to any president that isn't the current one who for some reason has attracted a cult like following. 

[Sujo]

6 minutes ago, canuckamuck said:

Them getting a shot would prove nothing to anyone with any critical thinking skills. There would be no way whatsoever to prove what was in the needle. Regardless of what circus they preform trying to establish that it is all legitimate. Just more pro-wrestling level sincerity for the masses.

Im sure if trump took it you would be agreeing to it.

 

if trump wants the kudos and how he arranged it from warp speed then you dont agree with him.

[Jingthing]

Just now, Sujo said:

Im sure if trump took it you would be agreeing to it.

 

if trump wants the kudos and how he arranged it from warp speed then you dont agree with him.

Mr. Trump should take it. 

Having had the disease does not provide long term immunity.

He also should join the other presidents (and I assume the president elect will be taking it too) in making a big public show of it.

But will he? I've learned not to expect good things from Mr. Trump, but once in a blue moon, he does shock. 

[Sujo]

1 hour ago, Kelsall said:

Trump saved thousands of lives by his actions such as cutting off travel from China and Operation Warp Speed to name just two.  You should just say "thank you."

You trump supporters need to get your story straight.

 

is it thanks to trump for the vaccine or dont take it?

[canuckamuck]

1 hour ago, Sujo said:

Im sure if trump took it you would be agreeing to it.

 

if trump wants the kudos and how he arranged it from warp speed then you dont agree with him.

Not at all, I don't trust him either

 

[canuckamuck]

2 hours ago, Jingthing said:

I find your post bizarre, irrational, and absurd. Of course they will be getting real vaccines for two reasons. For the LEADERSHIP example to their people to fight the evil of anti-vaccer movement, and also because they are older men that would naturally WANT the vaccine in the first place. You're just sniping with no basis in fact or evidence, and it's truly disgusting. 

What basis in fact do I require to assume that top level politicians are dangerous and dishonest. It has been proven a logical assumption for thousands of years

[Jingthing]

3 minutes ago, canuckamuck said:

What basis in fact do I require to assume that top level politicians are dangerous and dishonest. It has been proven a logical assumption for thousands of years

No, not playing this game with you.

You directly accused three ex-U.S. presidents of conspiring to take fake vaccines for show.

That clearly isn't true.

Again -- your accusation is really sick. 

[connda]

Which would prove nothing at all, well except perhaps the gullibility of the general public.  But that's a given. 

"Three saline solutions IV push stat!.  Now point the "Covid-19" label toward the camera aaand Cut. Make it a wrap."

[Jingthing]

1 hour ago, connda said:

Which would prove nothing at all, well except perhaps the gullibility of the general public.  But that's a given. 

"Three saline solutions IV push stat!.  Now point the "Covid-19" label toward the camera aaand Cut. Make it a wrap."

More fiction writing. 

[canuckamuck]

10 hours ago, Jingthing said:

No, not playing this game with you.

You directly accused three ex-U.S. presidents of conspiring to take fake vaccines for show.

That clearly isn't true.

Again -- your accusation is really sick. 

That's not true, I said people with the ability to think critically wouldn't believe it, because there can be no proof they actually did it.

That is not saying they are conspiring, it is saying those who oppose the vaccine will assume they are. 

 

 

Edited December 5, 2020 by canuckamuck

[Jeffr2]

13 hours ago, Kelsall said:

Trump saved thousands of lives by his actions such as cutting off travel from China and Operation Warp Speed to name just two.  You should just say "thank you."

 

You really need a better source for your news.  Trump did not save thousands of lives by cutting off travel from China.  The US got nailed by travelers coming in from Europe, not China.  And perhaps we wouldn't need Operations Warp Speed if he hadn't lied about the severity of the virus, or kept expert medical personnel out of the loop.  So no, he does not deserve a thank you.  More like a prison sentence for killing thousands of Americans.

 

5 minutes ago, canuckamuck said:

That's not true, I said people with the ability the to think critically wouldn't believe it, because there can be no proof they actually did it.

That is not saying they are conspiring, it is saying those who oppose the vaccine will assume they are. 

 

 

Critical thinkers wouldn't think like you.  Just more conspiracy theories.  Which we really don't need right now.

[Jeffr2]

An interesting tool to see where you are in the line for the jab, if you are from the US.  I'm close to last. LOL

 

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/12/03/opinion/covid-19-vaccine-timeline.html

Find Your Place in the Vaccine Line

[Kelsall]

Jimmy Carter is an old former president.  Why isn't he doing this?

[Jeffr2]

3 minutes ago, Kelsall said:

Jimmy Carter is an old former president.  Why isn't he doing this?

He's 96.  Give him a break.

[placeholder]

34 minutes ago, canuckamuck said:

That's not true, I said people with the ability to think critically wouldn't believe it, because there can be no proof they actually did it.

That is not saying they are conspiring, it is saying those who oppose the vaccine will assume they are. 

 

 

What nonsense. Why would someone who is against vaccination necessarily believe that those who are for it wouldn't take the injection? Is it rational thinking to believe that those who oppose you on an issue are lying? Do rational people really think that way Or is that conspiratorial thinking?

Even accepting your nonsense that these 3 ex-presidents are dishonest and dangerous, are you suggesting that they are compulsively dishonest? Why would they lie about taking the vaccine? What would be their motivation? These are 3  people in an age group with a heightened risk from contracting the illness.  Unless you believe that they are also in on a conspiracy and know the vaccine to be dangerous, why would they lie?

[Scott]

Bickering, baiting posts and replies removed.

 

[Lacessit]

11 hours ago, canuckamuck said:

What basis in fact do I require to assume that top level politicians are dangerous and dishonest. It has been proven a logical assumption for thousands of years

You are making the assumption that top level politicians are dangerous and dishonest 24/7. Which is probably true of Trump, not so the others.

If I recall correctly, Bush, Obama and Clinton all released their tax returns, so your logic is looking somewhat tatty.

Edited December 5, 2020 by Lacessit