Jump to content

Britain's Sainsbury's to cut 500 more jobs, shrink office space


webfact

Recommended Posts

Britain's Sainsbury's to cut 500 more jobs, shrink office space

 

2021-03-03T193600Z_1_LYNXNPEH221FK_RTROPTP_4_SAINSBURY-S-REDUNDANCIES.JPG

FILE PHOTO: Women shop at a Sainsbury's supermarket, amid the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak, in London, Britain January 12, 2021. REUTERS/Henry Nicholls/File Photo

 

LONDON (Reuters) - British supermarket group Sainsbury's plans to cut an additional 500 jobs and reduce its office space as it simplifies administrative functions for the post-pandemic era, it said on Wednesday.

 

The job cuts are on top of 3,500 put at risk after new CEO Simon Roberts embarked on a major restructuring in November that closed Argos shops and in-store meat, fish and deli counters.

 

The latest move will see the group vacate two floors at its headquarters in Holborn, central London, two floors at its office in Milton Keynes, outside of the capital, and one floor at its office in Manchester, northern England. Other smaller offices will also close.

 

"The money we save will enable us to invest in what customers really care about - lower prices, exciting new products and the most convenient ways for them to shop," said Roberts, who succeeded Mike Coupe in June.

 

Sainsbury's, Britain's second largest supermarket group after Tesco, also said it plans to close its online fulfilment centre (OFC), or so called "dark store", in Bromley-by-Bow, east London, as it focuses on servicing online orders from regular stores.

 

It said it hoped to redeploy most of the 650 workers at the centre to other stores.

 

Sainsbury's' latest job cuts come a week after rival Asda said 5,000 jobs were at risk from a restructuring.

 

Shares in the group, up 12% over the last year, closed Wednesday at 221.3 pence, valuing the business at just under 5 billion pounds ($7 billion).

 

($1 = 0.7161 pounds)

 

(Reporting by James Davey; Editing by Alistair Smout, Kirsten Donovan)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2021-03-04
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

 

I would call it sad that it is considered necessary, but a compassionate recognition of the fact that a minority group feels that they need to be able to isolate themselves from the pressures that those of us not in that minority group do not routinely experience. 

 

You're welcome to your opinion of course.

 

I would call it virtue signaling from a supercilious corporation that is not only hugely patronizing to black people by assuming they need protection from the evil white man, but also pushes regressive policies that should have been left long in the past. A cynical ploy to attempt to gain some credibility by pandering to the recent, divisive trend of identity politics. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

You're welcome to your opinion of course.

 

I would call it virtue signaling from a supercilious corporation that is not only hugely patronizing to black people by assuming they need protection from the evil white man, but also pushes regressive policies that should have been left long in the past. A cynical ploy to attempt to gain some credibility by pandering to the recent, divisive trend of identity politics. 

 

That would assume, however, that black employees are incapable of thinking for themselves, and are merely following instruction to congregate in these locations. Now that would be patronising. 

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RuamRudy said:

 

Oops - sorry, just seen your link. 

 

Mr Doyle seems like an... interesting chap. He's a bit overly concerned with 'critical race theory' if his timeline is anything to go by, but then again he has a book to sell so maybe he is using the Yaxley Lennon / Katie Hopkins approach of saying outrageous things to people desperate to be outraged?

 

Yes Andrew Doyle is a very interesting chap. I'm not sure of his comparison with Tommy Robinson though, he's a left wing Labour supporter, author and playwright.

 

I'd imagine you'd be more aligned with one of his best friends though, Titania McGrath.

 

Back on topic though, I can't imagine Sainsbury's shareholders will be too impressed with their ill advised foray into politics and advising their customers to shop elsewhere if they have alternative political beliefs. Maybe it's time for some diversity of thought from their Board members?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Protecting staff and customers from racial abuse is not a ‘political belief’ its a legal duty of all employers/businesses owners.

 

Work places are by law required to be ‘safe spaces’.

 

.....

 

But here’s another observation:

 

How often do we have to put up with accusation of ‘playing the race card’, and yet here you are again inserting your problems with race into yet another topic where it has no place?!

 

 

 

Missed the point haven't you. Deliberately I suspect.

 

As you well know, I am 100% opposed to racial segregation. Sainsbury's have a policy of racially segregating. Racially segregating is not protecting anyone, it is a regressive and divisive policy more akin to 1950's America. I believe in treating everyone the same irrespective of colour.

 

Sounds like you'd like to go back to the days of blacks sitting at the back of the bus again? It would appear it is you that has issues with race, not me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Sainsbury have for a number of years now had a great wine selection.

I'm curranty on a cheeky Spanish Carta Roja from the bottom shelf at £4.97 it' a stunner would like to progress to looking up but stuck here on universal credit ????   

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Sainsbury do not have a policy of racial segregation, any amount of gaslighting won’t change that fact.

 

 

 

Yes they do. They have black only 'safe spaces'. I have provided links already. 

 

First you support them, and now you deny their existence. Who is gaslighting? 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Your link was a Twitter post from a comedian.

 

Perhaps you posted it for comic effect.

 

Sainsbury are not segregating anyone.

 

Yes they are, as you have seen from the links. 

 

What's more, you support it. ????

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...