Jump to content

SURVEY: Would you leave to get vaccinated?


Scott

SURVEY: Would you leave to get vaccinated?  

314 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

I am going back to America in a couple of weeks.  The trip is dual purpose.  I want to be at the celebration for my brother’s 70th birthday and I’ll get the vaccine of my choosing.  I’ll be coming back to Thailand in July.  I already have a nice room reserved for my quarantine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, patman30 said:

same i hear from the missus, most dont want it.
the MILs village, only 1 person put their name down
the MIL asked the people coming around for registrants if they will be taking it?.... "no, scared"

 

Same with my missus... Her boss at work keeps badgering her employees to get the jab... Out of 24 employees, only two have declined, including the missus... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, scorecard said:

Also hoping that by November quarantine has completely stopped or reduced back to the previous 7 days, or reduced to 3 days as was proposed but never implemented. 

 

Also hoping that having 2 shots of the vaccine Pfizer or AZ, plus a booster of same as original or the other vaccine will help to gain zero or much reduced quarantine on arrival in LOS. 

 

 

I'd like to see my aging parents in the US again, and sooner rather than later. But there are risks in traveling when not yet vaccinated, and getting back to Thailand in a timely fashion isn't guaranteed. A prolonged stay abroad isn't really an option since I own and run a Thai company.  Timing a trip in between annual visa extension/work permit renewal is also a bit tricky. 

 

Others may face other difficulties, as highlighted by a former US Ambassador to Thailand:

 

"For U.S. citizens, returning home to get vaccinated is difficult. Traveling to America, taking
two shots three or four weeks apart, then spending two to three weeks in quarantine upon
return to Asia could cause the whole process to take up to seven weeks and thousands of
dollars in flights and accommodation. That’s not a realistic option if you have a full-time
job, especially if you have children."

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-americans-who-cant-get-vaccines-11622156230

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, WaveHunter said:

Thailand is probably one of the safest countries to be in right now as an unvaccinated person if you consider the relatively low number of Covid cases here compared with most other countries of the world.  Travelling to the US would expose me to high risk of infection, mainly from lengthy layovers in airports.  I feel that it is safer to stay here while practicing sensible social distancing and wait for vaccination here in the Kingdom.

My feeling is that Thailand is still very conservative with their testing program but statistics are statistics and compared to other places you're right - Thailand definitely has low overall numbers.  Why put yourself in a aluminum tube and risk international travel and mixing with the masses of people at international airports? 
The Mrs and I are good right here in the middle of rural Thailand in a province with no Covid cases.  Why move around?

Covid_Thai8.png.5261ea04d8c8f92f189b5c0f27eb12c0.png


 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too complicated for overseas travel for me at the moment. Some Countries (or rather one autonomous region of Portugal) allows one out of three for entry; 1) Proof of recovering from Covid within the last 90 days 2) negative test no more than 72 hours before departure 3) Proof of receiving both vaccine shots at least 15 days prior. However, the airlines all have their own requirements too. Transiting the colour zones has already been mentioned and adds to the headache. Hoping that Sinovac will eventually become universally acceptable and waiting for the time when proof of vaccination within a specific time frame will be the only requirement for International travel.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Misty said:

Others may face other difficulties, as highlighted by a former US Ambassador to Thailand:

 

"For U.S. citizens, returning home to get vaccinated is difficult. Traveling to America, taking
two shots three or four weeks apart, then spending two to three weeks in quarantine upon
return to Asia could cause the whole process to take up to seven weeks and thousands of
dollars in flights and accommodation. That’s not a realistic option if you have a full-time
job, especially if you have children."

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-americans-who-cant-get-vaccines-11622156230

I love my country.
They tell US expats not to come home on the one hand, and on the other hand they tell US expats that the US isn't China so unlike China don't expect Uncle Sam to extend a helping hand in a time of need to its citizens aboard. 

For all the China bashing on this forum it's easy to see which one of the two countries care about their citizens abroad and which one does not. 
China - provides vaccinations to it's citizens abroad via their embassies.
United States - "US citizens abroad aren't our problem.  Tough it out and don't bother us."

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, connda said:

I love my country.
They tell US expats not to come home on the one hand, and on the other hand they tell US expats that the US isn't China so unlike China don't expect Uncle Sam to extend a helping hand in a time of need to its citizens aboard. 

For all the China bashing on this forum it's easy to see which one of the two countries care about their citizens abroad and which one does not. 
China - provides vaccinations to it's citizens abroad via their embassies.
United States - "US citizens abroad aren't our problem.  Tough it out and don't bother us."

 

I agree.  And then there's the announcement that the US will send 550,000 vaccines for Korean soldiers...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"And then there's the announcement that the US will send 550,000 vaccines for Korean soldiers..."

 

I think ROK Soldiers(who will fight and possibly die with US Forces) are a little more important than us living in LOS.  ROK Soldiers have a lot of close contact with US Forces in S. Korea.  I can see the practical benefit of vaccinating as many as possible.  Logistically easier to have ROK Soldiers(many are stationed at US Military Garrisons in the ROK) vaccinated than rounding up US Expats who are  located in many parts of LOS or other ASEAN nations.  If I was still on Active Duty and stationed in ROK then I would want my fellow ROK soldiers vaccinated as well.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"For all the China bashing on this forum it's easy to see which one of the two countries care about their citizens abroad and which one does not. 
China - provides vaccinations to it's citizens abroad via their embassies.
United States - "US citizens abroad aren't our problem.  Tough it out and don't bother us."

 

 

In terms of China vaccinating it's overseas citizens(I wonder if Chinese in the US went to a local pharmacy and got the Pfizer vaccine for free??) I think it is more likely a matter of controlling it's citizens or possibly living up to the essential principle of Socialism: The State Will Provide What You Need.  Allegedly we capitalists are suppose to be Independent and "Fend for Ourselves".  This is what I was told when I attended a low cost public university in Long Beach CA when Reagan was POTUS.  Who knows?  Maybe the Chinese really care about the health and safety of it's oversea citizens?  Something to ponder over a beer or two on a hot Thailand afternoon. 

 

Of course  Joe Biden just announced a 6 Trillion(yes Trillion with a T) dollar budget for FY 2022.  Maybe there is some unallocated money for vaccinating overseas Americans.  The bad news is FY 2022 does not begin  until October 1, 2021.  

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

Doesn't really worry me.

I have no fear of COVID or of death, I've had my time and am satisfied with it.

I wouldn't want a lingering and painful end, but there are plenty of hotels with balconies to choose from.

 

My Thai misses is a far worse COVID anti-vaxxer than me, she says no way they are going to inject her, and most of her Thai LINE pals feel the same way. I seriously doubt Thailand is going to force even 25% of it's population to be vaccinated.

 

ThaiVISA claims a large elderly membership, I'm surprised more members haven't had serious COVID or long-COVID, and posted about their treatment, let alone members like me claiming non-serious COVID. If so few of us have had it, or claimed to have had it, maybe it isn't that serious?

Even doctors dont know why somebody get serious covid. My friend have wife and 2 kids, kids and wife get covid friend not even sleep same bed whit wife. Wife had running nose thats it kids loose how to taste like food for few days and thats it. My friend only was really bist off coz he have to be in quarantine total 28 days. Reason kids get that first and after first quarantine wife get it. In other hand one friend was in ICU over 30 days and he was really healty before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Covid has hardly affected our lives at all up here in sleepy Issan. I would run a far greater risk by leaving the country to get vaccinated than I would by simply staying here and doing nothing about it.

 

As it happens though I have an appointment in early August at the local hospital for my first jab, so all being well, it's not a problem either way.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"social contract"

 

I have lived and worked in 5 countries not named the USA.  The only services that a US Embassy/Consulate realistically offers is to replace or renew a passport, record the birth of child, notarize certain documents and visit you in jail. .  Anything more than that is "lip service".  A long time ago I worked for certain company based out Texas and  in a country located next to Pakistan.  When one of our fellow employee died(actually he was killed) the responsibility for getting his body home was the 100% responsibility of the employer.  The embassy(one of the most unwelcoming places I have ever been to) just wanted to know the name and home state of the deceased.  Another incident that exemplifies how much the US Government cares is this:  before  a severely injured coworker could be medically evacuated on a C-17 the Embassy demanded this employee had DBA and/or health insurance.  So we had to convoy back to the company office and printout the documents and then convoy back(not exactly a pleasant drive in armored vehicles?).  "Just paperwork that can wait"?  Not for the embassy.  Based upon my experience(s)with US Embassy/Consulate the US Government will never vaccinate overseas Americans.  The only exceptions I see are for military retirees and/or retired federal workers.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The only services that a US Embassy/Consulate realistically offers is to replace or renew a passport, record the birth of child, notarize certain documents and visit you in jail."

 

I've lived outside the US for decades, and without going into detail, I have to agree that the services (and attitude) of the ACS can underwhelm.

 

Even though there may not be snowball's chance in Bangkok, at this point I'm not ready to go quietly into that good night.  And I really appreciate our former Ambassador picking up the drum beat.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't be bothered with all the hassle of leaving Thailand just to get the vaccine

Will conform to wearing my face mask in public places

And wait until the hospitals more likely the Private international ones

and get the vaccine of my choice when available 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Misty said:

 

I agree.  And then there's the announcement that the US will send 550,000 vaccines for Korean soldiers...

I agree that China sets a leading example of looking out for and caring about their citizens who are outside of China. Unfortunately, the Australian govt is even less caring than USA govt regarding its citizens overseas. Scott Morrison (the Prime Minister) uses an "us Vs them" approach of treating Oz citizens abroad as expendable in his building of a fear campaign among the voters in Australia - justifying it as Fortress Australia and keeping Australians safe (so long as you are inside the Fortress!). His primary motivation is for his mob to win the election due within 14 months - who or what gets hurt or damaged along the way are easily and without conscience classed as expendable cannon fodder. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WaveHunter said:
  • Even though I would much prefer a Western vaccine such as Pfizer or J&J over SInoVac, SinoVac probably provides decent efficacy, and I could always supplement it with a Western vaccine at a later date.
  •  My big concern with SinoVac (right now) is that no Phase 3 study data on the vaccine has yet been published in peer-reviewed journals, and as such, many countries around the world are "on the fence" right now about whether or not travelers vaccinated with SInoVac will be granted entry.  I want to be able to travel freely ASAP, with no concerns about being barred entry.

A problem about travel in the future is how governments will manage apps, paper records, all that certify vaccination. Could be chaotic, so US, for example, appears to be leaving the problem up to the airlines.

 

Sinovac may never be cleared everywhere, so if you get a second or third shot from a private hospital, how to explain this mix between public and private, and will such a mix be considered sufficient for entry (if they can figure out which vaccinations when)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, placnx said:

A problem about travel in the future is how governments will manage apps, paper records, all that certify vaccination. Could be chaotic, so US, for example, appears to be leaving the problem up to the airlines.

 

Sinovac may never be cleared everywhere, so if you get a second or third shot from a private hospital, how to explain this mix between public and private, and will such a mix be considered sufficient for entry (if they can figure out which vaccinations when)?

Give it time and I'm sure there will be a unified way for an international solution similar to how passports work.

 

As for a mix of vaccines, I would guess that all that is important is that you have been vaccinated by an accepted brand; whether you were previously vaccinated with an unaccepted brand would have no bearing on that (IMHO).

Edited by WaveHunter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, statman78 said:

I am going back to America in a couple of weeks.  The trip is dual purpose.  I want to be at the celebration for my brother’s 70th birthday and I’ll get the vaccine of my choosing.  I’ll be coming back to Thailand in July.  I already have a nice room reserved for my quarantine.

Can you share with us what kind of insurance you will have to show for re-entry (I'm over 80 so it's a natural question whether some company would even sell it to me), and what kind of paperwork you'll have to have from a Thai embassy or consulate in the US? Thanks very much.

Edited by Enzian
Thanks
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, connda said:

Not necessarly true.  If so, link an article supporting your assertion.

Given how recent Covid is the studies of SARS-coV-2 immune response are self-limiting.  Studies completed in late 2020 and early 2021 relied on samples with subjects who were infected for no longer than 6 to 8 months.  What studies were finding is that there was virus-specific immune memory up to the limit of there sample, i.e., 6 to 8 months.  The studies didn't claim that no virus-specific immune memory existed after 8 months but conversely a robust virus-specific immune memory still was exhibited at 8 months.1
Now that Covid has been around for over a year, other studies are examining samples for virus-specific immune memory at one year2 , which show a robust immune response up to  1 year.  In a few more months we'll probably see samples tested beyond the 12 month mark.

Unless a study can be linked stating that the immune response to SARS-coV-2 falls significantly after 8 month, the the assertion is simply tosh.

1. Immunological memory to SARS-CoV-2 assessed for up to 8 months after infection, Jennifer Dan, et.al, AAAS Science, 05 Feb 2021: Vol. 371, Issue 6529
2. SARS-CoV-2 antibodies remain detectable 12 months after infection and antibody magnitude is associated with age and COVID-19 severity, Eric Laing, et.al, medRxiv, May 2, 2021

You make good points. This same also applies to the eventual need for vaccine boosters. Of course, each person's immune system is different, so trials and tests should cover a range of groups, but for sure those with weaker immune systems, i.e. old and those who are compromised by certain conditions. Then we can develop guidelines for recommending booster timing depending on age, etc.

 

From your second reference I quote:

"These findings support vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in all suitable populations including those individuals that have recovered from natural infection."

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.27.21256207v1

Edited by placnx
add quote
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, placnx said:

A problem about travel in the future is how governments will manage apps, paper records, all that certify vaccination. Could be chaotic, so US, for example, appears to be leaving the problem up to the airlines.

 

Sinovac may never be cleared everywhere, so if you get a second or third shot from a private hospital, how to explain this mix between public and private, and will such a mix be considered sufficient for entry (if they can figure out which vaccinations when)?

 

IATA has already been working on that: IATA Travel Pass Initiative

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, connda said:

Not necessarly true.  If so, link an article supporting your assertion.

Given how recent Covid is the studies of SARS-coV-2 immune response are self-limiting.  Studies completed in late 2020 and early 2021 relied on samples with subjects who were infected for no longer than 6 to 8 months.  What studies were finding is that there was virus-specific immune memory up to the limit of there sample, i.e., 6 to 8 months.  The studies didn't claim that no virus-specific immune memory existed after 8 months but conversely a robust virus-specific immune memory still was exhibited at 8 months.1
Now that Covid has been around for over a year, other studies are examining samples for virus-specific immune memory at one year2 , which show a robust immune response up to  1 year.  In a few more months we'll probably see samples tested beyond the 12 month mark.

Unless a study can be linked stating that the immune response to SARS-coV-2 falls significantly after 8 month, the the assertion is simply tosh.

1. Immunological memory to SARS-CoV-2 assessed for up to 8 months after infection, Jennifer Dan, et.al, AAAS Science, 05 Feb 2021: Vol. 371, Issue 6529
2. SARS-CoV-2 antibodies remain detectable 12 months after infection and antibody magnitude is associated with age and COVID-19 severity, Eric Laing, et.al, medRxiv, May 2, 2021

 

There is other interesting research:

 

https://news.sky.com/story/people-whove-had-covid-get-enhanced-protection-against-variants-from-one-vaccine-dose-study-12291757

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...