Jump to content

Thailand reports record high of coronavirus infections and deaths


webfact

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, sucit said:

Daily cases in the US for example are spiking. The vaccine has been being administered for months. 
 

I don’t have a solution I just find it odd more people aren’t speaking about this.

 

I believe the mechanism is probably people get comfortable after they get the vaccine, they can finally relax. And bam. 
 

I think every country is going to have to go through a post vaccination wave. Can cross fingers after that.
 

Thailand is just entering its initial wave. 

Yes, but the USA is like two different countries. Some states are heavily vaccinated. Some very lightly vaccinated. I believe the spike is mainly in the unvaccinated states. Might be wrong, but that makes logical sense to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DonniePeverley said:

Absolutely awful. This Indian variant has been horrific. 

 

Out of all this i still don't understand how the virus entered Thailand - is it safe to assume the borders were never secure at any point? The unstable situation in India and Myanmar was probably the route into Thailand. Surely those borders should have been manned with the military. 

Thailand isn't a island . Even guarding the borders very strict can lead to a contact here or there . There's also fisherman , aircraft personnel , and all kinds of goods transported over borders 100% legal . It sounds easy to close the borders but it isn't at all . When enough persons are infected in countries nearby , and you aren't a island , then it's nearly impossible to keep the virus outside .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Andrew65 said:

Thailand has a similar population to the UK. The highest daily infection rate in the UK was 81,505 (29 Dec 2020). So, at around 18,000, Thailand is still way behind that (if their numbers are true!?).

Testing in the UK far exceeded what Thailand is doing. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, GroveHillWanderer said:

Yes, but as the commonly used expression has it, this is a "pandemic of the unvaccinated."

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/30/cdc-study-shows-74percent-of-people-infected-in-massachusetts-covid-outbreak-were-fully-vaccinated.html

 

Vaccinated people are probably transmitting to unvaccinated. I am not sure what that means wrt your theory

Edited by sucit
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Andrew65 said:

Thailand has a similar population to the UK. The highest daily infection rate in the UK was 81,505 (29 Dec 2020). So, at around 18,000, Thailand is still way behind that (if their numbers are true!?).

Thailand testing is way behind . Specialists over here ( Belgium ) said a few months ago that they were thinking that they knew 1/10 infected in the start of pandemic (march-june 2020 ) and after with much better testing in late 2020 they thought they had 1/3 of infected persons . That is with lot of testing and in a big wave . That is also why WHO states the 5% rate of testing/positive is a max limit for a wave to be under control or not . Anything above 5% positives means , you miss way too much people who do have it .

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, sezze said:

Thailand testing is way behind . Specialists over here ( Belgium ) said a few months ago that they were thinking that they knew 1/10 infected in the start of pandemic (march-june 2020 ) and after with much better testing in late 2020 they thought they had 1/3 of infected persons . That is with lot of testing and in a big wave . That is also why WHO states the 5% rate of testing/positive is a max limit for a wave to be under control or not . Anything above 5% positives means , you miss way too much people who do have it .

It seems like there are 1001 variables when it comes to COVID19 and stats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

Your posts are inferring that vaccines aren't effective. They are effective at preventing serious illness and death, even with the Delta variant.

 

Maybe you are reading too much into my posts?

 

I said infections are rising. Considering half the us population is vaccinated, why would cases be rising. Why would they not be falling?
 

What you call  misinformation folks like me call a good question. 

Edited by sucit
  • Sad 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, dinsdale said:

Australia with 13.5% double jabbed is looking at April I think it is to have 70% fully jabbed. Australia is also getting in 10's of millions of jabs including enough for boosters. Thailand is still < 6% fully vacced. 

Expectations are 70% by end of year. Current outbreak is causing a surge in the previously hesitant or no rush crowd to go and get vaccinated but still a lot of hesitancy over AZ. 
case numbers still rising despite hard lockdown. 
1000 police manning ring of steel around the city to prevent repeat of last week’s protests Have 10 BMW highway patrol cars around the corner stopping all city bound vehicles. 
Army is now door knocking all positive cases daily to make sure they are home after several caught going to work etc knowing they were positive. 
They are throwing every available resource at it. But I’m not confident you can fully conquer delta once it’s out. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

He consciously and deliberately avoids mentioning / acknowledging that (effectiveness at preventing serious illness and deaths) every time...

 

Thus, not wasting my breath any more...  ????

 

Yeah, sealioning is the phrase that comes to mind. Had a point, mis explained himself, ignores information provided, just goes on about the original point in isolation. Now resorting to ill defined general comments. Abuse will be next.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, wensiensheng said:

1. It is misinformation to say that previous infection counts for nothing. It clearly does. However, it does not preclude reinfection.

 

2. I saw nothing in the now removed post alluding to natural immunity. It did have some extrapolation of theories based on the misconception that vaccines are primarily designed to stop infection. By not understanding the primary benefit conferred by vaccines, what came after was tainted fruit.

 

you do realize that in your first sentence you say that natural immunity is given zero credit for some reason. You then go on to say in a later sentence that infection counts for nothing. You seem to be tying yourself in knots for some unknown reason.

My point about in the UK that prior infection counts for nothing is related to the domestic vaccine passports that seem to be on the way in there.    Someone in their 20s, who is confirmed to have had covid and who had a mild or asymptomatic infection will not be allowed to go to a nightclub in September there unless vaccinated - so in that case prior infection counts for nothing.

 

Yes, naturally immunity does not preclude reinfection, but of the very small number of people that have managed to catch it twice, I don't think there are any that died or had a more severe illness than they did the first time.   On that basis alone I do not know why prior infection is not at least given equal weight to the vaccines.    In a country that quite frankly does not have enough vaccines then anyone who has 'recovered' from the virus should not be given it until at least everybody else has been vaccinated, and those recovered should be given the same status as someone vaccinated if 'unvaccinated' people are excluded from certain activities.   That was my point I was trying to make I think.    

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, sucit said:

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/30/cdc-study-shows-74percent-of-people-infected-in-massachusetts-covid-outbreak-were-fully-vaccinated.html

 

Vaccinated people are probably transmitting to unvaccinated. I am not sure what that means wrt your theory

The small number of vaccinated individuals who suffer breakthrough infections indeed can infect others.

 

Virtually all unvaccinated and infected individuals can infect others.

 

Do you understand the difference between “small number” and “virtually all”?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...