Ketanji Brown Jackson sworn in as first black woman on the U.S. Supreme Court

[Jingthing]

58 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Don't be a dick.   Of course not. There have been many "not white men" chosen for the court. Doesn't bother me one way or another. My point was that it shouldn't be a factor either way for the President too.  And IF it is a factor for him, that demonstrates a character flaw that needs to be addressed.

What percentage historically pray tell?

[Bluespunk]

4 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

My objections are mainly to Biden's hamhanded approach to the situation. Using the presence or absence of a uterus and extra melanin as being meaningful qualifications to such an important position is remarkably bigoted, even for an old school racist like Joe Biden. 

Yeah right, that’s why you object to this appointment. 
 

Sarcasm alert

[Hanaguma]

4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Earlier you made the accusation of selection on the basis of ‘affirmative action’.

 

Now you object to the predominance of candidates being selected who attended the two top law schools in the US.

 

Entry to these law schools is extremely competitive, not so many other law schools.

 

Perhaps you would like to see ‘affirmative action’ in favor of less academically gifted applicants.

Well, when Biden came out with a list of potential Justices who were ALL the same in sex and race, what is one to think?

 

As for other law schools being beneath Yalevard, that is quite debatable. The top tier schools are remarkably similar.

[ozimoron]

2 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

I am not sure the headline is accurate. Justice Brown cannot actually say what a "woman" is, so by simple logic you cannot say that she is one. Indeed, calling her one may be a micro-aggression.  You need to be careful these days not to make such assumptions. 

Declined to ask an obvious baiting question by an imbecile.

[Hanaguma]

4 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

What percentage historically pray tell?

Completely irrelevant.  Looking at the last few decades is much more pertinent. 

[Hanaguma]

6 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Yeah right, that’s why you object to this appointment. 
 

Sarcasm alert

Your evidence being.......

[Mac Mickmanus]

1 minute ago, ozimoron said:

Declined to ask an obvious baiting question by an imbecile.

*Answer* ?

[Chomper Higgot]

1 minute ago, Hanaguma said:

Well, when Biden came out with a list of potential Justices who were ALL the same in sex and race, what is one to think?

 

As for other law schools being beneath Yalevard, that is quite debatable. The top tier schools are remarkably similar.

I think he got it right, Justice Brown Jackson is a great pick.

[Jingthing]

1 minute ago, Hanaguma said:

Completely irrelevant.  Looking at the last few decades is much more pertinent. 

How convenient

[Hanaguma]

2 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Declined to ask an obvious baiting question by an imbecile.

Or perhaps declined out of fear of being pilloried by the Woke Left? The answer is of course simple. A woman is an adult human female.  What is so hard about that?

[Bluespunk]

Just now, Hanaguma said:

Your evidence being.......

Your opening series of posts on this thread.
 

Your new found objections based on alma mater do not ring true, given the nature of your earlier posts. 

[Chomper Higgot]

2 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Or perhaps declined out of fear of being pilloried by the Woke Left? The answer is of course simple. A woman is an adult human female.  What is so hard about that?

How is this even relevant in this discussion?

 

 

[Mac Mickmanus]

5 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I think he got it right, Justice Brown Jackson is a great pick.

She is hetro sexual though, they should have chosen someone a bit more diverse 

[Hanaguma]

...and in the rush to be the first to get their virtue signalle, Good Morning America managed to step on their own crank.

 

 

[Chomper Higgot]

2 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

She is hetro sexual though, they should have chosen someone a bit more diverse 

Not for the first time you insert your fixation with other people’s gender into your posts.

[Hanaguma]

7 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Your opening series of posts on this thread.
 

Your new found objections based on alma mater do not ring true, given the nature of your earlier posts. 

Well, out with it. Why do you think I objected?  Stop dancing around the turd. 

[Jingthing]

4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

How is this even relevant in this discussion?

 

 

Because Fox news brain infection never sleeps?

 

Benghazi!

Hillary's server!

Etc.

[ozimoron]

11 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Or perhaps declined out of fear of being pilloried by the Woke Left? The answer is of course simple. A woman is an adult human female.  What is so hard about that?

Her "woke" view of what a woman is could somehow disqualify her from the court?

[Mac Mickmanus]

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Not for the first time you insert your fixation with other people’s gender into your posts.

Is in inappropriate to mention that She is a She ?

[ozimoron]

4 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

...and in the rush to be the first to get their virtue signalle, Good Morning America managed to step on their own crank.

 

 

Care to provide a scintilla of evidence that her appointment is virtue signalling or that she is somehow less qualified than Trump's picks?

[ozimoron]

Same usual racist bigots on here complaining with a shred of argument about why she isn't suitable.

[Bluespunk]

3 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Well, out with it. Why do you think I objected?  Stop dancing around the turd. 

I already did so in an earlier post. 
 

Another poster has been blunter than myself. 
 

I’m sorry but I just don’t find your change of tack credible. 

It is what it is. 

 

[Mac Mickmanus]

1 minute ago, ozimoron said:

Same usual racist bigots on here complaining with a shred of argument about why she isn't suitable.

Was She chosen solely for her race and gender or was She the actual best qualified person for the job ?

[EVENKEEL]

7 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Because Fox news brain infection never sleeps?

 

Benghazi!

Hillary's server!

Etc.

Don't forget hunter's laptop, priceless videos and messages.

[ozimoron]

Just now, Mac Mickmanus said:

Was She chosen solely for her race and gender or was She the actual best qualified person for the job ?

Any evidence at all that she wasn't qualified? Any evidence that the last three picks were better qualified? Waiting...

[Hanaguma]

2 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

I already did so in an earlier post. 
 

Another poster has been blunter than myself. 
 

I’m sorry but I just don’t find your change of tack credible. 

It is what it is. 

 

Sorry, I am a thickie. Refresh my memory. What exactly are you accusing me of?

[Chomper Higgot]

5 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Is in inappropriate to mention that She is a She ?

It’s not her gender that has triggered all this rightwing outrage, refer racist meme posted and liked above.

[Hanaguma]

6 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Care to provide a scintilla of evidence that her appointment is virtue signalling or that she is somehow less qualified than Trump's picks?

The virtue signalling is on the part of the 'news' media, who in their rush to look appropriately woke published a wildly inaccurate and unintentionally hilarious tweet.

[Bluespunk]

1 minute ago, Hanaguma said:

Sorry, I am a thickie. Refresh my memory. What exactly are you accusing me of?

 

1 hour ago, Bluespunk said:

Ahh, poor you. A white man wasn’t chosen. Has that upset your philosophies …?

 

[Mac Mickmanus]

1 minute ago, ozimoron said:

Any evidence at all that she wasn't qualified? Any evidence that the last three picks were better qualified? Waiting...

I have no idea, that is why I asked the question .

If I knew the answer, I wouldn't have asked the question