Popular Post Hi from France Posted July 11, 2022 Popular Post Posted July 11, 2022 5 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said: As disgraceful and unacceptable as Johnson’s constant lying is Lying is common for politicians, the real issue with Johnson was more bull<deleted>ting that good old lying. And of course many other issues. Just take economy: Brexit has produced a situation where a 10%-plus devaluation of the pound (against the average of other leading currencies) has not even achieved a boost to exports. The whole country became 10% poorer, and got nothing in return. 7
UWEB Posted July 12, 2022 Posted July 12, 2022 I will miss the daily comedy of this clown, entertainment at its best. 1
NanLaew Posted July 12, 2022 Posted July 12, 2022 10 hours ago, Loiner said: 10 hours ago, NanLaew said: Not as guilty as the hundreds of photos of the multiple indiscretions at #10 have obviously portrayed. "regardless of what the police say." But still guilty though? Regardless of what anybody else may have done. Have you written to the police ombudsman yet? How about lodging a complaint with your local MP? As for me, I'm getting off this roundabout. 1
NanLaew Posted July 12, 2022 Posted July 12, 2022 10 hours ago, Bluespunk said: Why? It’s quite clear how he wishes to be identified. What’s confusing? Why the people of Bridgend voted for this drama queen Tory?
Kwasaki Posted July 12, 2022 Posted July 12, 2022 Children, children what's Bojo doing now. ???? Has he said the word resign yet. ????
NanLaew Posted July 12, 2022 Posted July 12, 2022 10 hours ago, ozimoron said: Are you just wanting to bash a transvestite or are you actually trying to make a cogent and socially acceptable point? He's not a transvestite but he was found guilty of failing to stop and report an accident after crashing his car. He was also found guilty of leaving his car in a dangerous position, but cleared of driving without due care and attention. 10 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said: Why did the report feel the need to mention "transgender " , why not just call him by his male name and refer to him as a male ? From eye-witness statements and ultimately, the arresting officer's report. The latter is why it was also mentioned in court. Jamie Wallis isn't exactly trying to hide his light under a bushel either. Case closed.
NanLaew Posted July 12, 2022 Posted July 12, 2022 8 minutes ago, Kwasaki said: Children, children what's Bojo doing now. ???? Has he said the word resign yet. ???? I have it on good authority that he's oiling the locks on his gun case. 1
transam Posted July 12, 2022 Posted July 12, 2022 16 hours ago, GroveHillWanderer said: You do understand that Starmer didn't commit an infraction, don't you? That's what it means when the police say that after conducting an investigation that was described as "thorough, detailed and proportionate" they "concluded that there is no case to answer...." This is of course, in complete contrast to the actions of Boris and his minions at Number 10 where after a similarly thorough investigation a total of 126 fixed penalty notices were issued. Keir Starmer and Angela Rayner cleared by Police I reckon that if the panel that fined Boris investigated beer Kier, there would probably have been a far different outcome.... 1 1
Popular Post Chomper Higgot Posted July 12, 2022 Popular Post Posted July 12, 2022 1 minute ago, transam said: I reckon that if the panel that fined Boris investigated beer Kier, there would probably have been a far different outcome.... How so, do they have a time machine that enables them to retroactively change the law and regulations applicable at the time the photos were taken? The Police have unequivocally stated: ‘No case to answer’. How simple to understand does it need to be in order to get through? 4
transam Posted July 12, 2022 Posted July 12, 2022 1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said: How so, do they have a time machine that enables them to retroactively change the law and regulations applicable at the time the photos were taken? The Police have unequivocally stated: ‘No case to answer’. How simple to understand does it need to be in order to get through? I know what "that" police force said, but you have ignored my post completely....????...????
Popular Post baboon Posted July 12, 2022 Popular Post Posted July 12, 2022 5 minutes ago, transam said: I know what "that" police force said, but you have ignored my post completely....????...???? How could he have ignored your nonsense when he just replied to it? 4 1
transam Posted July 12, 2022 Posted July 12, 2022 4 minutes ago, baboon said: How could he have ignored your nonsense when he just replied to it? Steady on ol' chap, he can speak for himself, without you interfering, but as you are here, go back and read my post, wiv the beer Kier photo, and give me your thoughts on my assumption. ???? 1
Popular Post baboon Posted July 12, 2022 Popular Post Posted July 12, 2022 1 minute ago, transam said: Steady on ol' chap, he can speak for himself, without you interfering, but as you are here, go back and read my post, wiv the beer Kier photo, and give me your thoughts on my assumption. ???? The man is innocent until you can provide evidence of police corruption, which you can't. Posting a photo of a man not breaking the law is not evidence. However it is spreading misinformation. 3
JonnyF Posted July 12, 2022 Posted July 12, 2022 27 minutes ago, baboon said: The man is innocent until you can provide evidence of police corruption, which you can't. Posting a photo of a man not breaking the law is not evidence. However it is spreading misinformation. Starmer was caught red handed. A politically biased police force decided not to fine him. It's clear as day. The electorate will simply see through this nonsense double standard and vote Conservative again. Sometimes honesty is the best policy, but Starmer would rather weasal out of it. We reap what we sow. Starmer is devoid of morals and hence, devoid of power. 1 1
baboon Posted July 12, 2022 Posted July 12, 2022 3 minutes ago, JonnyF said: Starmer was caught red handed. A politically biased police force decided not to fine him. It's clear as day. The electorate will simply see through this nonsense double standard and vote Conservative again. Sometimes honesty is the best policy, but Starmer would rather weasal out of it. We reap what we sow. Starmer is devoid of morals and hence, devoid of power. And your evidence is...? 2
transam Posted July 12, 2022 Posted July 12, 2022 37 minutes ago, baboon said: The man is innocent until you can provide evidence of police corruption, which you can't. Posting a photo of a man not breaking the law is not evidence. However it is spreading misinformation. That photo lead to an investigation, sunbeam, so it is relevant. Now back to my post about the "panel"....????
transam Posted July 12, 2022 Posted July 12, 2022 3 minutes ago, baboon said: And your evidence is...? How about the unmasked folk have a beer in the office.....????
Popular Post baboon Posted July 12, 2022 Popular Post Posted July 12, 2022 4 minutes ago, transam said: That photo lead to an investigation, sunbeam, so it is relevant. Now back to my post about the "panel"....???? An investigation that concluded there was no case to answer. Who are you quoting when you say "panel"? 2 1
baboon Posted July 12, 2022 Posted July 12, 2022 1 minute ago, transam said: How about the unmasked folk have a beer in the office.....???? How about them? 1
transam Posted July 12, 2022 Posted July 12, 2022 Just now, baboon said: An investigation that concluded there was no case to answer. Who are you quoting when uou say "panel"? You haven't understood my post or not read, time for you to stand down.....????
JonnyF Posted July 12, 2022 Posted July 12, 2022 4 minutes ago, baboon said: And your evidence is...? 1
transam Posted July 12, 2022 Posted July 12, 2022 Just now, JonnyF said: Baboon thinks he wasn't drinking it, and the 2 blokes having a cuddle wiv no masks are not really there..........???? 1
baboon Posted July 12, 2022 Posted July 12, 2022 2 minutes ago, transam said: You haven't understood my post or not read, time for you to stand down.....???? No. I don't want to and you can't make me. Not understood? Hardly. My reading ability is better than that of a four year old.
baboon Posted July 12, 2022 Posted July 12, 2022 13 minutes ago, transam said: Baboon thinks he wasn't drinking it, and the 2 blokes having a cuddle wiv no masks are not really there..........???? No case to answer, conclude the police force that took no action against Cummings to no outrage whatsoever among the Johnson cultists. 1
transam Posted July 12, 2022 Posted July 12, 2022 12 minutes ago, baboon said: No. I don't want to and you can't make me. Not understood? Hardly. My reading ability is better than that of a four year old. That's a plus......????
baboon Posted July 12, 2022 Posted July 12, 2022 1 minute ago, transam said: That's a plus......???? Who were you quoting when you said "panel"? 1
transam Posted July 12, 2022 Posted July 12, 2022 3 minutes ago, baboon said: Who were you quoting when you said "panel"? I give up...........????
Popular Post baboon Posted July 12, 2022 Popular Post Posted July 12, 2022 1 hour ago, JonnyF said: Starmer was caught red handed. A politically biased police force decided not to fine him. It's clear as day. The same politically biased police force that took no action against Johnson's sidekick for a Covid related offence. So who are they biased in favour of, then? 4
Popular Post Bluespunk Posted July 12, 2022 Popular Post Posted July 12, 2022 2 hours ago, transam said: I reckon that if the panel that fined Boris investigated beer Kier, there would probably have been a far different outcome.... Based on what evidence? Please provide a link to a credible source that proves this would be the case. 3
Popular Post RayC Posted July 12, 2022 Popular Post Posted July 12, 2022 1 hour ago, JonnyF said: Starmer was caught red handed. A politically biased police force decided not to fine him. That will be the same politically motivated police force that decided not to prosecute the revolutionary Marxist, Dominic Cummings? 4 1 1
Recommended Posts