Jump to content

PM spars with Move Forward MP during censure debate


Recommended Posts

Posted

Thai-PBS-World-logo-2022-07-19T165953.197.png

 

Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-Cha engaged in an animated verbal exchange, during the censure debate this morning (Thursday), with Move Forward MP Amarat Chokepamitkul, accusing the party of involvement in anti-Monarchy activities which, he said, he finds unacceptable.

 

Responding to this accusation, which was not specific, Amarat said that the prime minister should not have made such a serious remark without clarification and evidence and asked him to withdraw it, but he refused to do so.

 

House Speaker Chuan Leekpai then intervened, saying that the censure debate was getting heated and that there was no need for the prime minister to withdraw his accusation, but he warned both sides to be cautious about what they say.

 

Full Story: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/pm-spars-with-move-forward-mp-during-censure-debate/

 

Logo-top-.png

-- © Copyright Thai PBS 2022-07-21
 

- Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here.

 

Monthly car subscription with first-class insurance, 24x7 assistance and more in one price - click here to find out more!

  • Sad 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, bamnutsak said:

He must be desperate to play this card.

 

Sounds like Defamation to me.

 

 

He's had a hard week, must be getting time to spit the dummy out.

Posted
20 hours ago, ikke1959 said:

again section 112.....That is his weapon if he doesn't like things..But the person who is protected said that he did not want people punished by section 112..... Why is Mr Prayuth it using than so much?  With respect and mutual understanding a lot of things could be solved, Mr Prayuth can't have any critics or he feels terribly attacked 

Hard-wired tradition.

And we still struggle to get a handle on and comprehend the real crux. 

Forever, the cycling rhetoric.

Posted
8 hours ago, RichardColeman said:

Probably more like the entire party not allowed on the ballot box until the investigation has concluded, which will likely be after the next election. He's just whittling down the opposition 

What next elections?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...