Trump Booed at Arizona Rally Over His New Endorsement

 

Donald Trump faced blowback over one of his recent endorsements at his Friday evening rally in Prescott Valley, Arizona. “And a highly respected man, just endorsed by me today. Future congressman for the 2nd district Eli Crane,” Trump said before boos rang out from the crowd. The ex-president responded to the booing by apparently seeking some self-validation: “But you like me?” he asked.

 

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-booed-at-arizona-rally-over-new-congressional-endorsement-eli-crane

 

 

Another thing for him not to mention.

He also got booed several months ago when he took credit for the covid vaccines. He's since dropped mentioning that at rallies. A true leader!

Meanwhile liberal outlets ignore the whole country laughing at 'President' Biden ????

2 minutes ago, proton said:

Meanwhile liberal outlets ignore the whole country laughing at 'President' Biden ????

I'd like to say "nice try" but your deflection doesn't even rise to that level. So, I'm afraid I'm going to have to award you a "sad fail". I wonder if there's an emoji for that?

19 minutes ago, placeholder said:

I'd like to say "nice try" but your deflection doesn't even rise to that level. So, I'm afraid I'm going to have to award you a "sad fail". I wonder if there's an emoji for that?

Media still obsessed with Trump after all this time, now racking up the anti Trump hysteria just because he might run again. That is the real deflection from the abysmal failure in the White House now. 

1 minute ago, proton said:

Media still obsessed with Trump after all this time, now racking up the anti Trump hysteria just because he might run again. That is the real deflection from the abysmal failure in the White House now. 

So you're claiming that the Trump rally wasn't newsworthy? Would that were the case.

15 hours ago, proton said:

Media still obsessed with Trump after all this time, now racking up the anti Trump hysteria just because he might run again. That is the real deflection from the abysmal failure in the White House now. 

I agree the media should ignore Trump, ideally starting many years ago.  That would drive the man-child crazy.

I can imagine how furious the moron was! ????

To add insult to injury:

 

New York Post's editorial should worry Trump

 

"...a new editorial published by the New York Post, "Trump's silence on Jan. 6 is damning," should worry him, given the newspaper's reach with a loyal pro-Trump audience and its status as one of the crown jewels of Rupert Murdoch's media empire.

....another Murdoch publication, The Wall Street Journal, also slammed Trump in an editorial titled "The President Who Stood Still on Jan. 6."
The Journal wrote that, of all the condemnable behavior by Trump presented by the January 6 committee over the past several weeks, "most horrifying" was witnesses describing how "as the riot raged ... he sat watching TV, posting inflammatory tweets and refusing to send help.""

 

23 hours ago, proton said:

Media still obsessed with Trump after all this time, now racking up the anti Trump hysteria just because he might run again. That is the real deflection from the abysmal failure in the White House now. 

This is such an asinine comment on so many levels.  The media isn't obsessed with Trump.  It's Trump's obsession with being in the limelight.  I for one would have loved it if Trump had just accepted his defeat and disappeared from public view.  But he's refused to do that.  As for his criminal behavior, he absolutely needs to be held to account.  If his 800+ insurrectionists are being prosecuted, he sure as heck should be as well.    

Trump was booed because he didn’t endorse the extreme rightwing Q-Anon swivel eyed loon that the crowd want as their candidate.

This does not bode well for US politics and Tge direction the rightwing is heading.

2 hours ago, Berkshire said:

As for his criminal behavior, he absolutely needs to be held to account.  If his 800+ insurrectionists are being prosecuted, he sure as heck should be as well

The prima facia case for criminal intent HAS NOT been articulated against Trump during the J6 committee presentations. Maybe you can highlight a list of crimes committed by Trump and also who would you say conspired with Trump to commit these crimes? Where is the evidence?

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/3565615-last-chance-hearing-jan-6-committee-has-yet-to-establish-a-criminal-case-against-trump/

 

IMO, it's highly unlikely DT will be indicted and that being the case he will declare himself exonerated and treat the entire episode as a triumph. It is suggested he might even propose making Jan. 6th a holiday.

Trump is well supported.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-dominates-2024-gop-presidential-nomination-straw-poll-turning-point-usa-summit

5 minutes ago, lemmie said:

Trump is well supported.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-dominates-2024-gop-presidential-nomination-straw-poll-turning-point-usa-summit

He’s well supported by Fox News and the viewers of Fox News.

 

Tge same Fox News that refused to broadcast live coverage of the hearings.

 

 

8 minutes ago, lemmie said:

The prima facia case for criminal intent HAS NOT been articulated against Trump during the J6 committee presentations. Maybe you can highlight a list of crimes committed by Trump and also who would you say conspired with Trump to commit these crimes? Where is the evidence?

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/3565615-last-chance-hearing-jan-6-committee-has-yet-to-establish-a-criminal-case-against-trump/

 

IMO, it's highly unlikely DT will be indicted and that being the case he will declare himself exonerated and treat the entire episode as a triumph. It is suggested he might even propose making Jan. 6th a holiday.

The J6 hearings have painstakingly detailed all that happened and has virtually spelled-out Trump's culpability.  If you don't agree.....well it's certainly your right.  There's no guarantee that Trump will be indicted for this, or in Georgia.  But I put the odds of either one or both happening at about 90%.   

26 minutes ago, lemmie said:

The prima facia case for criminal intent HAS NOT been articulated against Trump during the J6 committee presentations. Maybe you can highlight a list of crimes committed by Trump and also who would you say conspired with Trump to commit these crimes? Where is the evidence?

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/3565615-last-chance-hearing-jan-6-committee-has-yet-to-establish-a-criminal-case-against-trump/

 

IMO, it's highly unlikely DT will be indicted and that being the case he will declare himself exonerated and treat the entire episode as a triumph. It is suggested he might even propose making Jan. 6th a holiday.

That’s what Grand Juries are for.

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

That’s what Grand Juries are for.

Grand jury, what grand jury are you referring to?

1 hour ago, lemmie said:

Grand jury, what grand jury are you referring to?

There's one in Georgia about 2020 elections. Others may follow....

1 hour ago, candide said:

There's one in Georgia about 2020 elections. Others may follow....

If you are referring to the special grand jury created in January 2022, to assist in collecting testimony as part of a criminal investigation into Trump, there won't be any indictments forthcoming from this as it does not have the authority to issue criminal indictments but can issue subpoenas for witness testimony, documents, etc created for that purpose, mainly in response of some witness's telling the DA to pound sound. Now she can (assuming she /DA Willis isn't recused) compel them with a special g jury subpoena but cannot indict anyone. This will likely go nowhere as there is no evidence, just listen to and analyze what Trump said in the call. It is another nothing burger, why else has he not been indicted, the call he made is old news now.

Edited July 25, 20223 yr by lemmie

5 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

He’s well supported by Fox News and the viewers of Fox News.

With some notable exceptions:

 

Fox News anchor Bret Baier slams Trump, saying January 6 hearings made him look 'horrific'

3 hours ago, lemmie said:

Grand jury, what grand jury are you referring to?

The DoJ has requested and has received transcripts if all testimony given under oath to the J6 Hearings.

 

Now for what rational reasons might they collect this testimony?

37 minutes ago, lemmie said:

If you are referring to the special grand jury created in January 2022, to assist in collecting testimony as part of a criminal investigation into Trump, there won't be any indictments forthcoming from this as it does not have the authority to issue criminal indictments but can issue subpoenas for witness testimony, documents, etc created for that purpose, mainly in response of some witness's telling the DA to pound sound. Now she can (assuming she /DA Willis isn't recused) compel them with a special g jury subpoena but cannot indict anyone. This will likely go nowhere as there is no evidence, just listen to and analyze what Trump said in the call. It is another nothing burger, why else has he not been indicted, the call he made is old news now.

Immediately after you left off highlighting, it says that the special grand jury may make criminal referrals to the DoJ as it sees fit, as can the J6 committee.

39 minutes ago, lemmie said:

If you are referring to the special grand jury created in January 2022, to assist in collecting testimony as part of a criminal investigation into Trump, there won't be any indictments forthcoming from this as it does not have the authority to issue criminal indictments but can issue subpoenas for witness testimony, documents, etc created for that purpose, mainly in response of some witness's telling the DA to pound sound. Now she can (assuming she /DA Willis isn't recused) compel them with a special g jury subpoena but cannot indict anyone. This will likely go nowhere as there is no evidence, just listen to and analyze what Trump said in the call. It is another nothing burger, why else has he not been indicted, the call he made is old news now.

Hope springs eternal

42 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Hope springs eternal

Exactly, u can always have eternal hope for a criminal referral, ANY referral at this time in spite of zero evidence, multiple hearings, television presentations, special grand juries, there is always some thread of hope, just not much, sadly for some.

Edited July 25, 20223 yr by lemmie

43 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Immediately after you left off highlighting, it says that the special grand jury may make criminal referrals to the DoJ as it sees fit, as can the J6 committee.

You seem forget something, if there was all this evidence after 18 months some of the MAGA extraordinaire's would be on trial, what's the hold up! The entire liberal cabal have a massive hatred going on here and they would prosecute Trump for jay-walking if they could but so far they have presented no evidence of a crime and well, that's how criminal justice works in America, no evidence, no predicate, = no prosecution. But, they still got Bannon, first conviction for contempt of congress in 50 or so years. Take a victory lap and maybe change your vote to Trump in 2024?

 

3 minutes ago, lemmie said:

You seem forget something, if there was all this evidence after 18 months some of the MAGA extraordinaire's would be on trial, what's the hold up! The entire liberal cabal have a massive hatred going on here and they would prosecute Trump for jay-walking if they could but so far they have presented no evidence of a crime and well, that's how criminal justice works in America, no evidence, no predicate, = no prosecution. But, they still got Bannon, first conviction for contempt of congress in 50 or so years. Take a victory lap and maybe change your vote to Trump in 2024?

 

How long did it take Ken Starr to investigate Clinton without coming up with any substantive charges? It was several years. There never were any on the original complaint.

11 minutes ago, lemmie said:

You seem forget something, if there was all this evidence after 18 months some of the MAGA extraordinaire's would be on trial, what's the hold up! The entire liberal cabal have a massive hatred going on here and they would prosecute Trump for jay-walking if they could but so far they have presented no evidence of a crime and well, that's how criminal justice works in America, no evidence, no predicate, = no prosecution. But, they still got Bannon, first conviction for contempt of congress in 50 or so years. Take a victory lap and maybe change your vote to Trump in 2024?

 

You have done well as brand new member to find your way directly to the World News sub-forum.

 

And unusually for for most, but not all, brand new members, you’ve jumped straight into the controversial  topics with outlandish prophecies.

 

I do hope you stick around long enough to see reality as it continues to unfold.

Trump gets booed everywhere he goes .......   obviously not well liked by many Americans. 

What about Lindsey Graham .... ?   he seems to have a common sense approach about issues and he speaks his mind.

I think he would make a decent President ....    imo

4 minutes ago, steven100 said:

Trump gets booed everywhere he goes .......   obviously not well liked by many Americans. 

What about Lindsey Graham .... ?   he seems to have a common sense approach about issues and he speaks his mind.

I think he would make a decent President ....    imo

Graham won't even consider nominating while Trump is still on the scene. After Trump insulted Graham's wife he became his biggest sycophant. For this reason alone he'd never get elected. The GOP will win with Trump, De Santis or nobody.

13 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Graham won't even consider nominating while Trump is still on the scene. After Trump insulted Graham's wife he became his biggest sycophant. For this reason alone he'd never get elected. The GOP will win with Trump, De Santis or nobody.

well all I can say is .......  God help America     !!