Jump to content

Disgraced Prince Andrew heckled at Queen Elizabeth’s funeral procession


Recommended Posts

Posted
19 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

What "justice" is there for him to "face" that he is not facing?  Are you suggesting that he's been indicted for something?

Surely, Andy boy agreeing to pay $21 million USD in compensation is an admission of guilt! Why otherwise would he agree?

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

He was never accused of having sex with underage girls, because by her own admission she was 17 years old at the time and the legal age of consent in the location that the alleged event took place is 16 years old.

I’m not sure you understand the law on this matter.

 

His victim was an American, and was trafficked for the proposed of sex.

 

Regardless, my statement is still correct, Prince Andrew was credibility accused, Refer court filing I have posted.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
23 hours ago, DaLa said:

'Public respect' , at your mother's funeral procession ?

Respect should only be given to people who deserve it.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, 2baht said:

So why did he agree to pay her $21 million USD???

The crime, and it was a crime in the US, was committed on US soil.  

Posted
Just now, Credo said:

The crime, and it was a crime in the US, was committed on US soil.  

Does it matter where it was? It's an admission of guilt in any language!

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

I understand the law, and her nationality has nothing to do with it. The alleged offence took place in the UK where the legal age of consent is 16. She doesn't take American laws with her around the world to implement in her country of choice.

 

Allegedly trafficked for sex. Never proven in a court of law. Many, myself included believe that she was a fully cooperative participant who later saw an opportunity to make millions of pounds by fleecing a Royal by pretending she was trafficked when in fact she was working as a high class escort and was by her own admission, helping to recruit other girls.

 

Either way, she was over legal age of consent when the alleged event took place and Andrew was never accused or convicted of having underage sex so calling him a nonce is inaccurate.

"Ms Giuffre, now 38, claimed the duke, 61, sexually assaulted her on three occasions when she was 17 at Ghislaine Maxwell's home in London, in Epstein's mansion in New York and on Epstein's private island in the US Virgin Islands." From BBC.

It's been a while since New York was located in the UK.

Yes, allegedly, but still credible.

Edited by stevenl
  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, 2baht said:

Twenty one million US dollars, yeah, ok. That's twenty one million US dollars! At least he did'nt sweat! ????

Do you have any idea of the wealth of the Royal family?

 

That's like you paying 50 quid. Of someone else's money ????.

 

Of course he's going to pay it. That's exactly why she accused him. Like taking candy from a baby.

Posted
1 minute ago, JonnyF said:

Do you have any idea of the wealth of the Royal family?

 

That's like you paying 50 quid. Of someone else's money ????.

 

Of course he's going to pay it. That's exactly why she accused him. Like taking candy from a baby.

????????Onya Jonny!

Posted
1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

Alleged crime.

 

Accused, never convicted.

Ah, and it's only alleged because the perpetrator would not travel to the US to attend court and extraditing a member of the royal family could be a bit tricky.  But the sum he paid out pretty much tells the story.

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 hour ago, 2baht said:

Does it matter where it was? It's an admission of guilt in any language!

Loads of cases never come to court because "settled out of court". As for the amount, I think it was excessive, but I wasn't in the room to know why.

Perhaps they looked at the Michael Jackson case where a payment was made to make a claim go away, and the suspect IMO reneged in hopes of more, so they had to give enough to make sure that didn't happen.

BTW anyone that followed the Jackson case knows why it's better to pay to stay out of the IMO circus of trial by media.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, JonnyF said:

I understand the law, and her nationality has nothing to do with it. The alleged offence took place in the UK where the legal age of consent is 16. She doesn't take American laws with her around the world to implement in her country of choice.

 

Allegedly trafficked for sex. Never proven in a court of law. Many, myself included believe that she was a fully cooperative participant who later saw an opportunity to make millions of pounds by fleecing a Royal by pretending she was trafficked when in fact she was working as a high class escort and was by her own admission, helping to recruit other girls.

 

Either way, she was over legal age of consent when the alleged event took place and Andrew was never accused or convicted of having underage sex so calling him a nonce is inaccurate.

You clear do not understand the law, certainly not US Federal (extra territorial) Law as it relates to trafficking US citizens for sex and the age of consent to engage in paid sex (regardless of who is doing the paying).

 

 

 

 

Edited by Chomper Higgot
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You clear do not understand the law, certainly not US Federal Law as it relates to trafficking US citizens for sex and the age of consent to engage in paid sex (regardless of who is doing the paying).

 

 

Got a link for that, to enlighten us.....?

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Surely IF sleeping with trafficked girls was a crime the American VVIPs that slept with Jeffrey's trafficked girls would all be under investigation? After all, the authorities have the complete client list, indeed it is widely available on the web. Serious crimes like trafficking/slavery do still get investigated right? Is there a valid reason why out of all the elite people that slept with Jeffrey's trafficked girls Price Andrew is the only guilty guy? 

Whataboutary.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

The alleged incident that we were discussing (when she was 17) occurred in London, which is in the UK.

 

I am sure you are aware of the legal precedent, Innocent until proven guilty.

It doesn’t matter, she was a US citizen trafficked out of the US for sex.

 

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...