Jump to content

Man Murdered Wife, Shot Daughter After Being Sucked Down ‘Q Rabbit Hole,’ Family Confirms


Recommended Posts

Posted
Picture of a snake in the shape of a letter Q and the slogan "where we go one we go all"

 

A Michigan man’s obsession with the pro-Trump QAnon conspiracy theory culminated in a Sunday incident in which he murdered his wife and badly injured one of his children, his daughter told The Daily Beast.

 

Igor Lanis, a 53-year-old resident of the Michigan city of Walled Lake, was killed Sunday by police after he started shooting at them with a shotgun, according to the Oakland County Sheriff’s Office.

 

The Oakland County Sheriff’s Office said in a statement that the injured child, a 25-year-old woman, managed to call police around 4:11 a.m. after being shot by her father.

 

https://www.thedailybeast.com/igor-lanis-murdered-wife-shot-daughter-after-being-sucked-down-qanon-rabbit-hole-family-says?fbclid=IwAR2Ex80txphSljq6epYz_eBRQbHAiSRcXySx5YyJAe85-mB0VTwm1HA4w00

 

File:The Daily Beast logo.png

 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

how Q-addicts lose the plot and destroy relationships around them.

I don't understand .... what is Q-Rabbit    ?    you've lost me '

  • Like 1
Posted
16 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Extremism of any kind is dangerous. The article is clearly a tool to attack the ex President yet again, and those that support the popular America first agenda, by misrepresenting violence as being only from these Q nutcases/Trump supporters which is false. A balanced article would clearly state there have also been many deaths and serious injury at BLM protests, as well as burns no doubt.

You could have written: Yes, there are millions of Q nutcases who also support the constant lies of the traitor. But no, for you it's only important that those are not the only nutcases in the USA.

Good luck with your democracy, the best money can buy, over there.

  • Like 1
  • Love It 1
Posted (edited)
On 9/13/2022 at 7:30 AM, SunnyinBangrak said:

Extremism of any kind is dangerous. The article is clearly a tool to attack the ex President yet again, and those that support the popular America first agenda, by misrepresenting violence as being only from these Q nutcases/Trump supporters which is false. A balanced article would clearly state there have also been many deaths and serious injury at BLM protests, as well as burns no doubt.

With regards to ‘a balanced article’, I’m more aligned with some of the other replies: it would be off-topic and contrived.

 

 

Edited by onthedarkside
comments on moderation removed
Posted
21 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Mass psychosis at work.

Mass psychosis he says.

 

Yes, if only it was confined to the right-wing fringe of the US. You know, as opposed to being ripe in the supposedly ‘better-educated’ part of the political spectrum…
 

…all those non-psychotic decent ‘liberal-minded’ people who genuinely advocate extreme anti-science BS about basic human biology.

 

And those lovely individuals who genuinely believe in conspiracy of a Racist Patriarchy.

Posted
22 hours ago, kwonitoy said:

And somehow you can twist a horrible tragedy into a but what about BLM

Not all BLM members are unhinged violent, looting criminals.

 

Now, for the benefit of some other more excitable posters above, this self-evident statement can easily be applied in many different relevant contexts. Here we go:

 

Not all Republicans are Trump supporters

Not all Trump voters are ‘baaaad’ - he was one of two choices

Not all Trump supporters are Q-Anon believers

Not all Q-Anon believers are hardcore

Not all hardcore Q-Anon believers are violent

Not all violet nutcases are murderers.

Posted
20 hours ago, Credo said:

How wrong you are.  First, BLM is not a cult and it's not based on conspiracies.  Second, you might want to look at the number of acts of violence in the name of Trump:

I can’t see where he said they were a cult in the strict sense of the word, or a conspiracy. 

 

20 hours ago, Credo said:

Second, you might want to look at the number of acts of violence in the name of Trump:

Why? Who said they were low / high? And what good would it do to try and add up acts of violence ‘in the name of’ some other thing…e.g. BLM was mentioned.

Posted
On 9/13/2022 at 9:29 AM, Gluuay yai said:

 A tool to attack trump? You've got to be kidding. Q is almost his baby. He constantly endorses it. If he was such a great guy he would be telling nutcases to drop off or not believe in Q conspiracies.

 

 

‘The news source preferred by political / cultural opponents is not worth watching so I’ll stick to my own silly echo-chamber biases’…all the while suggesting others of doing the same.

 

Posted
4 hours ago, heybruce said:

The old-school Republicans are not the RINOs.  The current Republican party is a RINO.

I thought it's more like a herd of buffaloes. ????????????

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Atlantis said:

Not all BLM members are unhinged violent, looting criminals.

 

Now, for the benefit of some other more excitable posters above, this self-evident statement can easily be applied in many different relevant contexts. Here we go:

 

Not all Republicans are Trump supporters

Not all Trump voters are ‘baaaad’ - he was one of two choices

Not all Trump supporters are Q-Anon believers

Not all Q-Anon believers are hardcore

Not all hardcore Q-Anon believers are violent

Not all violet nutcases are murderers.

 

Wow, that wasn’t so hard was it!

Thanks for stating the obvious.  We can say that people who fall for the Nigerian scam are not all idiots.  They just seem like they are.  Same with Trump supporters. 

  • Like 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Atlantis said:

Not all Q-Anon believers are hardcore

 

What does it mean for a QAnon believer not to be hardcore? Are there some beliefs special to QAnon that are rational and evidence based?

  • Like 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
16 hours ago, Atlantis said:

Not all BLM members are unhinged violent, looting criminals.

 

Now, for the benefit of some other more excitable posters above, this self-evident statement can easily be applied in many different relevant contexts. Here we go:

 

Not all Republicans are Trump supporters

Not all Trump voters are ‘baaaad’ - he was one of two choices

Not all Trump supporters are Q-Anon believers

Not all Q-Anon believers are hardcore

Not all hardcore Q-Anon believers are violent

Not all violet nutcases are murderers.

 

Wow, that wasn’t so hard was it!

 

Talk about setting lax standards. Less than 100% is negligible? What percentage to your way of thinking would be cause for concern?

 

Anyway, it looks like if someone is going to believe in Donald Trump, they're obliged to believe in MAGA and The Storm.

 

Trump Embraces QAnon ‘Storm is Coming’ Meme: ‘It’s Almost Like He’s Trying to Tell Us Something

 

Ex-president Donald Trump went on a “Retruthing” spree on Truth Social Monday night into Tuesday that prominently included a QAnon meme featuring his image, wearing a Q pin on his lapel, over the messages “the storm is coming” and “WWG1WGA.”

His retruth (the Truth Social equivalent of a retweet) is his most direct embrace of QAnon’s conspiracy theory focusing on him since the launch of his Truth Social. 

The “storm” is a reference to the Q conspiracy theorist community’s belief that sooner or later Trump is going to unveil or unleash his secret plan to defeat all the enemies of MAGA and the deep state and, presumably, return to power in a sweaty Mike Lindell dream come to life.

 

image.png.59fbc543d8535da6f0ae321f28d9f4f6.png

https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-embraces-qanon-storm-is-coming-meme-its-almost-like-hes-trying-to-tell-us-something/

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, placeholder said:

What does it mean for a QAnon believer not to be hardcore? Are there some beliefs special to QAnon that are rational and evidence based?

Just Mediocre to low level tin foil hat conspiracy nut I guess? You would have to start what is the least ridiculous Qanon belief I guess and go from there lol.

 The fact that he would even make a statement like that pretty much tells you all you need to know IMHO. ????

Edited by Gluuay yai

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...