Jump to content

Hunter Biden could be charged with tax crimes


Scott

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, bocaBob said:

Transparency, truth, facts, it should be a priority for all. Surely you don't have a problem with the truth? Joe Biden is an elected govt official working for the people and owes nothing less than full transparency to the people. If a prima facia case of the Biden pay for play scheme is brought forth during congressional oversight investigations of Hunter Biden, people have right to know.

 

"Transparency, truth, facts, it should be a priority for all."

 

Tell that to Trump and his supporters.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More off topic posts and replies to those have been removed. I'd strongly encourage posters here to heed the prior warning above given by another moderator, as follows:

 

"Off-topic posts removed.  The topic is about Hunter Biden.  Henceforth, troll posts WILL earn suspensions.  You have been warned."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

from the quoted news source:

"Hunter Biden has long been a target of scrutiny from conservatives, who have alleged that his overseas business dealings indicate a pattern of corruption.
Republicans have vowed to investigate him in the House of Representatives if they win a majority of seats in next month's midterm congressional elections."

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63166809

 

The tax problems for Hunter are the least of the problems he and his ... father and family will face when congress puts Tony Bobulinski on the stand and the banks that flagged 150 Biden bank transactions!

Edited by onthedarkside
unsupported/unsubstantiated claim removed
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, michael87 said:

from the quoted news source:

"Hunter Biden has long been a target of scrutiny from conservatives, who have alleged that his overseas business dealings indicate a pattern of corruption.
Republicans have vowed to investigate him in the House of Representatives if they win a majority of seats in next month's midterm congressional elections."

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63166809

 

The tax problems for Hunter are the least of the problems he and his ... father and family will face when congress puts Tony Bobulinski on the stand and the banks that flagged 150 Biden bank transactions!

As I posted earlier Bobulinski made allegations about the Bidens that he claims were supported by data in 3 mobile phones. Reporters from Rupert Murdoch's Wall Street Journal were given access to those phones. They found nothing that tied Joe Biden to any of Bobulinski's allegations.

As for banks flagging transactions, by itself that means very little. It's not uncommon where large amounts of cash are transferred. Banks do this to protect themselves from charges of abetting money laundering.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, michael87 said:

from the quoted news source:

"Hunter Biden has long been a target of scrutiny from conservatives, who have alleged that his overseas business dealings indicate a pattern of corruption.
Republicans have vowed to investigate him in the House of Representatives if they win a majority of seats in next month's midterm congressional elections."

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63166809

 

The tax problems for Hunter are the least of the problems he and his ... father and family will face when congress puts Tony Bobulinski on the stand and the banks that flagged 150 Biden bank transactions!

Lol! Hunter is currently investigated by a Prosecutor appointed by Trump. What can the house find that the current investigation cannot find. In brief, the Republucans have nothing, they just want to make a show.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The noose around the neck of Hunter Biden and the Biden family is tightening. This is not going to end well for the Bidens. They are in it up to their eyeballs and it's only a matter of time now before the whistle-blowers seal their fate.

FBI has 'voluminous evidence' of Hunter Biden's 'potential criminal conduct': Whistleblowers

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-criminal-fbi-investigation-whistleblower-ukraine-china

 

 

Edited by onthedarkside
off topic and unsubstantiated comments removed
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, g man said:

The noose around the neck of Hunter Biden and the Biden family is tightening. This is not going to end well for the Bidens. They are in it up to their eyeballs and it's only a matter of time now before the whistle-blowers seal their fate.

FBI has 'voluminous evidence' of Hunter Biden's 'potential criminal conduct': Whistleblowers

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-criminal-fbi-investigation-whistleblower-ukraine-china

 

 

If it weren't coming from Grassley, it would be more credible! ????

Anyway, if Hunter has committed any offense, let's convict him. No problem.

Edited by candide
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, candide said:

If it weren't coming from Grassley, it would be more credible! ????

Anyway, if Hunter has committed any offense, let's convict him. No problem.

And perhaps investigate exactly why these foreigners were paying him all those millions of $s?  I will go right ahead and make the assumption that the people paying Hunter the millions of $ expected to get something in return for their money. I wonder what that was?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

And perhaps investigate exactly why these foreigners were paying him all those millions of $s?  I will go right ahead and make the assumption that the people paying Hunter the millions of $ expected to get something in return for their money. I wonder what that was?

They probably did expect something in return for Hunter being the son of Joe Biden. The issue is whether they got anything. The attempt to tie Biden to a quid pro quo in the Burisma case has long since been exploded. Except possibly for those who trust Rudolph Giuliani's 2 criminal witnesses who were working for Oleg Deripaska, who was the middleman between Paul Manafort and the Russian govt. He is currently fighting extradition to the United States. 

Their relationship recovered, however, and Deripaska has been described as "Putin's favorite industrialist".[119] Leaked U.S. diplomatic cables from 2006 described Deripaska as "among the 2–3 oligarchs Putin turns to on a regular basis" and "a more-or-less permanent fixture on Putin's trips abroad".[120]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oleg_Deripaska

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, placeholder said:

They probably did expect something in return for Hunter being the son of Joe Biden. The issue is whether they got anything. The attempt to tie Biden to a quid pro quo in the Burisma case has long since been exploded. Except possibly for those who trust Rudolph Giuliani's 2 criminal witnesses who were working for Oleg Deripaska, who was the middleman between Paul Manafort and the Russian govt. He is currently fighting extradition to the United States. 

Their relationship recovered, however, and Deripaska has been described as "Putin's favorite industrialist".[119] Leaked U.S. diplomatic cables from 2006 described Deripaska as "among the 2–3 oligarchs Putin turns to on a regular basis" and "a more-or-less permanent fixture on Putin's trips abroad".[120]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oleg_Deripaska

We know they got something in return. We have known for years.

 

Contrary to repeated false claims by the left that Joe never met or discussed business with Hunter or Hunter's associates, White House records show this to be a lie. Nothing to fear, nothing to hide is frequently written on this forum. Might it be applicable here?

 

"Joe Biden hosted a White House meeting with two Chinese energy executives with ties to his son Hunter back when he was vice president in 2014, records show.

The president, who still insists he never spoke to Hunter about his son’s overseas business dealings, met the two executives from Wanxiang — a major Chinese company — in the West Wing on July 25, 2014, according to White House visitor logs."

https://nypost.com/2022/08/05/joe-biden-met-chinese-energy-execs-with-ties-to-hunter-in-2014/

 

"Two of Hunter’s Mexican business associates, Miguel Aleman Velasco and Miguel Aleman Magnani visited the West Wing on Feb. 26, 2014, according to the Obama White House visitor logs, and Joe was later photographed with Hunter giving Velasco and Magnani a tour of the White House Brady Press Briefing room."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/joe-biden-met-14-hunters-business-associates-vice-president

 

So now the democrat big lie is thoroughly debunked. Joe Biden DID meet with these people the left swore he did not meet, and let us remember so sure were the left that Joe did not meet any of these people(although we already knew he did thanks to Hunter's laptop) that they censored truthful statements and only permitted lies that helped the democrat party. That is very sad indeed. Time is right to ask why were these meetings taking place? Why the need to lie and deny them?

 

 

Edited by onthedarkside
misinfo claims removed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

And perhaps investigate exactly why these foreigners were paying him all those millions of $s?  I will go right ahead and make the assumption that the people paying Hunter the millions of $ expected to get something in return for their money. I wonder what that was?

I'm sure these people expected something in return.  However I'm not aware of Hunter Biden delivering anything of significance.  That makes Hunter a hustler, just like Trump.

 

"Grip and grin" photo ops with a Vice President does not count as anything of substance.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Grassley wrote. "That same document notes that as of July 2017 the money still had not been transferred and James Biden considered calling CEFC officials and threatening to withdraw Biden family support from future deals.”

Hmmm, I do believe Joe Biden is a member of the Biden family.

Maybe he (James Biden) can confirm this statement about Biden family support under oath to congress, just to clarify and misunderstanding and Joe's role in all this.

Wow, could be big problems for the Bidens.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-criminal-fbi-investigation-whistleblower-ukraine-china

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, placeholder said:

The issue is whether they got anything.

exactly what congress needs to determine from the Biden's during confessional oversight investigations planned for a GOP controlled house. Maybe Hunter Biden can avoid a suboeana to testify if he is under indictment for tax and firearm felonies.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, g man said:

Grassley wrote. "That same document notes that as of July 2017 the money still had not been transferred and James Biden considered calling CEFC officials and threatening to withdraw Biden family support from future deals.”

Hmmm, I do believe Joe Biden is a member of the Biden family.

Maybe he (James Biden) can confirm this statement under oath to congress. Wow, could be big problems for the Bidens.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-criminal-fbi-investigation-whistleblower-ukraine-china

What we have here is a spelling problem. J-A-M-E-S is not how you spell Joe. Also, James considered it but apparently didn't actually do it. I'm not sure that "considering" would qualify as a crime.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

We know they got something in return. We have known for years.

 

Contrary to repeated false claims by the left that Joe never met or discussed business with Hunter or Hunter's associates, White House records show this to be a lie. Nothing to fear, nothing to hide is frequently written on this forum. Might it be applicable here?

 

"Joe Biden hosted a White House meeting with two Chinese energy executives with ties to his son Hunter back when he was vice president in 2014, records show.

The president, who still insists he never spoke to Hunter about his son’s overseas business dealings, met the two executives from Wanxiang — a major Chinese company — in the West Wing on July 25, 2014, according to White House visitor logs."

https://nypost.com/2022/08/05/joe-biden-met-chinese-energy-execs-with-ties-to-hunter-in-2014/

 

"Two of Hunter’s Mexican business associates, Miguel Aleman Velasco and Miguel Aleman Magnani visited the West Wing on Feb. 26, 2014, according to the Obama White House visitor logs, and Joe was later photographed with Hunter giving Velasco and Magnani a tour of the White House Brady Press Briefing room."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/joe-biden-met-14-hunters-business-associates-vice-president

 

So now the democrat big lie is thoroughly debunked. Joe Biden DID meet with these people the left swore he did not meet, and let us remember so sure were the left that Joe did not meet any of these people(although we already knew he did thanks to Hunter's laptop) that they censored truthful statements and only permitted lies that helped the democrat party. That is very sad indeed. Time is right to ask why were these meetings taking place? Why the need to lie and deny them?

 

 

So, if true (remember It's from NYPost and Fox News) they got a meeting and a handshake. Big deal!

Have they got a procurement from the government which Joe could have influenced? No. Have they got a suspect authorisation Joe could have influenced? No! 

In brief, you have nothing!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...