Jump to content

Chief engineer not on board the ill-fated Sukhothai navy vessel


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

26DCB231-F592-4A77-91ED-8269299017D6.jpeg

 

The ill-fated HTMS Sukhothai set sail into rough seas heading for Chumphon on December 18th without its chief engineer, Vice Admiral Pichai Lorchusakul, commander of the First Naval Area Command, told the media on yesterday (Saturday).

 

He said that the ship normally had a complement of 106, but the chief engineer, who he declined to name, had business to attend to onshore and was not aboard HTMS Sukhothai on December 18th adding. If the chief engineer is absent, his deputy takes charge of overseeing the ship’s engines, he explained.

 

He also said that the captain of the ship, whose name has alsonot been disclosed, will be the person questioned about the loss of the vessel by the Royal Thai Navy’s investigators.

 

Full Story: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/chief-engineer-not-on-board-the-ill-fated-sukhothai-navy-vessel/

 

Logo-top-.png

-- © Copyright Thai PBS 2023-01-02
 

- Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here.

 

Monthly car subscription with first-class insurance, 24x7 assistance and more in one price - click here to find out more!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Akin to let a passenger plane fly across continent with just the first officer in command, Thailand it's seems can afford it's self to lose a battleship and a bunch of young soldiers and then try sweep everything under the carpet...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, internationalism said:

"He also said that the captain of the ship, whose name has also not been disclosed"

 

foreign press have disclosed already his name - Lieutenant Colonel Pichitchai Tuannadee. Bangkok Post spells his surname Tuennadee.

But certainly it's not easy to find out his name, as it was a military secret. Why his commanders still do so?

 

his fb is https://www.facebook.com/pichitchai.kittyman/

but there is nothing there since this tragedy.

Looks, like his was specialising on fb in selling protective talismans.

Part of profits were going to charities, underprivileged children and temples. But only part of those profits.

That one is from 2.12.22, but there are many more similar posts. 

https://www.facebook.com/pichitchai.kittyman/posts/pfbid02Mku4kbn7baPUWGKvqSmmTNEXNVnQ3gesbtKwHroWvuA5wwVUVDqP85GHWSsiR9jgl

 

November

https://www.facebook.com/pichitchai.kittyman/posts/pfbid0272mPqXzkpZGSByRH3KxvLazuhoBG6L16oGQGKKUj8csE3YteLWNLZfayM5nTPzadl

 

So he was more occupied with spiritual protection, than the real one for him and his subordinates.

Possibly he was a religious nut, just looking at this fb page 

I guess the resale value of the talismans he's selling has plummeted since failing miserably to prevent the sinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ezzra said:

Akin to let a passenger plane fly across continent with just the first officer in command, Thailand it's seems can afford it's self to lose a battleship and a bunch of young soldiers and then try sweep everything under the carpet...

The Chief Engineer does not stand watches at sea, neither will his deputy the 2nd Engineer. Day-to-day responsibility for engine room watches at sea falls to 3rd engineer and below.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, VocalNeal said:

The Chief Engineer does not stand watches at sea, neither will his deputy the 2nd Engineer. Day-to-day responsibility for engine room watches at sea falls to 3rd engineer and below.

Some do depends on the vessel and the company. Anyway they are always supposed to be there. They are supposed to be the expert on the maintenance of the ship, that includes structural integrity. I wouldn't really blame the chief. If he had reported the vessel unfit to sail I daresay no one would have listened and he would have been disciplined for making his superiors look bad.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/2/2023 at 5:48 AM, snoop1130 said:

He said that the ship normally had a complement of 106, but the chief engineer, who he declined to name, had business to attend to onshore and was not aboard HTMS Sukhothai on December 18th adding. If the chief engineer is absent, his deputy takes charge of overseeing the ship’s engines, he explained.

Maybe he had a premonition.. or knew more.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

if it was a scheduled sailing, not an emergency, there should not be any reason why any of the crew were no onboard.  They knew the sailing time, so any business should have been resolved beforehand.

White wash an cover-up being prepared.  The influential and important are taking care to keep out f this.

Will the captain be questioned in public hearings or all kept behind closed doors.

Are we sure there wasn't a Burmese fishing boat in the area?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/2/2023 at 10:58 AM, lujanit said:

A coverup has been underway since the ship sank and the men responsible for the death of so many innocent sailors will not be charged.  Those in higher places will blame scapegoats.  This is the Thai way.

Quite so. The Captain should have been arrested immediately and interrogated?

Lets them try and  blame a couple of Burmese on this tragedy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...