Jump to content

Looks like the BOT is buying the baht again


Recommended Posts

Some of these western travelers made plans for a Thailand vacation when it was 5-8% higher.  And just a few months ago it was 38 now 34.   Ouch.  That's quite a few less massages for the typical 1500usd spend on a vacation. 

Edited by Elkski
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jerno said:

Yes it seems.  But they need to be careful that they don't get  onto the USA currency manipulation watch list (again).

And who watches the USA currency manipulation?

Every country in the world does what it can to protect the currency. Last year when Liz Truss tanked the pound the BOE intervened. Didn't see any threads on UK currency manipulation then.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, KhunBENQ said:

Something is suspicious.

EUR/THB nosediving while EUR/USD is not that bad.

 

Screenshot_20230105_083955_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20230105_084015_Chrome.jpg

Yes I picked up on the same issue a couple of days ago.  AUD plunged in a straight line against the THB but not against the USD.  BOT is definitely manipulating the baht. I suspect it is just profiteering to keep the baht high during the arrival of the Russian invasion.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Gottfrid said:

That is just because the connection between USD and THB has gotten weaker than before.

What I wanted to point out: it's not a Euro weakness but obviously Baht rising against (all) others.

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, KhunBENQ said:

Something is suspicious.

EUR/THB nosediving while EUR/USD is not that bad.

 

Screenshot_20230105_083955_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20230105_084015_Chrome.jpg

Yes i noticed that I'm no expert but thought when dollars 1.14 to £ the baht was say 43 and the dollar today is 1.20 to £ the baht is at 40.???

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given that tourism (an export) is the economic mainstay these days, it makes good economic sense to keep the baht high. If they are buying baht then that's a smart move. Not one I like but understandable. Thailand does not need to stimulate tourism. The post covid appetite for tourism is doing the job.

Edited by ozimoron
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Given that tourism (an export) is the economic mainstay these days, it makes good economic sense to keep the baht high. If they are buying baht then that's a smart move. Not one I like but understandable. Thailand does not need to stimulate tourism. The post covid appetite for tourism is doing the job.

Does that mean Thailand can set their own baht rate's against other world currencies instead of the trading money market.? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kwasaki said:

Does that mean Thailand can set their own baht rate's against other world currencies instead of the trading money market.? 

If they were able to fix the rate then the rest of the market would be at the same rate as arbitrage would close any gap.

 

Instead the Bank of Thailand has a few methods to influence the strength of the Baht like interest rates and buying/selling using their foreign reserves.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, nigelforbes said:

Regardless, there is no evidence that BOT manipulates the Baht, most importantly it's not in their best interests to do so.

They admitted to doing so in a statement a couple of months ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, John Drake said:

They admitted to doing so in a statement a couple of months ago.

BOT admitted to intervention in the FOREX market, not to currency manipulation. When USD was rapidly strengthening and was at 38, they attempted to smooth out some of the peaks, I think some at BOT were having a 1997 moment! That was not currency manipulation in the sense that the US defines it, nor is it that in the classical sense. BOT saw the ever strengthening USD as a threat to exporter survival and attempted to defend the Baht, even though the same thing was happening to other EM and regional currencies. One can argue that, under IMF rules, it is the central banks responsibility to smooth out the peaks and troughs of currency volatility. That incident was more than peaks and troughs, it was quite unprecedented.

 

The US problem with Thailand and their currency strength is very different. Thailand maintains imports artificially low which nearly always generates a trade surplus and a surplus in the current account. Those two things, combined with an an aver increasing volume of foreign currency in the Foreign Currency Reserves, makes THB strengthen almost continuously. If Thailand were to loosen import restriction, the trade balance would become more realistic and THB would be more influenced by market forces.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nigelforbes said:

Using the term, currency manipulation to account for Baht strength is the lazy persons way of avoiding thinking about the issue and failing to understand the problem!

 

Roger Bootle, Chairman of Capital Economics. wrote a seriously good article in the Telegraph this morning about the UK's debt problems. The article is an excellent example of why Thailand's economy is stronger and why the Baht continues to strengthen. I can't link to it because it is behind a paywall, but you may be able to find it bye searching for "Foreign rivals have bought up Britain – now we are at their mercy".

 

In it he refers to the UK's National Debt which is 90% of GDP, this compares to Thailand's which is about 61%. He goes on to talk about the UK, prior to WWII, having a stock of overseas assets equal to 170% of GDP whereas today it is persistently negative. In 1997, that stock of assets was worth 20% of GDP, today it is -18%! Thailand's history is the opposite, prior to 1997 their stock of overseas assets was almost zero, today it is substantial, as the following graph from the World Bank demonstrates.  

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/FM.AST.NFRG.CN?locations=TH

 

The UK's net position is determined by the current account of the balance of payments. In the UK’s case, the UK has persistently run current account deficits which have undermined their net international asset position. The UK has only managed to hold their own by a combination of a tendency to invest in assets abroad with higher returns than their liabilities to foreigners, and the tendency of the pound to fall on the exchanges, thereby reducing the international value of our liabilities. Thailand on the other hand almost continuously operates a current account surplus (covid era notwithstanding) because the country's  overseas liabilities in foreign currency is less than 4% of GDP. As a consequence the Baht has a tendency to rise or strengthen.

 

 

"The fact that we (the UK) are a significant net debtor means that unless we are peculiarly clever in our overseas investments, or take extra risks, there will be a persistent net outflow of interest payments and dividends abroad. For any given level of national output, this reduces the amount of resources available for domestic use. Interest payments on gilts held by foreigners are just a component of this. And if our net international asset position worsens, it is the equivalent of negative net investment. This might not matter if investment in the domestic economy was strong. But investment in the UK economy is pathetically weak". Again, compare this situation with Thailand's cash flow overseas which are almost non-existent plus the endless stream of companies wanting to invest in the country via the BOI scheme.

 

In summary, low public debt, consistent current account surplus from exports/tourism, overseas investment and assets, and, retained earnings in the country, all strongly favor Baht strength. Unless things change substantially, which they haven't really since the turn of the century, the long term trend of THB continues upwards, as it has been more or less has been since 2000, and that of the Pound is downwards, as it has since WWII. 

 

https://tradingeconomics.com/thailand/currency

 

 

 

Thanks for the Novella.  But the thing is all of the factors you have detailed in your post will not cause the baht to swing 2-3% in a matter of hours...and that is exactly what had been happening.  Someone was buying huge amounts of the baht in a single purhcase.  Who else would that be other than the BOT?  There was also a tiny one paragraph article in one of the Thai rags a month or so ago where the BOT admitted that they had and will continue to buy the baht.  

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Adumbration said:

Thanks for the Novella.  But the thing is all of the factors you have detailed in your post will not cause the baht to swing 2-3% in a matter of hours...and that is exactly what had been happening.  Someone was buying huge amounts of the baht in a single purhcase.  Who else would that be other than the BOT?  There was also a tiny one paragraph article in one of the Thai rags a month or so ago where the BOT admitted that they had and will continue to buy the baht.  

I have no difficulty if you or anyone else either doesn't believe or don't want to believe and want to continue hiding behind the notion of manipulation. Personally, I'd feel pretty stupid if I walked around all day telling everyone the earth was flat but each to their own.. At least those who genuinely don't understand, have an alternate basis to explore.

 

As I've said repeatedly, BOT is obliged, under IMF rules, to intervene to smooth out peaks and valley's in the baht's vale. That is their job, to aid exporters and they will never say they don't do that. But currency manipulation and intervention under IMF rules are very different things. BOT was buying Baht when USD was at 38 and they acknowledge that was fool hardy but once again, that's their mission under IMF's Managed Float. 

 

A 2 or 3% change in value in intraday trading is not unusual, big sales happen, big purchases happen. As also said previously, a 5% swing at the start of the month when US SSc payments are issued sounds reasonable, not that the swing is permanent. Intraday values are typically very volatile, that's the nature and design of the FOREX, there's no story to be had on 2 or 3%, move along. Perhaps one thing that escapes most people is that because THB is such a small currency, it doesn't take much to move it one way or the other. In terms of size, THB is a boutique currency that represents less than 1% of the FOREX.

 

If you want to believe the real story is currency manipulation, my questions are, why and how? BOT's numbers are there for all to see, show me us where and how.

.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ChaiyaTH said:

Really makes no sense for THB to keep this strong, this game been going for years now too.

Why does it make no sense, is it because you don't understand or do you have reasons why? The facts are that Baht strength makes perfect sense to Markets, to FOREX players, to economists and to anyone else who understands the reasons why.

Edited by nigelforbes
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And yet another:

 

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/emerging-markets-thai-baht-7-073931053.html

 

"The Thai baht firmed on Wednesday on hopes of a tourism boost after the easing of COVID restrictions in China, while most other Asian currencies remained muted ahead of the release of U.S. Federal Reserve policy meeting minutes. The baht rose for the fourth session in a row, up 0.8% to its highest since May 31".

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...