Jump to content

Stormy Daniels: Trump invited to testify before grand jury


onthedarkside

Recommended Posts

image.png.78d56bec9ed6f216abc859d176643b57.png

 

New York prosecutors have invited ex-US president Donald Trump to testify to a grand jury over the Stormy Daniels case, his lawyer has confirmed.

 

The Manhattan district attorney has investigated Mr Trump for five years over alleged hush money payments made on his behalf to the ex-porn star.

 

Inviting him to a grand jury indicates he could face charges, experts say.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-64913814

 

image.png.42b24a2222bfb94de3ac924f9a942790.png

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Donald Trump Access Hollywood tape can be used in civil rape trial, judge rules

 

The tape of Donald Trump boasting about sexual aggression towards women that detonated late in the 2016 election campaign but did not prevent him from winning the presidency will be permitted at a forthcoming civil trial in New York.

 

A federal judge ruled on Friday that the columnist E Jean Carroll can use the 2005 remarks by Trump, caught on tape in conversation with an Access Hollywood TV show personality, in support of her lawsuit accusing Trump of raping her in a department store dressing room in the 1990s.

 

Carroll sued Trump for defamation after he denied the rape ever happened or that he even knew the former longtime Elle magazine columnist, after she first described in a 2019 book her encounter with Trump in late 1995 or early 1996.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/mar/10/trump-access-hollywood-tape-evidence-jean-carroll-trial

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Classic rant from Trump on the Stormy Daniels case...........

 

Surprise: Trump’s response to Manhattan grand jury news is a mess

 

The former president and potential future criminal defendant seems nervous. He should be.

 

Donald Trump has issued more than one desperate statement over the years. The latest doesn’t disappoint.

 

It comes after Trump reportedly was invited to testify to a New York grand jury ahead of his potential indictment in the hush money investigation:

 

https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/trump-grand-jury-indictment-response-rcna74346

 

 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt he will turn up as it isn't mandatory. No judge is present; the proceedings are led by a prosecutor and the defendant has no right to present his case or (in many instances) to be informed of the proceedings at all.

The only other country that still uses the grand jury system is Liberia. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Your honor, I like nasty looking hussies. Can't help myself. And I usually pay for it, even though I am wealthy. Most women just find me too strange looking, to do it for free. 

It's my Orange color that puts them off until the green changes hands, your honor...

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Purdey said:

I doubt he will turn up as it isn't mandatory. No judge is present; the proceedings are led by a prosecutor and the defendant has no right to present his case or (in many instances) to be informed of the proceedings at all.

The only other country that still uses the grand jury system is Liberia. 

If you don’t like Grand Juries, change the Constitution.

 

Oh and while you’re at it……

 

 

Edited by Chomper Higgot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Purdey said:

I doubt he will turn up as it isn't mandatory. No judge is present; the proceedings are led by a prosecutor and the defendant has no right to present his case or (in many instances) to be informed of the proceedings at all.

The only other country that still uses the grand jury system is Liberia. 

The process allows the defendant to produce exculpatory evidence and to make an argument why he shouldn't be indicted. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Your honor, I like nasty looking hussies. Can't help myself. And I usually pay for it, even though I am wealthy. Most women just find me too strange looking, to do it for free. 

Didn't Stormy say "like a toadstool."  Could put some off.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said:

Your trying very hard to keep your hero from the slammer aren't you.

Don't be ridiculous, Trump will never go to prison, especially not for a misdemeanor.

I only bring context to the story presented and just to say that the time is running out to file a charge, some charge, ANYTHING against the MAGA leader. The feds saw no crimes worth perusing but the NYAG has spent an inordinate amount of time pushing the Stormy story, (hush money is not a crime)

but a campaign finance misdemeanor, lol. No slammer for Trumpie.

 If Trump's vulnerable to prosecution, what in God's name are they waiting for? (maybe some evidence, lol).

 

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/11/trump-federal-tax-prosecution-statute-of-limitations.html

 

"An attorney for Trump said Friday that any prosecution related to hush money payments to an adult film star would be “completely unprecedented” and accused the Manhattan district attorney of targeting the former president for “political reasons and personal animus.”

Trump attorney Joe Tacopina said in a statement shared with CNN that the campaign finance laws in this case, which is related to seven-year-old allegations, are “murky” and that the underlying legal theories of a possible case are “untested.”

“This DA and the former DA have been scouring every aspect of President Trump’s personal life and business affairs for years in search of a crime and needs to stop. This is simply not what our justice system is about,” Tacopina said."

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/03/10/politics/trump-manhattan-district-attorney-charges-explainer/index.html

 

 

Edited by dotcalm
  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ozimoron said:

The process allows the defendant to produce exculpatory evidence and to make an argument why he shouldn't be indicted. 

If you're referring to a witness's grand jury testimony, they are not "defendants", but only a witness. Only a person charged with a crime is referred to as the "defendant".

 

A GJ witness cannot produce their own self serving evidence unless asked, they have no 6th amendment protection (right to counsel) but have protections afforded by the 5th amendment only.

Edited by dotcalm
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These will be felony charges with the possibility of four years in prison but prison not required. But if convicted some prison is likely. These are not bail eligible offenses.

 

Explained here.

 

 

 

Edited by Jingthing
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...