https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-bristol-65637740?at_medium=social&at_link_origin=BBCBreaking&at_format=link&at_ptr_name=twitter&at_bbc_team=editorial&at_campaign=Social_Flow&at_link_type=web_link&at_link_id=0BCD4D10-F62A-11ED-A39E-9DC6D89D5CC3&at_campaign_type=owned

 

More sensationalist media b$#@cks.

 

A sensible headline would be "Offender jailed for sexusl abuse of child", just like any other story about abusers with not so famous siblings.

6 hours ago, youreavinalaff said:

More sensationalist media b$#@cks.

 

A sensible headline would be "Offender jailed for sexusl abuse of child", just like any other story about abusers with not so famous siblings.

Agree

6 hours ago, youreavinalaff said:

More sensationalist media b$#@cks.

 

A sensible headline would be "Offender jailed for sexusl abuse of child", just like any other story about abusers with not so famous siblings.

I agree 100%.

Initially I assumed that this was a typical Daily Mail piece. But no, I'm sorry to say that it's a BBC article.

How standards have fallen!

Seems the ‘famous’ one is ‘having kittens’ himself now…

Met the kid at 15…

It doesn’t look good for him. 

6 hours ago, NextG said:

Seems the ‘famous’ one is ‘having kittens’ himself now…

Met the kid at 15…

It doesn’t look good for him. 

Looks fine. It's once again just media making mountains out of mole hills.

 

It's been proven the relationship was legal. Not a great choice, as Phillip has said himself, but legal. 

 

Nothing to see here.

I would imagine that once this blows over the TV presenter will be given a peerage by the government for keeping the Sunak, Johnson, handbags at dawn feud, off the major news paper's front pages for 23 days.