Jump to content

Legal Experts Predict Dire Outcome For Donald Trump After Tape Report


onthedarkside

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Bkk Brian said:

It’s unclear whether (SC Smith's) prosecutors are prepared to seek an indictment at this point. The Justice Department would not comment on the status of the investigation.

As linked above.

 

This is Judge Kaplan's 24MAY2023 Court order:

 

ORDER:  Unless otherwise ordered, any opposition to plaintiff's (Carroll's) motion to amend, and any reply in support thereof, under the Rules of this Court, is due on or before June 5, 2023 and June 12, 2023, respectively. 

 

In other words, starts  TODAY US EDT time.

Edited by jerrymahoney
Link to comment
Share on other sites


5 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

As linked above.

 

This is Judge Kaplan's 24MAY2023 Court order:

 

ORDER:  Unless otherwise ordered, any opposition to plaintiff's (Carroll's) motion to amend, and any reply in support thereof, under the Rules of this Court, is due on or before June 5, 2023 and June 12, 2023, respectively. 

 

In other words, starts  TODAY US EDT time.

And what has any of this got to do with the criminal investigation of Trump in regards to Mar y Lago? Obsessed much?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, placeholder said:

And what has any of this got to do with the criminal investigation of Trump in regards to Mar y Lago? Obsessed much?

Nothing. One guy said on this topic that all these Trump follies should be FUN and I replied that the Carroll cases will be fun long before any of the 1 criminal indictment (case scheduled in 2024) and the other 2 possible cases where no indictments have yet to be issued.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

Nothing. One guy said on this topic that all these Trump follies should be FUN and I replied that the Carroll cases will be fun long before any of the 1 criminal indictment (case scheduled in 2024) and the other 2 possible cases where no indictments have yet to be issued.

And that first comment of yours, itself dubious, is where it should have stopped. There are other threads, still in existence, that address the Carroll cases.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, placeholder said:

And that first comment of yours, itself dubious, is where it should have stopped. There are other threads, still in existence, that address the Carroll cases.

Actually the other 2  reasonably current topics relate to Trumps 2022 jury  trial and the resulting appeal. This is the Carroll 2020 case filed when Trump was still president.

 

But I'll be more careful next time, Mr. Interlocutor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...
""