Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Both sides have good batsmen and bowlers, IMO the difference is fielding. The Poms are dropping more catches.

Posted
16 minutes ago, isaanistical said:

yeah, Starc is shocking. Took nearly one over just now to get rid of Stokes..

2 for 80 isnt great. Poor shot.

  • Haha 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

Please explain the above!

I read a post that does not explain what it is about!

The responses do no better.

I ask a simple question and get meaningless answers.

Is this some secret society gathering?

Pretty obvious the topic.

  • Confused 1
Posted

At 311 for 6 we could be in trouble ????

 

324 for 8 at 18.25 Thailand

325 for 9 at 18.27

 

And now 325 all out - 91 runs behind.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, bignok said:

Pretty obvious the topic.

Not to me until the person above @Liquorice explained it all so succinctly!

You may notice, if you bother to read the OP and replies, that the word "cricket" was never mentioned until then!

Well that is all over now and I have had a good innings and so I am now OUT and going for my tea!

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
4 hours ago, scottiejohn said:

Would someone care to explain what this subject/OP is about?

"Is England good enough?" 

At what? 

The responses to the OP tell me nothing! 

????

Hanging on in quiet desperation.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, scottiejohn said:

Would someone care to explain what this subject/OP is about?

"Is England good enough?" 

At what? 

The responses to the OP tell me nothing! 

????

There are clues in the OP, such as "test" , "bowling", and "Kevin Pieterson". The second post ( mine ) talks about batsmen, bowlers, fielding and dropped catches.

It's a bit like golf, with talk of drivers and wedges. Like the English, the Scots have rarely been much good at the game they invented. The current world # 1 is either Irish or Spanish.

 

Edited by Lacessit
Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, scottiejohn said:

Would someone care to explain what this subject/OP is about?

"Is England good enough?" 

At what? 

The responses to the OP tell me nothing! 

????

Croquet! Quick, hit the "confused" emoji! ????

 

 

Edited by 2baht
Posted
16 hours ago, Goat said:

After England choked up the first test in a comedy of errors, the way the second test is now looks like being a draw.

 

Are they good enough to win a game or is, as Kevin Pieterson says, the English bowling line up too slow and timid?

 

The only thing I see from stopping this being a 5-0 whitewash to the Aussies again is the miserable English weather. 

Since the release of the report on the institutionised way cricket behaves, I have stopped following it, I don't want to watch a bunch anti this anti that bigots running around a piece of grass, pretending it's a sport.

Posted

This clearly explains the game to all those that don't come from a Commonwealth country.

 

 

Posted
35 minutes ago, Grumpy one said:

Watching paint dry and cricket are neck and neck in the boring race, followed closely with watching grass grow  :omfg:

Bazball is fun to watch

  • Confused 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...