Jump to content

House Speaker asked to not permit re-nomination of Pita for PM


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

ruengkrai.jpg

 

A political activist asked the House speaker on Monday not to allow the re-nomination of Pita Limjaroenrat for the premiership on Wednesday.

 

Political activist Ruangkrai Leekitwattana said, if Pita is re-nominated, it may violate the Constitution and parliamentary regulations, as it could be tantamount to submitting a repeat motion in a single parliamentary session.

 

Pita’s first attempt to become the next prime minister of Thailand failed on July 13, when he did not gain enough parliamentary votes.In a joint sitting of 500 MPs and 250 senators, Pita received just 324 of the 375 votes required. Of the lawmakers present, 182 voted against him and 199 abstained.

 

Caption: Ruangkrai Leekitwattana

 

Full Story: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/house-speaker-asked-to-not-permit-re-nomination-of-pita-for-pm/

 

Logo-top-.png

-- © Copyright Thai PBS 2023-07-17
 

- Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here.

  • Sad 2
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, ikke1959 said:

rally and block his house is a better solution

Go to his housed and surround it?  And then take him to court?  Having just broken the law in surrounding his house and blocking it?  A touch hypocritical.

 

25 minutes ago, ikke1959 said:

and get him in court for obstruction of democracy and treason

How would you prove either of those things?

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they should call the military appointed senators bluff here and nominate a military backed candidate to see if the military appointed senators can be bothered to vote. If they get up to vote for the military candidate (and lose) then we will know 100% that they are just waiting for a military candidate and blocking democracy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Brickleberry said:

Hang on a minute.... this chap is a member of the Palang Pracharath Party... get it right PBS <deleted>! 

you can be activist and party member....

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a law is being broken, bringing it to public attention is right - Peta seems not to have a party legal advisor and people are willing to let him get away with things.

On the OTHER hand if the activist is wrong he can be sued for defamation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SoilSpoil said:

Yes, you can be an activist with a strong political bias. Morally wrong, but indeed possible.

I don't see it morally wrong...he find something that he thinks brake the law and reports it....Morally OK. If it makes sense and if he has too much time is another question

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mavideol said:

who the heck is this punk to keep asking questions and challenging people's choice, he really must hate the MF guy, bad blood run through  his body

He's part of Prawit's party.

 

That should answer your questions

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...