Jump to content

Antarctica is missing an Argentina-sized amount of sea ice – and scientists are scrambling to figure out why


Social Media

Recommended Posts

image.png

 

 

As the Northern Hemisphere swelters under a record-breaking summer heat wave, much further south, in the depths of winter, another terrifying climate record is being broken. Antarctic sea ice has fallen to unprecedented lows for this time of year.

Every year, Antarctic sea ice shrinks to its lowest levels towards the end of February, during the continent’s summer. The sea ice then builds back up over the winter.

But this year scientists have observed something different.

 

The sea ice has not returned to anywhere near expected levels. In fact it is at the lowest levels for this time of year since records began 45 years ago. The ice is around 1.6 million square kilometers (0.6 million square miles) below the previous winter record low set in 2022, according to data from the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC).

In mid-July, Antarctica’s sea ice was 2.6 million square kilometers (1 million square miles) below the 1981 to 2010 average. That is an area nearly as large as Argentina or the combined areas of Texas, California, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Utah, and Colorado

 

FULL STORY

image.jpeg.8cc4dd66bc37851fb61c912d6651869d.jpeg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, digger70 said:

The rate of change don't matter it Will change  why so pessimistic .

Because all the human beings I know of, don't live thousands of years. And the rate of change may not matter to you, but it is scientifically significant. I couldn't care less about your feelings in respect to a scientific issue.

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meanwhile just to add a bit of balance, here in sunny Surin daytime  temperatures are at or slightly lower than the 30 year average and that's according to msn's own "woke" weather "facts"     

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There have been 5 major ice ages in Earth's history.

 

The current one (yes, we are currently in an ice age) started around 3 million years ago. Each and every one has interglacial periods. 

 

Guess what, we're in the interglacial period of an ice age, the same as every one before it, and ever one that will be after it. Wow! ????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, placeholder said:

But even if it does happen, you, like so many other denialists, don't seem to understand the issue of rate of change.

Nothing I can do about it, so why should I care?

Nothing you can do about it, so why do you hate us 'deniers' for not caring.

 

Or it it the 'hate' you're really wanting?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

Meanwhile just to add a bit of balance, here in sunny Surin daytime  temperatures are at or slightly lower than the 30 year average and that's according to msn's own "woke" weather "facts"     

someone else who doesn't understand the difference between climate and weather

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Nothing I can do about it, so why should I care?

Nothing you can do about it, so why do you hate us 'deniers' for not caring.

 

Or it it the 'hate' you're really wanting?

Don't flatter yourself. I could care less about you. But this is the World News Forum. And when you claim false things, you're going to get called to account.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, JeffersLos said:

There have been 5 major ice ages in Earth's history.

 

The current one (yes, we are currently in an ice age) started around 3 million years ago. Each and every one has interglacial periods. 

 

Guess what, we're in the interglacial period of an ice age, the same as every one before it, and ever one that will be after it. Wow! ????

It's not at all a sure tihng that one will follow. It's not at all sure a re-glaciation will occur or that it won't be delayed.  It may even come sooner. Lots of variables come into play with anthropogenic global heating.

Edited by placeholder
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, digger70 said:

The rate of change don't matter it Will change  why so pessimistic .

The rate of change doesn't matter?  Do you realize the rate of change is the difference between a controlled stop and a fatal collision? Do you realize that ecosystems can evolve, adapt and even relocate given slow changes in the environment but will get wiped out with a fast change?

 

You are just posting uninformed nonsense on this topic.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

You're right, but you're wasting your time.

 

The Doomsday cult has made up it's mind. The earth's constantly changing climate over millions of years has nothing to do with it. It's all due to Somchai in his diesel pickup truck. Now, live your life as they tell you (no more holidays for you, private jets for them) and hand over your money (because as long as you pay to pollute it's all OK). 

 

This is about control and money, nothing else.

Another dishonest post. No climatologist to my knowledge has ever denied that climate changes over time. The issue is rate of change and what is contributing to that rate of change.

The rest of your post is just another evidence-free conspiracy theory.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Guitar God said:

That was a great example of the importance of taking the advice of experts. They discovered a problem, identified the cause, proposed a solution, we implemented it and a few decades later we were able to reverse the anthropogenic damage to the ozone layer. 
 

It should be required reading for the anthropogenic climate change deniers.  

What's truly bizarre is the existence of memes claiming that the CFC caused problem was some kind of fake.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, heybruce said:

The rate of change doesn't matter?  Do you realize the rate of change is the difference between a controlled stop and a fatal collision? Do you realize that ecosystems can evolve, adapt and even relocate given slow changes in the environment but will get wiped out with a fast change?

 

You are just posting uninformed nonsense on this topic.

Uninformed hey ? what nonsense are you preaching? The planet has been taking care off it self for many Thousands off years ,Fast or slow it doesn't matter you can't proof one way or the other . Let it Be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, digger70 said:

Uninformed hey ? what nonsense are you preaching? The planet has been taking care off it self for many Thousands off years ,Fast or slow it doesn't matter you can't proof one way or the other . Let it Be. 

If you calculate the change of atmospheric carbon dioxide and temperature over the past 200 years it blows any natural cycle or phenomenon out of the water. Probably by a factor of millions in rate of change.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.






×
×
  • Create New...