Jump to content

Are people better now or back in the 1980s


bignok

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, mrwebb8825 said:

During and after World War II, ships in the CV series were frequently given modified designations, including CVA (attack aircraft carrier), CVAN (nuclear-powered attack aircraft carrier)

Ships built after 1975 were all nuclear. Mine was CVA-61.

In Mid-December 1992, Ranger was relieved by Kitty Hawk and began her last journey home to San Diego. Ranger and her numerous air wings earned 13 battle stars for service in the Vietnam War. She was decommissioned on July 10, 1993, and is currently at the Naval Inactive Ship Maintenance Facility, Bremerton, Washington.

And what has that got do do with you saying "was cruising the world on the last atomic powered aircraft carrier and getting paid for my travels."?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/4/2023 at 3:06 PM, Bangel72 said:

, just look around and fairly sure that within 10 mins you'll spot some oddity that is a bit off, unless of course your the off one.

 

Didn't notice it as much back then.

To summarize.... Odd people don't notice odd people.

 

You didn't notice odd people back then?

 

Hmm... ????????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/3/2023 at 11:15 PM, mrwebb8825 said:

During and after World War II, ships in the CV series were frequently given modified designations, including CVA (attack aircraft carrier), CVAN (nuclear-powered attack aircraft carrier)

Ships built after 1975 were all nuclear. Mine was CVA-61.

In Mid-December 1992, Ranger was relieved by Kitty Hawk and began her last journey home to San Diego. Ranger and her numerous air wings earned 13 battle stars for service in the Vietnam War. She was decommissioned on July 10, 1993, and is currently at the Naval Inactive Ship Maintenance Facility, Bremerton, Washington.

 

Beyond that, I couldn't really shive a git what makes sense to you. Good day.

Did you miss a non then, as in I was cruising the world on the last non atomic powered aircraft carrier?

Google tells me that the USS Ranger was non nuclear powered.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

IMO, the question is are people of better character now than they used to be, not are they better off.

There’s only one f in of, and if people don’t understand that, they’re as well effin’ off.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, StreetCowboy said:

I’m terms of literacy, you may be an example of decline.  
“better off” and “better” are not synonymous.

You knew he meant, "I am a person".

Or, maybe he actually meant, "I am a sheeple".

Or, he might have meant, "We the People".

Or, he could have meant, "We, the several peoples of the UK".

Maybe we are better off not knowing his meanings.

I am better after having written this.

Nobody is better having read this.

My written English and grammar usage is atrocious.

I know that I am unable to better myself by improving my written grammar.

I am only an American.

if I had wished to better myself when I was young, and while there was still time, then I would have moved to Ireland or Scotland.

I really think I should have.

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...