phetpeter Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 After 20 minutes in a pool, I would start to feel numb, a 5-second shock, hey, them Doctors are really clever, down to the second? So, 20 minutes in the pool on a very hot day, a 5-second electric shock from what? Yep! Take the offer, 'cause if you carry on with that lawyer, you bet the hotel will come up with a better defence and you will lose. As someone has stated this is not America and Thai's don't like to give up their money as quickly as US companies do. 1 1
phetpeter Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 13 minutes ago, Sig said: "minor incident"? Do you have any idea what electrical shocks like this can do to you? It could damage internal organs and cause brain damage, which of course can lead to all sorts of other complications. I don't quite get how people on here can laugh this off like it's nothing. And depending only on some little news article to form such opinions over something that could have lifelong consequences for these people, including a small child for God's sake, is mindboggling. There's a thing called empathy that seems to be severely lacking around here, not to mention the ability to grasp the potential seriousness of a variety of things.... smh How to make money 101 US education 1 1
richard_smith237 Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 4 minutes ago, phetpeter said: How to make money 101 US education So you don't think someone receiving an electric shock in a hotel Jacuzzi is a problem, you instead find issue with the victims ???? There are some rather inside-out and upside-down opinions on this forum, almost as if some have gone so native they blame innocent victims for incompetence and negligence of others. 1 1
PETERTHEEATER Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 2 hours ago, bbko said: As a fellow American, all I can do is shake my head and think, sheez, get over yourselves, this isn't the USA. Man up, if there isn't any obvious injuries, take the 100k and get on with your life. The way I read it is that, the hotel will pay up to 100k against receipts. If the claimants were billed and receipted lower than that, it's all they will get. I hope their lawyer is working pro bono.???? 1
bbko Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 15 minutes ago, Sig said: Do you have any idea what electrical shocks like this can do to you? Actually, yes. I was standing in ankle deep water during a Thai thunderstorm and having lighting strike a few hundred meters away, I felt the instant shock, the numbness in the legs for the next hour. That was 10 years ago, zero side effects. We don't know the voltage or amperage they were exposed to, but it sounds minimal as they were able to sit in the water for some time. 1
TimeMachine Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 Isn't there a public liability insurance scheme in Thailand paid within taxes by Thai companies? I know they have the cars on the road one.
Sig Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 5 minutes ago, PJ71 said: Are you from the U S of A? That is irrelevant to my opinion re my point on compensation. But if you must know, to suit whatever presupposition you may be holding, my parents are not American and I grew up in a few different countries. Depending on how you define where one is "from"... I also did spend some years in America. I know absolutely that the kind of compensation I was mentioning would be offered in at the least 3 or 4 countries that I've lived and worked in. I know that the idea of compensation for mental/psychological pain/suffering is well established in both UK and Japanese law. And I would assume that if it is in two quite different cultures and juridical systems like that, it is likely common in many if not most countries. It is not anything that somehow Americans hold some sort of exclusive idea about. Not by any stretch. Now, as for Thailand.... I don't know as much in terms of law. But I do know that different Thai friends of mine who own businesses would certainly step up and try to do whatever they could to compensate the family to make them feel like they were cared about more than just paying for hospital bills. It is so absurd, it's unfathomable. 1
PJ71 Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 8 minutes ago, Sig said: That is irrelevant to my opinion re my point on compensation. But if you must know, to suit whatever presupposition you may be holding, my parents are not American and I grew up in a few different countries. Depending on how you define where one is "from"... I also did spend some years in America. I know absolutely that the kind of compensation I was mentioning would be offered in at the least 3 or 4 countries that I've lived and worked in. I know that the idea of compensation for mental/psychological pain/suffering is well established in both UK and Japanese law. And I would assume that if it is in two quite different cultures and juridical systems like that, it is likely common in many if not most countries. It is not anything that somehow Americans hold some sort of exclusive idea about. Not by any stretch. Now, as for Thailand.... I don't know as much in terms of law. But I do know that different Thai friends of mine who own businesses would certainly step up and try to do whatever they could to compensate the family to make them feel like they were cared about more than just paying for hospital bills. It is so absurd, it's unfathomable. hahahahahahahhahahahahahaha 1
Sig Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 8 minutes ago, bbko said: Actually, yes. I was standing in ankle deep water during a Thai thunderstorm and having lighting strike a few hundred meters away, I felt the instant shock, the numbness in the legs for the next hour. That was 10 years ago, zero side effects. We don't know the voltage or amperage they were exposed to, but it sounds minimal as they were able to sit in the water for some time. Although I can understand why you may want to equate your experience in some way or another to the point at hand, basing an opinion on personal anecdotal experience isn't the wisest way to form an opinion from which to judge other people's disasters against. Organ damage or brain damage may not be readily known and the unborn child may also be affected. As you mentioned, we don't know the voltage or amperage. We also don't know how long they were shocked for. They don't know either. They have their ideas, but it is not knowable (unless there is something that wasn't reported) if it happened during the last few seconds before they were able to get out or if it was a low level long term exposure. There are so many unknowns, it is ridiculous for people to make their judgments toward this family with such callousness. Electrical shocks also do not affect every person in the same way. You can shock different people in the exact same way and have completely different outcomes - from death to near no effect. The crude mental toxicity on this forum is insane (that isn't directed toward you. I'm just stunned by the level of lunacy in here.). 1 1
Sig Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 5 minutes ago, PJ71 said: hahahahahahahhahahahahahaha That mean you don't know how to read? 1
KannikaP Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 4 hours ago, roo860 said: Could have been damaged before? What, on all three of them. 1
RocketDog Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 9 hours ago, Artisi said: Of course, have the authorities investigated why /what the cause was and had it rectified - no, why worry nobody died. I doubt it was rectified, probably just normal 220V/50Hz AC. ???? (Sorry, an inside joke. @Crossy will get it) 1
RocketDog Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 11 minutes ago, Sig said: The crude mental toxicity on this forum is insane (that isn't directed toward you. I'm just stunned by the level of lunacy in here.). ???? 1
PJ71 Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 17 minutes ago, Sig said: That mean you don't know how to read? no, it means i read what you wrote and find it very funny. That mean you don't know how to understand? 2
PJ71 Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 19 minutes ago, Sig said: Although I can understand why you may want to equate your experience in some way or another to the point at hand, basing an opinion on personal anecdotal experience isn't the wisest way to form an opinion from which to judge other people's disasters against. Organ damage or brain damage may not be readily known and the unborn child may also be affected. As you mentioned, we don't know the voltage or amperage. We also don't know how long they were shocked for. They don't know either. They have their ideas, but it is not knowable (unless there is something that wasn't reported) if it happened during the last few seconds before they were able to get out or if it was a low level long term exposure. There are so many unknowns, it is ridiculous for people to make their judgments toward this family with such callousness. Electrical shocks also do not affect every person in the same way. You can shock different people in the exact same way and have completely different outcomes - from death to near no effect. The crude mental toxicity on this forum is insane (that isn't directed toward you. I'm just stunned by the level of lunacy in here.). more humour - love it. 1
transam Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 33 minutes ago, Sig said: That is irrelevant to my opinion re my point on compensation. But if you must know, to suit whatever presupposition you may be holding, my parents are not American and I grew up in a few different countries. Depending on how you define where one is "from"... I also did spend some years in America. I know absolutely that the kind of compensation I was mentioning would be offered in at the least 3 or 4 countries that I've lived and worked in. I know that the idea of compensation for mental/psychological pain/suffering is well established in both UK and Japanese law. And I would assume that if it is in two quite different cultures and juridical systems like that, it is likely common in many if not most countries. It is not anything that somehow Americans hold some sort of exclusive idea about. Not by any stretch. Now, as for Thailand.... I don't know as much in terms of law. But I do know that different Thai friends of mine who own businesses would certainly step up and try to do whatever they could to compensate the family to make them feel like they were cared about more than just paying for hospital bills. It is so absurd, it's unfathomable. Do you know what paragraphs are..............? ???? 1
Popular Post keithkarmann Posted September 16, 2023 Popular Post Posted September 16, 2023 7 hours ago, transam said: Oh, a hi-so member...........???? Anything over 500 baht a night is luxury to me. 1 1 1
Smokey and the Bandit Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 3 hours ago, bbko said: As a fellow American, all I can do is shake my head and think, sheez, get over yourselves, this isn't the USA. Man up, if there isn't any obvious injuries, take the 100k and get on with your life. The hotel was not going to actually give them 100k, they offered to pay for medical costs up to 100k, providing the couple could give receipts! 1
TimeMachine Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 43 minutes ago, RocketDog said: I doubt it was rectified, probably just normal 220V/50Hz AC. ???? (Sorry, an inside joke. @Crossy will get it) You don't want it rectified. Harder shock. Haha. Cracks me up. 1
Sig Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 4 hours ago, Nickcage49 said: Lord help me. If they were "electrocuted" they wouldn't be here to talk about it. Get some English lessons guys. "English lessons"? Lesson for the 21st century - Electrocution/Electrocute:Oxford Reference: "The injury or killing of someone by electric shock"Collins: "If someone is electrocuted, they are accidentally killed or badly injured when they touch something connected to a source of electricity."Merriam-Webster: "to kill or severely injure by electric shock"Longman: "If someone is electrocuted, they are injured or killed by electricity passing through their body."StackExchange: "The term electrocute was originally coined in 1889 by splicing the prefix electro- into the word execute. It originally meant execute (by electric shock). However, its meaning has evolved over time: first to also include accidental death by electric shock and later to include electrical injury, generally serious in nature." 2 1
Sig Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 38 minutes ago, transam said: Do you know what paragraphs are..............? ???? This isn't an academic exercise. You are being intellectually dishonest, among other things.... 1
transam Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 Just now, Sig said: This isn't an academic exercise. You are being intellectually dishonest, among other things.... No I'm not, I have trouble reading it, so if I do, I expect others are too. Paragraphs are incredibly easy to achieve, if you know how....????
Gknrd Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 11 hours ago, Ben Zioner said: Hardly luxury at 3364 Baht per night. But that's no excuse for not giving proper compensation. Giving 100000 is an insult in this case. In Thailand , unless you are a tourist that is luxury Personally I would of taken the 100K 1
Sig Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 1 minute ago, transam said: No I'm not, I have trouble reading it, so if I do, I expect others are too. Paragraphs are incredibly easy to achieve, if you know how....???? If you have trouble reading it, just say so from the beginning or just walk on by. No need to be toxic and snarky, although that appears to be the penchant so so many on here....???? What kind of seriously inquiring person asks someone if they know what paragraphs are? Want to make constructive criticism in a true attempt to gain understanding or less difficulty in reading someone's writing? Then do so. No need for disparaging remarks if you really aren't being intellectually dishonest.
transam Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 Just now, Sig said: If you have trouble reading it, just say so from the beginning or just walk on by. No need to be toxic and snarky, although that appears to be the penchant so so many on here....???? What kind of seriously inquiring person asks someone if they know what paragraphs are? Want to make constructive criticism in a true attempt to gain understanding or less difficulty in reading someone's writing? Then do so. No need for disparaging remarks if you really aren't being intellectually dishonest. Thanks for the paragraphs, I can read that, sort of, well done...... 1
Muzzique Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 7 hours ago, simon43 said: I'm intrigued to know how the hospital was able to identify a 5 second electric shock It must be a new diagnostic skill I've never heard of.... unless he simply asked them 'how long did the shock last?' Sounds like a scam to me... Last day, in the pool for 20 minutes and only felt the effect at the end. Doctor 'what are your symptoms?' Mrs Thai 'I felt numb all over my body and found it hard to move my arms and legs' Doctor 'Obviously it's a 5 second electric shock' I would have diagnosed an orgasm...
Sig Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 2 hours ago, richard_smith237 said: Agreed... There have been numerous debates on this forum regarding the specific meaning of 'electrocution' in relation to meaning death, or death and serious injury. Thus: the use of electrocution in this example is perhaps excessive because it would appear there was no 'serious' injury. That said, its easy enough for any of us to know exactly what is meant by the word without delving in to the semantics... I'm sure our resident pedant will be along shortly to debate the debate !!!! Agreed - debating the meaning of the word isn't necessary, since it has a definition and established usage. And since we don't know the severity of injury, it's not worth debating whether or not using the word was excessive or not. IF the supposed words of the injured woman were taken at face value, it would appear appropriate. But, who knows.... We sure don't. Nothing there to take a stand to debate with one way or the other. On top of that, news stories seem to have a tendency to use sensationalistic headlines at any given opportunity, whether truly warranted or not.
Popular Post Sig Posted September 16, 2023 Popular Post Posted September 16, 2023 29 minutes ago, transam said: Thanks for the paragraphs, I can read that, sort of, well done...... Congrats on being consistent in your toxicity. 1 2
transam Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 Just now, Sig said: Congrats on being consistent in your toxicity. Oh, and there's me just trying to help "us" out, but never had a "toxicity" before, that's a new one...........????
radiochaser Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 4 hours ago, nchuckle said: Trauma,they now can't face visiting a Watt,nor a series of other parallel tourist attractions. They have a battery of other issues and now just want to go ohm.. Too many puns in one post Hertz! You should try alternating them in other posts.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now