UK: Met police request support from army after officers down firearms

[Chomper Higgot]

1 minute ago, JonnyF said:

I'm sure Chomhpherh would consider the criminal with convictions for weapon possession unarmed if he simply ran her over in his Audi Q8.

 

Weapon? What weapon? He used his car...

I see you’ve moved on to deliberate misspelling my username and inventing points of view for me. 
 

 

[JonnyF]

24 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’m not siding with any criminals.

 

The allegations and charges have not yet been proven in a court of law.

 

 

He already did 2 years for a previous crime on gun charges. 

 

He is a criminal. And you are siding with him. 

 

Again.

[JonnyF]

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I see you’ve moved on to deliberate misspelling my username and inventing points of view for me. 
 

 

Pot. Kettle.

[JonnyF]

Just now, transam said:

Yes, Mrs. Negative, searching for confrontation, an American Frauditor........????

Just trying to import American racial issues to the UK.

 

Popular amongst ultra priviliged American liberals like Markle and Winfrey.

[Chomper Higgot]

1 minute ago, JonnyF said:

He already did 2 years for a previous crime on gun charges. 

 

He is a criminal. And you are siding with him. 

 

Again.

I’m not siding with him at all.

 

He’s not a criminal he’s dead.

 

He was a criminal and he served his time for those crimes.

 

A little reminder of that innocent until proven guilty argument you so often make.

[Chomper Higgot]

1 minute ago, JonnyF said:

Just trying to import American racial issues to the UK.

 

Popular amongst ultra priviliged American liberals like Markle and Winfrey.

If might remind you.

 

It was you who introduced George Floyd into the discussion.

 

Pot, kettle and all that.

[JonnyF]

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

I’m not siding with him at all.

 

He’s not a criminal he’s dead.

 

He was a criminal and he served his time for those crimes.

 

A little reminder of that innocent until proven guilty argument you so often make.

He was innocent until proven guilty on gun possession charges.

 

You liberals pick some strange martyrs. Floyd is another criminal held up as some kind of hero. Leave your divisive race baiting in the US.

[Chomper Higgot]

Let’s try again:

 

9 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

So here’s a question.

 

Should armed police officers be subject to the law?

 

[Chomper Higgot]

1 minute ago, JonnyF said:

He was innocent until proven guilty on gun possession charges.

 

You liberals pick some strange martyrs. Floyd is another criminal held up as some kind of hero. Leave your divisive race baiting in the US.

Johnny, it was you that introduced George Floyd into this discussion.

 

 

 

[JonnyF]

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

Johnny, it was you that introduced George Floyd into this discussion.

 

 

 

Deliberately misspelling my name again? Pot. Kettle.

 

Yes the defending of the convicted criminal Floyd and the defending of the convicted criminal in this case is a similarity I cannot ignore. Both suit your race baiting anti police far left agenda.

[Chomper Higgot]

17 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Deliberately misspelling my name again? Pot. Kettle.

 

Yes the defending of the convicted criminal Floyd and the defending of the convicted criminal in this case is a similarity I cannot ignore. Both suit your race baiting anti police far left agenda.

Jonny,

 

the term ‘Race bating’ appears three times, you introduced it and then repeated the accusation twice more.

 

Nobody was talking about race or race baiting, until you got started in it.

 

[Chomper Higgot]

So, should armed police officers be above the law?

 

[Rimmer]

Posts and replies contravening our Community Standards have been removed.    

[nauseus]

9 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

So, should armed police officers be above the law?

 

I will answer with a no. 

 

But these repeated Qs are rather Dandemanesqueish.

[Chomper Higgot]

48 minutes ago, nauseus said:

I will answer with a no. 

 

But these repeated Qs are rather Dandemanesqueish.

I agree, police officers, armed or otherwise should not be above the law.

 

When that’s accepted it remains for a court trial and a jury to decide guilt or innocence, as with other criminal charges laid against anyone else.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[transam]

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’m not siding with him at all.

 

He’s not a criminal he’s dead.

 

He was a criminal and he served his time for those crimes.

 

A little reminder of that innocent until proven guilty argument you so often make.

1. You are siding with a crook.

2. He is a dead criminal.

3. Serving time does not remove possible future criminality or turn them into an angel.

4. We don't need reminding of the obvious.

[thaibeachlovers]

2 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Lazy. You know what he did. It's a very irritating tactic. I'd go as far as to call it trolling.

It's baiting. He used to do that to me till I put him on ignore. He might still be doing so, but it's great not seeing it.

[Chomper Higgot]

1 minute ago, transam said:

1. You are siding with a crook.

2. He is a dead criminal.

3. Serving time does not remove possible future criminality or turn them into an angel.

4. We don't need reminding of the obvious.

1. No I am not.

2. Yes he is.

3. Likewise it doesn’t remove an individual’s right to life.

4. Erm…

[Chomper Higgot]

10 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

It's baiting. He used to do that to me till I put him on ignore. He might still be doing so, but it's great not seeing it.

I’m not the topic of conversation.

[Nick Carter icp]

3 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Lazy

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/09/06/police-shoot-dead-man-lambeth/

 

Ramming a police road block set up to apprehend him on gun charges.

Not quite .

The car was linked to a gun incident the previous day and the car didn't belong to him 

[Nick Carter icp]

28 minutes ago, transam said:

1. You are siding with a crook.

2. He is a dead criminal.

3. Serving time does not remove possible future criminality or turn them into an angel.

4. We don't need reminding of the obvious.

Do you think that the Police should have the legal right to shoot people in the head and instantly kill them for driving offences (and the suspicion that they were involved in gun crimes) ?

Edited September 25, 2023 by Nick Carter icp

[roo860]

32 minutes ago, transam said:

1. You are siding with a crook.

2. He is a dead criminal.

3. Serving time does not remove possible future criminality or turn them into an angel.

4. We don't need reminding of the obvious.

Mr Kaba had previously served a four year prison sentence after being convicted of possessing an imitation firearm.

But it has now emerged that in August 2020, after he had got out of jail, he was caught driving without insurance with a knife in his car.

Because the offences were committed while he was still on licence, he received an extra five months in custody.

Court records also show that in April this year, Mr Kaba was served with a 28-day domestic violence protection order relating to the mother of his unborn child barring him from contacting her on social media or entering the street where she lives.

 

 

according to family and friends he was a shining light, and looking forward to being a father . Would saved alot of bother if he'd just got out of the car as instructed by officers, instead tried to ram his way out.

Edited September 25, 2023 by roo860

[Nick Carter icp]

2 hours ago, transam said:

Making excuses for people the police are trying to protect you from.

 

You are not a troll, you are weird...........

I don't need protecting from Black people , I need protecting from old bill with shooters 

[Nick Carter icp]

12 minutes ago, roo860 said:

Mr Kaba had previously served a

^Deleted because of large font :Yes,  he should have gotton out his car and he shouldn't have rammed the police car .

   But should the police have killed him for doing that ?

His actions were wrong .

But the Polices actions are what is being questioned 

[JonnyF]

22 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Not quite .

The car was linked to a gun incident the previous day and the car didn't belong to him 

The police were not aware of that at the time. 

 

They had a driver who had previously been convicted of gun crimes, ramming them in a car that was linked to a gun incident the previous day.

 

Why are you siding with the criminal ramming the police? Are you one of those Antifa defund the police types?  (serious question not trolling).

[transam]

10 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

I don't need protecting from Black people , I need protecting from old bill with shooters 

I think you need protecting from yourself...............

[Nick Carter icp]

1 minute ago, JonnyF said:

The police were not aware of that at the time. 

 

They had a driver who had previously been convicted of gun crimes, ramming them in a car that was linked to a gun incident the previous day.

 

Why are you siding with the criminal ramming the police? Are you one of those Antifa defund the police types?  (serious question not trolling).

Nope, I am a right wing pro Trump , pro Brexit , Kyle Rittenhouse supporter and have no sympathies for George Floyd .

   Now I have got that out the way  , I don't think that the U.K police should have the legal right to assassinate people .

   If it is shown that he had a gun and was threatening the police , then I will change my mind and then agree with the polices actions 

[JonnyF]

6 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

^Deleted because of large font :Yes,  he should have gotton out his car and he shouldn't have rammed the police car .

   But should the police have killed him for doing that ?

His actions were wrong .

But the Polices actions are what is being questioned 

What would you recommend? Give him a warm glass of milk and a copy of one of Robin DiAngelo's novels?

 

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. He'd had already done 2 years for gun offenses. Now he is ramming a police roadblock in a car being stopped for gun crime the previous day. 

 

I would have preferred the shots were non fatal but when you take risks like that you take tour chances. He lost this time. Unfortunate. Next...

 

 

[JonnyF]

3 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Nope, I am a right wing pro Trump , pro Brexit , Kyle Rittenhouse supporter and have no sympathies for George Floyd .

   Now I have got that out the way  , I don't think that the U.K police should have the legal right to assassinate people .

   If it is shown that he had a gun and was threatening the police , then I will change my mind and then agree with the polices actions 

Guns are not the only dangerous weapons. You ban guns, people use cars and vans like London bridge in 2017.

 

Just be glad you weren't walking your child down the road while he was ramming the police roadblock in his Audi Q8. You might have had less sympathy for him. 

 

Same as you might have had less sympathy for Floyd if you were one of his many victims of cowardly crimes.

[Nick Carter icp]

5 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

What would you recommend? Give him a warm glass of milk and a copy of one of Robin DiAngelo's novels?

 

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. He'd had already done 2 years for gun offenses. Now he is ramming a police roadblock in a car being stopped for gun crime the previous day. 

 

I would have preferred the shots were non fatal but when you take risks like that you take tour chances. He lost this time. Unfortunate. Next...

 

 

There would have been other options available , other than a warm glass of milk or a bullet in the head .

   (If the car had been involved in a gun crime the previous day, they should have shot the car ????