Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

So your not going to answer Paul just like your little gang now go away. We are debating the War started by Hamas on 7th Oct.

I will respond by saying, the War was started post "biblical era" formulated by Zionism, and subsequently acquiesced to  by the ruling "World Powers".

This latest chapter on 7th October stemming from atrocities committed by Hammas, did not stem from a vacuum.

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 3
Posted
1 minute ago, Paul Catton said:

I will respond by saying, the War was started post "biblical era" formulated by Zionism, and subsequently acquiesced to  by the ruling "World Powers".

This latest chapter on 7th October stemming from atrocities committed by Hammas, did not stem from a vacuum.

 

What did it stem from Paul Catton?

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

What did it stem from Paul Catton?

 

Refer back to the  "United Nation Secretary General" relating back to the  more recent historical disregard by the State of Israel regarding atrocities being committed.

 

Posted

The apologists on this forum do:

 

WASHINGTON, Oct 25 (Reuters) - U.S. President Joe Biden said on Wednesday he has "no confidence in the number that the Palestinians are using" for the death toll in the Hamas-run Gaza Strip, where the health ministry says over 6,500 have been killed in Israeli attacks.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/biden-says-he-has-no-confidence-palestinian-death-count-2023-10-26

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Paul Catton said:

Refer back to the  "United Nation Secretary General" relating back to the  more recent historical disregard by the State of Israel regarding atrocities being committed.

 

Did you get his update where he walked back his statement re "vacuum"

Edited by Bkk Brian
Posted
42 minutes ago, Paul Catton said:

Refer back to the  "United Nation Secretary General" relating back to the  more recent historical disregard by the State of Israel regarding atrocities being committed.

 

So are you telling us the 7th of Oct meant nothing to you your a troll.

  • Like 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, Paul Catton said:

Dis-information again, I did not.

Apologies to you BKK Brian, Without thought, emotive replies are sent in response to critique.  UNSG further clarified his position condemning both.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
42 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Interesting update today from IDF, its just a few hours old and in it he talks about the fuel situation in Gaza, who has it and how much is left, where it is and also talks about the figures given for deaths/injuries by the Hamas run Gaza Health Authority. Including the figures given for the hospital carpark incident which were extremely exaggerated. 

 

Yesterday Hamas also attempted to gain entry to another community within Israel no doubt for another murder spree but were intercepted.

Wating your time on these Id  ts they wont debate just winding us up ignore them now.

 

 

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

So are you telling us the 7th of Oct meant nothing to you your a troll.

Asking a question like that is trolling.

Any "atrocity" committed against humankind leaves a scar whether being a participant or not.  

Edited by Paul Catton
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Morch said:

 

Yawn. Israel Bad, Bad, Bad....

Again with that Palestinians have nothing to do with anything approach?

Yes Israel is bad, bad, bad.

 

As for the Palestinians...., if a woman in a short skirt gets raped, is it her fault or the rapists? If she hits the rapist back, does that then justify the rape and future rapes?

  • Confused 3
  • Sad 2
Posted
48 minutes ago, MrMojoRisin said:

Yes Israel is bad, bad, bad.

 

As for the Palestinians...., if a woman in a short skirt gets raped, is it her fault or the rapists? If she hits the rapist back, does that then justify the rape and future rapes?

 

Oh, you're doing the bogus analogy thing, again? How interesting.

Basically, what you're on about is that the Palestinians are eternal victims, clueless children, bumbling about in search of freedom and so on.

I'm not sure Palestinians (at least the ones I know) would take kindly to such descriptions, never mind implying they are women.

Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, transam said:

if a woman in a short skirt gets raped, is it her fault or the rapists?

 

apologies, did not intend to reply to you 

Edited by Eloquent pilgrim
  • Like 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, transam said:

You are most definitely a racist, and your "if's" are stupid.......🥴

You  are an apologist for and of  mindless incomprehension  in intended meaning.  A sort of infertile version of "spelling and grammar Police".

Posted
3 minutes ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

 

A man that one assumes has received both an academic and societal education from a modern western democratic country  …….. asks this question; astonishing

Wasn't me..........🤭

Posted
3 minutes ago, RanongCat said:

You  are an apologist for and of  mindless incomprehension  in intended meaning.  A sort of infertile version of "spelling and grammar Police".

 

All of the dream, how does it mean?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...