Jump to content

ISRAEL IS AT WAR !


Social Media

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

The earliest possible to "bring back" that criminally corrupt insurrectionist con man is January 2025 unless you're like a typical trumpist that wants to burn the constitution (except for the 2nd amendment). 

I'm not a Trumpist. Not all are polarised. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

These 1948 refugees would have lived in Egyptian controlled Gaza for 20 years, and thereafter in the Egyptian culture of Gaza.

 

Not the same as the West Bank Palestinians.

This whole concept of 'Egyptian culture of Gaza' is a bit inflated. There differences are not all that great anyway. The 20 years claim would actually undermine your argument, considering both the West Bank and the Gaza Strip have been controlled by Israel for a longer period of time.

 

Regardless, in effect there is no such clear divide as you suggest, at least not in the political sense. Gazans may have a sense of local identity, but it's not like there's some general sentiment that they are a separate people. More like how people from different provinces may feel about things, perhaps.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What Is Not Antisemitic?

  1. As a general rule, criticism of Zionism and Israel, opposition to Israel’s policies, or nonviolent political action directed at the State of Israel and/or its policies should not, as such, be deemed antisemitic.
  2. Even contentious, strident, or harsh criticism of Israel for its policies and actions, including those that led to the creation of Israel, is not per se illegitimate or antisemitic.
  3. Opposition to Zionism and/or Israel does not necessarily reflect specific anti-Jewish animus nor purposefully lead to antisemitic behaviors and conditions. (For example, someone might oppose the principle of nationalism or ethnonationalist ideology. Similarly, someone’s personal or national experience may have been adversely affected by the creation of the State of Israel. These motivations or attitudes towards Israel and/or Zionism do not necessarily constitute antisemitic behavior.)
  4. Paying disproportionate attention to Israel and treating Israel differently than other countries is not prima facie proof of antisemitism. (There are numerous reasons for devoting special attention to Israel and treating Israel differently, e.g., some people care about Israel more; others may pay more attention because Israel has a special relationship with the United States and receives $4 billion in American aid).

 

 

https://israelandantisemitism.com/the-nexus-document/

Edited by Neeranam
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Yes I highly doubt it too. Especially since they are continuing to fire their rockets from residential area's in Gaza into Israel and using kids and civilians as their human shields. 

Do you really expect them not to fight back? Jeez. 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Yeah, that is very odd indeed. Also, there is a phrase that I only hear when anything to do with Israel is in the news.... is the Israeli response "proportionate"?   What does this mean exactly.  AFAIK, nobody asked the US to be careful after 9/11 and make sure to just have a "proportionate" military response.   Yet it seems that being asked for restraint after being attacked is a privilege only enjoyed by Israel.

Don't forget that Israeli soldiers should just throw stones at Palestinians , just to make the fight fairer

  • Love It 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Yeah, that is very odd indeed. Also, there is a phrase that I only hear when anything to do with Israel is in the news.... is the Israeli response "proportionate"?   What does this mean exactly.  AFAIK, nobody asked the US to be careful after 9/11 and make sure to just have a "proportionate" military response.   Yet it seems that being asked for restraint after being attacked is a privilege only enjoyed by Israel.

Pundits are properly mentioning that the US made big mistakes after 911 and that Israel should be careful to not copy that.

 

But alas Israel knows for certain who did the terrorism.

 

Also for Israel the terrorists are right on their ass like if the 911 terrorists had been in New Jersey. 

 

So bottom line not many lessons for Israel to learn from that as the situation is very different.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Neeranam said:

Amnesty International shares proof on Israel's use of white phosphorus in Gaza

Dropping this on innocent children is so bad. 

 

https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/amnesty-international-shares-proof-on-israels-use-of-white-phosphorus-in-gaza/3020340

Discussed and explained previously on this topic (or one of the parallel ones). Not illegal in all situation, dependent on actual used and circumstances.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Pundits are properly mentioning that the US made big mistakes after 911 and that Israel should be careful to not copy that.

 

But alas Israel knows for certain who did the terrorism.

 

Also for Israel the terrorists are right on their ass like if the 911 terrorists had been in New Jersey. 

 

So bottom line not many lessons for Israel to learn from that as the situation is very different.

 

 

One lesson (which I doubt would be learned) is not to go for populist freedom limiting legislation etc. - already some right wing initiatives in the works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...