Jump to content

Highway Collapses on Sukhumvit Soi 64/1 in Bangkok [video]


webfact

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, bdenner said:

Strange there is no mention of the "bar bar bor bor" (idocy) of the owner/drivers of these trucks!!!!!

20 + mirrors pointing at the driver - 12 driving lights across the roof (Bling) - and effin mud flaps protruding 30 cm outside the width of the vehicle. Goes back to the days where bus drivers had to open the screen over their engine to show that "my engine is bigger than yours" = Stuff the fact that someone could get caught up in the rotating belts === IDIOTS

Som Non Nah - there is a Budda!

What? It's not the drivers fault. The metal cover wasn't strong enough.. Or was positioned poorly. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, aseanfan said:

Correct - that is on Sukhumivit Road by True Digital Park - I was there and saw it all...very impressed at how they managed to get two huge cranes in place so quickly to rescue the truck that was about to descend into the depths of the man made concrete ringed tube descending to who knows where.

So it wasn't backfilled properly  or not backfilled at all?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

 

It also makes me wonder how they are usually supported. Four squares covering a giant hole with no support in the middle. If we had rectangular pieces covering the hole that makes sense, but squares that meet in the middle with no support underneath?. How does that work?

Paper clips but one of them broke

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 1happykamper said:

What? It's not the drivers fault. The metal cover wasn't strong enough.. Or was positioned poorly. 

Possibly bribe to allow truck to be heavier than legally allowed could be considered driver's fault. Below is screenshot of Thai discussion on it...

 

This is Thai discussion over it...

 

image.png.48dcc39ab0331f62d528b31eb7fb9303.png

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, charleskerins said:

temporary road cover -understand now.

temporary for these tunnels seems quite a long time, most of the roads that have big underground tunnel for electrics like these seem to have these slabs in place for 2-3 years now and opened up for works during the night 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Celsius said:

Has anyone watched the video? They are literally blaming the driver for truck being too heavy for this road.

 

20 hours ago, Celsius said:

Has anyone watched the video? They are literally blaming the driver for truck being too heavy for this road.

This IS Thailand!

 

Where WOULD we be, without TiT!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

 

It also makes me wonder how they are usually supported. Four squares covering a giant hole with no support in the middle. If we had rectangular pieces covering the hole that makes sense, but squares that meet in the middle with no support underneath?. How does that work?

They are all back in place again today so it works somehow (except when it didn't).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Second incident of this type this week. Overloaded truck or not the concrete slab should not have collapsed. Very poor roadbuilding again. Fortunately no one has been killed in either incident. It seems like the higways authority has a lot to answer for what with electrocuting and killing citizens on a regular basis and badly made collapsing concrete covers

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KhunBENQ said:

Just seen a report that the driver will be prosecuted for driving an overloaded vehicle (among other).

Passing the buck that concrete should not have collapsed like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RobU said:

Passing the buck that concrete should not have collapsed like that.

If you look at the pictures, the concrete did not in any way collapse. After they pulled the truck out they put the panels right back, intact.

 

They did dislodge yes, but the concrete held. It still shouldn't have happened, obviously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

If you look at the pictures, the concrete did not in any way collapse. After they pulled the truck out they put the panels right back, intact.

 

They did dislodge yes, but the concrete held. It still shouldn't have happened, obviously.

Agreed the concrete panels were easily dislodged i.e. they collapsed they did not break. Thus the weight of the vehicle is irrelevant. No central support to prevent slippage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...