Jump to content

PM Annoyed 10,000 Baht Digital Wallet Scheme Stuck With Graft-Busters


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, webfact said:

He added that he has waited for a long time for NACC’s recommendation but it has still not come and now thinks there must be another way to kickstart this project.

 NACC is awaiting clear action by the government while the government is waiting for the graft agency’s recommendation

And the people are waiting for their money.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, flyingtlger said:


The NACC is stalling in order to figure out how they can profit off it as well.

Everyone needs to get a piece of the pie.....

Yes, I expect you and me are not the only ones thinking this!

  • Like 2
Posted

Apart from corruption in government, the whole scheme is ridicules, anything digital will and can be scammed, but good if your an alcoholic, shops can fiddle the books easily.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

I am wondering who is in charge in THailand.. We have a Government but they have to wait for the EC, CC, Senate and the NACC to make any decision. What is the use of a government than if everybody must have a say

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, hotchilli said:

 NACC is awaiting clear action by the government while the government is waiting for the graft agency’s recommendation

And the people are waiting for their money.

fantastic for a country where people just looove to wait! 😁

  • Like 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, ikke1959 said:

I am wondering who is in charge in THailand..

 

According to the current Constitution (2017/official translation): 

 

Section 2.  Thailand adopts a democratic regime of government with the King as Head of State. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, bamnutsak said:

 

According to the current Constitution (2017/official translation): 

 

Section 2.  Thailand adopts a democratic regime of government with the King as Head of State. 

I know but that is no answer on my question... Normally the government propose and make laws, and the parties ruling and opposite discuss them and vote. But here everything seems to go first to another institution and than back with or without approval of the institution. If the institutions have so much power why need an elected Government? 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, ikke1959 said:

I know but that is no answer on my question... Normally the government propose and make laws, and the parties ruling and opposite discuss them and vote. But here everything seems to go first to another institution and than back with or without approval of the institution. If the institutions have so much power why need an elected Government? 

 

The PM is looking for maximum coverage of his behind on this one.

 

He needs all these controlling organizations (Council of State, NACC)  on board, to avoid prosecution in the future.

 

An "elected government" is required for appearances.

 

  • Thanks 2
Posted
4 hours ago, bamnutsak said:

 

The PM is looking for maximum coverage of his behind on this one.

 

He needs all these controlling organizations (Council of State, NACC)  on board, to avoid prosecution in the future.

 

An "elected government" is required for appearances.

 

probably he is afraid that if the 10k scheme is cancelled he will be charged with vote buying, which is in fact true too

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...