Jump to content

US Supreme Court rules Colorado cannot ban Trump from presidential ballot


Social Media

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, johnnybangkok said:

And how exactly did he do that? Was it by being black?

Do you believe the country is more racially divided now than it was prior to the Obama Administration? 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Trump offered Pelosi National Guard...she turned it down.

'Pelosi’s spokesman said she was not consulted about the National Guard before Jan. 6. And the former House sergeant-at-arms, who reported to Pelosi, testified that he had no discussions about National Guard troops with any congressional leaders before Jan. 6. Without evidence to back it, we rate Trump’s statement False.  PolitiFact | No proof Trump requested 10,000 Guard troops for Jan. 6 or that Pelosi denied it

 

Fact check: Trump did not request 10,000 Guard troops for Jan. 6 (usatoday.com)

 

AP fact check rates GOP claim Pelosi blocked National Guard on Jan. 6 ‘false’ | The Hill

 

FactChecking Claims About the Jan. 6 Capitol Riot - FactCheck.org

 

Next!

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:

'Pelosi’s spokesman said she was not consulted about the National Guard before Jan. 6. And the former House sergeant-at-arms, who reported to Pelosi, testified that he had no discussions about National Guard troops with any congressional leaders before Jan. 6. Without evidence to back it, we rate Trump’s statement False.  PolitiFact | No proof Trump requested 10,000 Guard troops for Jan. 6 or that Pelosi denied it

 

Fact check: Trump did not request 10,000 Guard troops for Jan. 6 (usatoday.com)

 

AP fact check rates GOP claim Pelosi blocked National Guard on Jan. 6 ‘false’ | The Hill

 

FactChecking Claims About the Jan. 6 Capitol Riot - FactCheck.org

 

Next!

the narrative pelosi wants is exactly what you posted in those links..

https://twitter.com/SpeakerMcCarthy/status/1419992938784952327?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1419992938784952327|twgr^1450b6c2c01d23edda11052d2be7df815ede3f25|twcon^s1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.snopes.com%2Ffact-check%2Fpelosi-national-guard-capitol%2F

 

Edited by frank83628
  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

I post 4 reputable media sources (I could have got you 10) confirming that Trump's statement is false; you post a Twitter comment from McCarthy.

 

I find it really quite amazing how sucked in you all are with what Trump says. He lies ALL OF THE TIME and you fall for it ALL OF THE TIME.

  • Love It 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, johnnybangkok said:

'Pelosi’s spokesman said she was not consulted about the National Guard before Jan. 6. And the former House sergeant-at-arms, who reported to Pelosi, testified that he had no discussions about National Guard troops with any congressional leaders before Jan. 6. Without evidence to back it, we rate Trump’s statement False.  PolitiFact | No proof Trump requested 10,000 Guard troops for Jan. 6 or that Pelosi denied it

 

Fact check: Trump did not request 10,000 Guard troops for Jan. 6 (usatoday.com)

 

AP fact check rates GOP claim Pelosi blocked National Guard on Jan. 6 ‘false’ | The Hill

 

FactChecking Claims About the Jan. 6 Capitol Riot - FactCheck.org

 

Next!

Us intelligent normal folk should have realised by now that it is absolutely no use whatsoever in stating/quoting facts to a trump supporter, because they don't have the mental capacity to process facts, only the nonsense provided by the cult leader, you know the one who raises his clenched tiny fists from his small hands in some sort of show for his goobers. Pathetic really.

 

And although he is back on the ballot papers, I sincerely hope that he doesn't become POTUS again, although the only thing it will show the rest of the world is how stupid it is that a man who is despised and considered a laughing stock by many of them, manages to gain that position. Unbelievable.

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

, more insurrectionists:Trump001.thumb.png.31bc6f196828d52d5809c4dd6be1a94c.png 

Thank for highlighting the difference between 2016 and 2020.

 

In 2016, Hillary did not claim there had been massive fraud, did not organise a protest and id not send her supporters to the Capitol, and they did not assault it in order to steal the election. 

Some people protested and burned Trump's head, as during a Carnival.

 

In 2020, Trump claimed there had been massive fraud, organised a protest and sent them to the Capitol, and they assaulted the Capitol in order to overturn the election.

 

Oh, sorry, wi forgot to mention the similarities! After the 2026 election, Trump claimed there had been massive fraud! 😀

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

no...what Clinton did instead was to start the whole Russian collusion BS she refused to accept trump won legitimately, still doesn't accept it

So she did not send her supporters to assault the Capitol. Thank you again for acknowledging this difference.

 

It can be discussed forever whether the Russian interference had enough impact or not to change election results.

However  it is fact that there had been Russian interference.

Edited by candide
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

Mate - you are correct and there is no opinion in that - those are the facts and they have been clearly established by hearings and tribunals - but not covered much by the media.

 

Agree ! 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

yeah, i saw the google search results...pages of msm articles reading form exactly the same script. Seeing as 95% of media is left bias, including google it's very hard to find non bias results at the click of a finger, i'm certainly not wasting time going through pages to find something for you to accept. What McCarthy said was also raised by others.

 

There is no debating you when you do not accept facts corroborated by the majority of the media. Instead you prefer to take the word of a pathological liar or the Twitter account of Kevin McCarthy.   

  • Sad 1
  • Love It 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

neither did Trump, if you listened to the audio or watched the video, he clearly states..to 'peacefully' march to the capitol.

were those that chose to riot actually Trump supporters??

 

Sorry, I was not precise enough. He sent them to the Capitol after telling them to fight like hell, during a protest called "stop the steal" , and then by themselves, they decided to assault the Capitol. They may have thought that stopping the election certification was like stopping the steal. And when they assaulted the Capitol, Trump did nothing to stop them during hours. He never told them: no no, you misunderstand me, stop it at once! 😀

 

As to your question : that's what the Jan. 6 rioters trial has showed ( that their were Trump supporters).

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

If you've got an extra hour, here's a Tucker Carlson interview with Steven Sund, the Capitol Police Chief at the time of the Jan 6 protest.  The security failures on Jan 6 weren't failures as much as the plan.

 

https://tuckercarlson.com/the-tucker-carlson-encounter-steven-sund/

 

 

Please show the quote confirming that Pelosi refused a national guard offer by Trump. I did not find it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

thanks, i couldn't remember the dudes name. funny how these things are now only covered by independent journalists or outlets, msm & social media is totally corrupted and bought out. so much clear to see since 2016!

Lol! Where is it written in this interview transcript that "Trump offered Pelosi National Guard...she turned it down."?

Edited by candide
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

If you've got an extra hour, here's a Tucker Carlson interview with Steven Sund, the Capitol Police Chief at the time of the Jan 6 protest.  The security failures on Jan 6 weren't failures as much as the plan.

 

https://tuckercarlson.com/the-tucker-carlson-encounter-steven-sund/

 

 

Fox didn't aired that interview for a reason any person with an iota of a brain would figured out.  

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...