Netanyahu vows to push ahead with assault on Rafah, despite international criticism

[Social Media]

 

As tensions escalate and international scrutiny intensifies, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu remains resolute in his commitment to push forward with a planned assault on the southern Gaza city of Rafah. Despite facing criticism from various quarters, including world leaders and human rights organizations, Netanyahu's determination to "eliminate the remaining terrorist battalions in Rafah" underscores the complexity and gravity of the situation in the region.

 

In a recent statement following a meeting with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, Netanyahu reiterated his government's promise to proceed with the military offensive in Rafah. Emphasizing the need to prioritize the safety of civilians, Netanyahu affirmed that measures would be taken to enable the population to evacuate the area before any military operation commences. He stressed that Israel's commitment to minimizing civilian casualties remains unwavering, despite the challenges posed by the ongoing conflict.

 

 

The decision to launch the assault on Rafah comes in the wake of Hamas's deadly attack on October 7, which resulted in the loss of thousands of lives and the abduction of hundreds of individuals, some of whom are still being held as hostages. As the conflict enters its sixth month with little progress in ceasefire negotiations, the toll on both Palestinian civilians and Israeli security forces continues to mount.

 

According to reports from the Hamas-run Gaza health ministry, the number of Palestinians killed in the conflict has surpassed 31,000, highlighting the devastating impact of the ongoing violence on the civilian population. However, these figures have been met with skepticism, as they do not differentiate between civilian casualties and combatants.

 

The humanitarian situation in Gaza has also reached dire levels, with over one million people displaced from their homes and a quarter of the population facing starvation, according to the United Nations. Despite efforts by aid organizations to provide assistance, Israeli restrictions and security concerns have hindered the delivery of essential supplies, exacerbating the suffering of those trapped in the conflict zone.

 

Amid growing international concern over the escalation of violence, leaders from around the world have expressed apprehension about the potential consequences of a military offensive in Rafah. Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi warned that such action could have "grave repercussions on the whole region," underscoring the need for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict.

 

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz echoed these sentiments, urging Israel to consider alternative approaches to achieving its objectives in Gaza. He emphasized the importance of prioritizing the well-being of civilians and questioned whether the costs of a military offensive could be justified in light of the humanitarian crisis unfolding in the region.

 

Even within Israel's staunchest ally, the United States, voices of dissent have emerged, with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer calling for a new election in Israel and questioning Netanyahu's leadership. While Netanyahu dismissed Schumer's comments as "wholly inappropriate," President Joe Biden acknowledged the concerns raised by the Senate leader, describing his remarks as a "good speech."

 

Despite the mounting pressure and criticism, Netanyahu remains steadfast in his determination to confront Hamas and ensure Israel's security. He asserts that the elimination of Hamas is essential for the prospects of peace and stability in the region, emphasizing the existential threat posed by the terrorist organization to Israel's security and well-being.

 

As the conflict in Rafah continues to unfold, the international community faces a daunting challenge in finding a resolution that addresses the legitimate security concerns of Israel while also upholding the rights and dignity of the Palestinian people. Netanyahu's resolve in the face of adversity underscores the complexities and enduring nature of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, highlighting the urgent need for concerted diplomatic efforts to achieve a sustainable peace in the region.

 

18.03.24

Source

 

[thaibeachlovers]

6 hours ago, Social Media said:

Despite the mounting pressure and criticism, Netanyahu remains steadfast in his determination to confront Hamas and ensure Israel's security. He asserts that the elimination of Hamas is essential for the prospects of peace and stability in the region, emphasizing the existential threat posed by the terrorist organization to Israel's security and well-being.

Rubbish. Even if he managed to kill every Hamas, another organisation will take it's place, if not inside Palestinian areas outside israel's reach.

Human's always strive for freedom, and unless israel gives Palestinians freedom israel is doomed to be attacked till there is a homeland for Palestinians.

 

The present conflict ensures a steady supply of fighters to any Palestinian organisation that will fight back, as the boys that saw their families killed grow up enough to become fighters. Their heroes will be those that kill israelis.

Welcome to the forever war.

[billd766]

1 hour ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Rubbish. Even if he managed to kill every Hamas, another organisation will take it's place, if not inside Palestinian areas outside israel's reach.

Human's always strive for freedom, and unless israel gives Palestinians freedom israel is doomed to be attacked till there is a homeland for Palestinians.

 

The present conflict ensures a steady supply of fighters to any Palestinian organisation that will fight back, as the boys that saw their families killed grow up enough to become fighters. Their heroes will be those that kill israelis.

Welcome to the forever war.

IMHO the only way that this war and genocide will end and the hostages released, will be when the Israeli people remove Netanyahu from power and proscribe the Likud party as a terrorist organisation. The were proscribed in the 1940s once before for terrorism.

 

It would be down to the Israeli people to do it legally through an election, though the Israeli allies and weapons suppliers would have to do their part, as would the banks and financiers.

[2baht]

Netanyahoo is the scum of the Earth!

[NativeBob]

there are more than a dozen of military groups in Palestine. Hamas - is just a "movement" has very little "say" over those battalions. Some are older than Oslo's accord, some light equipped - many different, each has its own sources of financing, leaders and methods. 

Hamas is not some "homogenic" army, it is not even an army. So who does he fight against?

[Neeranam]

8 hours ago, Social Media said:

The decision to launch the assault on Rafah comes in the wake of Hamas's deadly attack on October 7, which resulted in the loss of thousands of lives and the abduction of hundreds of individuals, some of whom are still being held as hostages.

I've told you a million times, don't exaggerate!~

 

[Neeranam]

18 minutes ago, NativeBob said:

there are more than a dozen of military groups in Palestine. Hamas - is just a "movement" has very little "say" over those battalions. Some are older than Oslo's accord, some light equipped - many different, each has its own sources of financing, leaders and methods. 

Hamas is not some "homogenic" army, it is not even an army. So who does he fight against?

He isn't fighting in the traditional sense, he is indiscriminately bombing, to which even his main supporter, Biden, admitted. Gazans can't defend themselves, they're at the mercy of Netanyahu, who wants them all to move out of the area. 

[Neeranam]

30 minutes ago, billd766 said:

The were proscribed in the 1940s once before for terrorism.

Indeed, and the paramilitary organizations were transformed to the national military, which marked a significant shift in the dynamics of the conflict.

And some here have the audacity to claim this conflict started in 2023 ! 

[NativeBob]

5 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

Gazans can't defend themselves, they're at the mercy of Netanyahu, who wants them all to move out of the area. 

Gazans? I thought its about "exterminating Hamas", not about direct shots from Merkava tanks on civilian houses and hospitals. 
Although heavy armored tanks in one of the densest city is worst than an elephant in china's shop. 

[Bkk Brian]

7 minutes ago, NativeBob said:

Gazans? I thought its about "exterminating Hamas", not about direct shots from Merkava tanks on civilian houses and hospitals. 
Although heavy armored tanks in one of the densest city is worst than an elephant in china's shop. 

That depends if the terrorists or their infrastructure are lurking inside tanks can be very useful.

[Bkk Brian]

12 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

Indeed, and the paramilitary organizations were transformed to the national military, which marked a significant shift in the dynamics of the conflict.

And some here have the audacity to claim this conflict started in 2023 ! 

And some here have the audacity to claim this conflict started in 2023

 

The war did, 7th Oct actually.

[thaibeachlovers]

14 hours ago, 2baht said:

Netanyahoo is the scum of the Earth!

IMO history will equate him to certain characters in the 20th century that are not looked on with favour.

[thaibeachlovers]

14 hours ago, NativeBob said:

Gazans? I thought its about "exterminating Hamas", not about direct shots from Merkava tanks on civilian houses and hospitals. 
Although heavy armored tanks in one of the densest city is worst than an elephant in china's shop. 

Tanks are of little use against an elusive guerrilla force , but they are excellent for killing children in their homes, or running over unarmed civilians trying to get food off trucks.

[thaibeachlovers]

Seems to me that while everyone is riled up by a possible invasion of Rafah, it may be deflection while they do something even worse on the West Bank.

[georgegeorgia]

17 hours ago, 2baht said:

Netanyahoo is the scum of the Earth!

What a nasty thing to say about anyone

Just proves your character of a man 

[Nick Carter icp]

2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

IMO history will equate him to certain characters in the 20th century that are not looked on with favour.

 

    You are allowed to say *Adolf Hitler* , there is no need to keep hinting all the time .

Just say *Netanyahu is like Hitler and Jews are like Nazis*, no need for all the pretence 

[2baht]

10 minutes ago, georgegeorgia said:

What a nasty thing to say about anyone

Just proves your character of a man 

Tell me something nice about him! 🤔And for the drivel that comes off your keyboard, you should NEVER question ANYONES manhood!