Jump to content

Thailand explores extending emergency coverage to foreign tourists


webfact

Recommended Posts

Uh, obvious but will say it anyway: enforce the laws.... if they were enforced on highways, fewer accidents. If they were enforced for water sports, fewer accidents.

A stitch in time saves nine months in a hospital... or a morgue

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, n00dle said:

 

 I don't think you could get much further off base, but explain to me how providing tourists with emergency medical care is a cash grab.

By International law, this is a standard, but I guess you don't know that either. Secondly, 99% of tourists have insurance or pay for their medical care here.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ChaiyaTH said:

Why are the few rare foreigners not paying, a huge threat to the healthcare system, if they can care endless Thais on a 30 baht scheme? ....

 

in no way am i a thai bleeding heart... but gotta be fair here. how are tourists, thai or any other denomination, treated by hospitals in the west when they have an accident?

 

i would guess that it is pretty much the same as we are treated here, but we just never hear about it.

Edited by Pouatchee
typo...damn left hand
  • Confused 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChaiyaTH said:

By International law, this is a standard, but I guess you don't know that either. Secondly, 99% of tourists have insurance or pay for their medical care here.

 

Im sorry are you simple, perhaps high?? what does this have to do with you original post or any of the gibberish you added later have to do with the introduction of universal emergency care for tourists? 

 

 

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cabradelmar said:

Wow. A give back to the millions of tourist that keep this economy afloat. But at what cost to whom? Because there is no such thing as a free lunch. 

 

Seems like it would be simple enough to add $5 to the tax on international flights and nobody would even know the difference on a $200-$3000  ticket.  At 40 million arrivals and 40 million departures, that would be $400 million.  I suspect that would cover it nicely.

 

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

Me!

For most of the 20 years that I lived in Thailand I never had health insurance. Moved there when I was 33, left when I was 53. Never really had health issues that required it, luckily.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, impulse said:

 

Seems like it would be simple enough to add $5 to the tax on international flights and nobody would even know the difference on a $200-$3000  ticket.  At 40 million arrivals and 40 million departures, that would be $400 million.  I suspect that would cover it nicely.

 

With plenty left over to line enough pockets to please any Thai. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Cabradelmar said:

With plenty left over to line enough pockets to please any Thai. 

 

An excellent observation, but I figured that was a given.

 

Still, I wonder how much it would cost to provide every tourist with basic emergency cover, and how much they'd have to jack up the tax on flights?

 

And would that added tax be offset with reduced travel insurance prices for the more responsible folk who buy it?  That could make it a win-win for tourism.

 

And finally, would tourists do even more stupid stunts knowing they're covered if it goes sideways? (Though I'd hope they exempt Darwin Award attempts from the list of stuff that's covered...)

 

Edited by impulse
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Yagoda said:

What kind of idiot travels or even lives in Thaialnd without insurance.

Skint Idiots, and there are many of them.

Traveling on a budget.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ChaiyaTH said:

By International law, this is a standard, but I guess you don't know that either.

Please cite that law and whether Thailand is bound by it. International "laws" require a nation's ratification to accept responsibility and compliance with such "laws", ie., the Geneva Convention, UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1951 Refugee Convention. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Cabradelmar said:

Wow. A give back to the millions of tourist that keep this economy afloat. But at what cost to whom? Because there is no such thing as a free lunch. 

 

Make the filthy retirees pay for it with a new income tax policy.

  • Sad 1
  • Love It 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hotchilli said:

Skint Idiots, and there are many of them.

Traveling on a budget.

And those who don't read their policy coverage, restrictions and disallowances. Having to purchase Thai government health insurance for entry should pre-empt questions of applicability as the Thai government becomes the guarantee, however, may have exceptions such as injury in connection with commission of a crime.  

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

An excellent observation, but I figured that was a given.

 

Still, I wonder how much it would cost to provide every tourist with basic emergency cover, and how much they'd have to jack up the tax on flights?

 

And would that added tax be offset with reduced travel insurance prices for the more responsible folk who buy it?  That could make it a win-win for tourism.

 

And finally, would tourists do even more stupid stunts knowing they're covered if it goes sideways? (Though I'd hope they exempt Darwin Award attempts from the list of stuff that's covered...)

 

I'd rather the scheme pay for basis emergency medical treatment for the uninsured, if needed (there were only 400 cases of tourist injury, of all kinds, last year, but no mention of how many of those where uninsured - my guess most where insured) vs compensating tourist for their death (of which there where 185 tourist deaths last year). And the only reason I say that is so that hospitals will be less likely to turn people away - like they did to the man from Taiwan who later died as a result. If this gets the greedy Thai medical establishment to at least know they will get paid for rendering services, then people will be less likely to needlessly die due to hospital greed. Unfortunately, my guess is if tourist know they're covered for emergency medical they will do more stupid stuff. But then you can't fix all stupid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Srikcir said:

Thailand has been there and done it before.

COVID insurance for foreigners in Thailand 90-day coverage to cost 2,500 to 14,000 baht. About $70-$380 at today's exchange rate.

https://www.thaiembassy.com

Different. That was insurance tourist had to get to get their COE to be allowed to enter. This new scheme covers anyone injured (without insurance) or killed, though a nominal tourist tax on all tourists (regardless of who you are or if you already pay for your own insurance already).

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Cabradelmar said:

This new scheme covers anyone injured (without insurance) or killed, though a nominal tourist tax on all tourists

 

The much-discussed tourist tax is not mentioned anywhere in the article - this appears to be a separate scheme.

 

9 hours ago, ChaiyaTH said:

Why are the few rare foreigners not paying, a huge threat to the healthcare system

 

They're not. Even if you believed all the stories about non-paying tourists (mostly generated by one particular director of one particular hospital on one particular island), the unpaid cost would have averaged out to less than 10 baht per foreign arrival. The "solution" dreamed up to this problem was the 300 baht tourist tax mentioned above - I think we can all do the math on that.

 

8 hours ago, impulse said:

Seems like it would be simple enough to add $5 to the tax on international flights and nobody would even know the difference

 

Yes, they could easily have done that. But they wanted only foreigners to pay, and the airlines told them there was no way to collect a charge that only applied to certain passengers. So, the whole plan has been (temporarily?) shelved.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

thailand as recent in the news, if you don't show your credit card, they move you and you might die... but not their problem and no serious fines either...

 

20 million, 30, 40 million tourists.... ask them euh... 100 baht on entrance and insured?

 

off course nothing for expats living here that soon will pay taxes in return for NOTHING at all, free pm 2.5

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, khunjeff said:

The much-discussed tourist tax is not mentioned anywhere in the article - this appears to be a separate scheme.

No such thing as a free lunch... Someone is paying and it will (if not now, eventually) be tourist (one way or another). 

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...