1 hour ago, scorecard said:

Sadly NO.

Come on, the dog down the street is better than that geriatric you call a president. He rarely knows where he is.

5 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Any psychiatrist that proffers a diagnosis of a person without having examined that person should be struck off.

You seem to have no problem about making many comments on many forums about peoples' mental ability without ever meeting them!

 

 

Edited April 9, 20242 yr by scottiejohn

5 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Then I have a mental disorder.

 

 

Agreed!

18 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

3 reasons, actually.  

 

1) Impeachment is a political process, and they could have video of Joe walking across the Whitehouse lawn with a bloody machete in one hand and a severed head in the other, and the Dems still wouldn't vote to remove him from office.

 

2) Kamala Harris.  Best insurance a president could hope for if impeachment were a possibility.  Like, if he knew he was telling campaign porkies about influence peddling and figured the truth would come out while he's in office.

 

3)  Even if they did manage to remove him from office, Kamala could pardon him (a'la Ford/Nixon).  Wait for a new president to prosecute a private citizen and I doubt a pardon is in the cards.

 

Makes no sense to actually impeach him.  But it makes a lot of sense to use the subpoena power of a House Impeachment investigation to compel witnesses and demand records.

 

 

 

However, it's only after they failed to provide any valid evidence that they changed their tune and decided (well, it seems they decided it) not to hold an impeachment vote. In particular as several GOP congressmen have stated there was no valid evidence.

 

Their master would be the most happy man if they were 'only' able to adopt the impeachment articles with a simple House majority, in order to confirm his false equivalence theory ( which was the cause of the investigation)

 

 

1 hour ago, Captain Monday said:

Yes, should be interesting

He said in 2016 it was rigged so he would lose despite the polls. Then to everybody's surprise (besides perhaps Michael Moore),  Trump won Then in In 2020 he said it he could lose only if it had been would be" rigged" Trump Lost, resulting in the insurrection

What will Trump say when he wins in 2024?

 

Nothing has changed about the electoral system

Trump: ‘The only way we’re going to lose this election is if the election is rigged'

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/512424-trump-the-only-way-we-are-going-to-lose-this-election-is-if-the/

 

 

 

It doesn't matter what he says. It only matters that the election fraud is exposed. Too many people focus on Trump, rather than the global movement behind what Trump represents. Trump, the MAGA movement, and this entire war against the globalists and the mafia like cabal they use to inflict tyranny across the planet, are igniting a genuine change of psychology in humanity. There is going to be a backlash against taking advantage of others for personal gain the likes of which the world has never seen.  And in that movement, we are finally going to see changes to the corrupt and fraudulent voting systems that the globalists leveraged to install the Biden regime in 2020.

 

The fact that a corrupt system wasn't corrupt enough to defeat Trump (or was intentionally damped to allow him to win) in certain instances is irrelevant.

 

Trump is not to be feared. He is a wrecking ball that is going to destroy all of the diseased and corrupt institutions that will no longer serve us as we move into a new age. Trump's mental state is just fine. Try actually listening to him. He isn't losing it. He isn't fearful. Trump is well aware of his role in this larger script. And as a reality TV star, Trump knows how to act. He is a small part of a much larger plan...a plan that has been in the works since at least the assassination of JFK. A plan to rid the world of the globalist tyranny. A plan supported by huge factions of the US military.  And a plan which is going to come to fruition as soon as this calm before the storm is complete.

 

Embrace what Trump represents. It will be the first true freedom any of us have ever known in our lifetimes. It's going to be rough over the coming months, but the other side is well worth it.  The best truly is yet to come. This isn't Trump's campaign. It is ours. Trump is just the speartip.

 

2 minutes ago, candide said:

However, it's only after they failed to provide any valid evidence that they changed their tune and decided (well, it seems they decided it) not to hold an impeachment vote. In particular as several GOP congressmen have stated there was no valid evidence.

 

 

They never changed their tune.  They never figured removal from office was even a remote possibility, just on the votes alone.  Let alone the mind bending possibility of a Kamala presidency.  They just wanted the investigation for the subpoena power.  Of course, it would have been politically stupid to say that going in.  

 

 

2 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

 

They never changed their tune.  They never figured removal from office was even a remote possibility, just on the votes alone.  Let alone the mind bending possibility of a Kamala presidency.  They just wanted the investigation for the subpoena power.  Of course, it would have been politically stupid to say that going in.  

 

 

Nice try!

You conveniently ignore there isn't only the removal vote, which requires a 2/3 majority.

The first impeachment vote requires only a simple House majority (ex. Trump's impeachment). They found out they could not even win it because not all GOP Reps. were ready to vote the articles, as they did not have valid evidence.

2 hours ago, Captain Monday said:

Attendance not so good lately. He needs new material. Maybe get an actually policy platform going instead of build a wall, deepstate, witch hunt, "drill baby drill " and devising silly names for his rivals. 

 

Trump had 1.5 million people at his inaugural blowing Obama crowd size out of the water. SAD

 

And Biden?  🤣

1 hour ago, scottiejohn said:

Everything Nothing I say is baseless. 

Wow. Clever and creative, leaving me crying in the corner in the foetal position.

Edited April 9, 20242 yr by Yagoda

Gitmo with other terrorists. 

40 minutes ago, uncletiger said:

It doesn't matter what he says. It only matters that the election fraud is exposed. Too many people focus on Trump, rather than the global movement behind what Trump represents. Trump, the MAGA movement, and this entire war against the globalists and the mafia like cabal they use to inflict tyranny across the planet, are igniting a genuine change of psychology in humanity. There is going to be a backlash against taking advantage of others for personal gain the likes of which the world has never seen.  And in that movement, we are finally going to see changes to the corrupt and fraudulent voting systems that the globalists leveraged to install the Biden regime in 2020.

What a load of codswallop, Trump and his allies used the "big lie "propaganda to promote the election was stolen. 

 

Fact of the matter was that Trump's DOJ, Director of National Intelligence, Director of Cybersecurity and the Infrastructure Secirity Agency as well as Trump;s campaign staff dismissed those election fraud cliams. State and federal judges, election officialks and state governors also determined that the claims were baseless.

 

Trump's legal team brought 63 lawsuits before the Supreme Court but none were successful. Forensic audits were launched by the Republicans and came up with nothing. 

 

How long are you going to talk this kind of nonsense when every avenues to investigate the baseless claims by Trump's allies came up short. Their last resort was the attempt to stage the 'coup'. Fortunately that failed too. 

45 minutes ago, nauseus said:

 

And Biden?  🤣

He is the President. No need for Nuremberg rallies or cross burning 

39 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Wow. Clever and creative, leaving me crying in the corner in the foetal position.

Where I believe you belong and hope you remain!

Edited April 9, 20242 yr by scottiejohn

27 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Trump's legal team brought 63 lawsuits before the Supreme Court but none were successful. Forensic audits were launched by the Republicans and came up with nothing. 

 

Jeez, not only did you get the facts wrong, you're not even in the right country.

 

https://jakartaglobe.id/news/constitutional-court-receives-63-lawsuits-disputing-election-results

 

But, like I posted before, you can make up anything you want about Trump and it won't get taken down here.

 

 

12 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

Jeez, not only did you get the facts wrong, you're not even in the right country.

 

https://jakartaglobe.id/news/constitutional-court-receives-63-lawsuits-disputing-election-results

 

But, like I posted before, you can make up anything you want about Trump and it won't get taken down here.

 

 

Not all before the Supreme court but:

 

"It is 63 losses by Trump and his allies," Elias told PolitiFact the morning of Jan. 8. "We treat each case separately — so if there is a federal case and a state case, we treat them as two cases. We only ever count a case one time — so if there is an appeal or remand, we do not treat that as a separate loss."

 

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/jan/08/joe-biden/joe-biden-right-more-60-trumps-election-lawsuits-l/

 

Edited April 9, 20242 yr by candide

8 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

Jeez, not only did you get the facts wrong, you're not even in the right country.

 

https://jakartaglobe.id/news/constitutional-court-receives-63-lawsuits-disputing-election-results

 

But, like I posted before, you can make up anything you want about Trump and it won't get taken down here.

 

 

The difference between the Indonesia lawsuits and Trump’s election fraud propaganda is that the former are still in the appeal stage while the latter have been adjudicated and dismissed.
 

 Trump's legal team sought a path to bring a case before the Supreme Court, but none of the 63 lawsuits they filed were successful.^[

8 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Perhaps I should start calling you Mr Jandal.

 

Jandals are the brand name of flip flop shoes that were sold in NZ a while back.

🙂

I don't know what you are talking about.

 

Early polls have little predictive value.

7 hours ago, ftpjtm said:

So when should candidates start to be concerned about what the public thinks about themselves and their policies? A month before the election? A week before the election? 

You are asking me the best way to integrate policy with political campaigns?

 

Here's a hint. A politician has policy convictions before the campaign begins. Their campaign is about educating the public about their policies.

 

We are not yet at the point in this campaign for the public to really care about policies.

1 hour ago, impulse said:

 

 

They never changed their tune.  They never figured removal from office was even a remote possibility, just on the votes alone.  Let alone the mind bending possibility of a Kamala presidency.  They just wanted the investigation for the subpoena power.  Of course, it would have been politically stupid to say that going in.  

 

 

So, you are saying that the Biden investigation failed because of lack of supporting facts, but the Republicans knew this at the start of the investigation?

23 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

The difference between the Indonesia lawsuits and Trump’s election fraud propaganda is that the former are still in the appeal stage while the latter have been adjudicated and dismissed.
 

 Trump's legal team sought a path to bring a case before the Supreme Court, but none of the 63 lawsuits they filed were successful.^[

 

So, your "63 lawsuits with no wins" came from a statement that Biden made on Jan 7, 2021?  Long before any lawsuits could have possibly made it through any real proceeding?

Other than the "63" being wrong, "before the Supreme Court" being wrong, "none was successful" being wrong, I guess I'd have to agree with the rest.

2 hours ago, Photoguy21 said:

Come on, the dog down the street is better than that geriatric you call a president. He rarely knows where he is.

Or you are confused.

 

Perhaps you can review how much you lost on Truth Social.

1 minute ago, Danderman123 said:

So, you are saying that the Biden investigation failed because of lack of supporting facts, but the Republicans knew this at the start of the investigation?

 

Who said it failed?

 

Just now, impulse said:

 

So, your "63 lawsuits with no wins" came from a statement that Biden made on Jan 7, 2021?  Long before any lawsuits could have possibly made it through any real proceeding?

Other than the "63" being wrong, "before the Supreme Court" being wrong, "none was successful" being wrong, I guess I'd have to agree with the rest.

What are you talking about?

 

Trump lost tons of lawsuits during the fight over the 2020 election.

 

Do you disagree?

4 hours ago, Photoguy21 said:

But is he better than the geriatric the USA currently has?

How old is Donald Trump?

3 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

Who said it failed?

 

I will let you hope that the Biden investigation results in an impeachment vote.

5 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

You are asking me the best way to integrate policy with political campaigns?

 

Here's a hint. A politician has policy convictions before the campaign begins. Their campaign is about educating the public about their policies.

 

We are not yet at the point in this campaign for the public to really care about policies.

I hope you're right. Because so far Trump has been pretty effective at convincing the public that Democrats are using "lawfare" to prosecute a political opponent, even though "we are not yet at the point in this campaign for the public to really care".

On 4/8/2024 at 6:52 AM, george said:

What is Donald Trump's mental state?

He don't have one .

he is as stable as Hitler in 1945  , a totally deranged Narcissist,,, with reality issues ,, he should be in an institution  with bars on the windows ...only complete fools  would want him  as a president .

Edited April 9, 20242 yr by liddelljohn

On 4/8/2024 at 12:52 AM, george said:

What is Donald Trump's mental state? I direct the question primarily to those working in psychology, psychiatry, neuropsychiatry, etc., and prefer serious and professional answers. I don't work as a psychologist, but I've studied this for many, many years and have a great interest in the dark triad.

I'm sort of guessing Josephine's original posting wasn't directed at AN members - I doubt we have many working in those professions here 😁.

 

But to answer her - the man is a raving lunatic.  What that says about around 50% of the US electorate, I'll leave her to contemplate.

On 4/8/2024 at 2:02 AM, worgeordie said:

Dangerous , as are his supporters ,did not realise there were so many 

stupid people in the USA ,that support him , he has divided America...

 

regards Worgeordie 

I believe those sentiments are shared with the majority of the world outside the US.  I have difficulty understanding how he's ever secured a single vote. Baffling.