Judge Denies Trump's Mistrial Request Over Stormy Daniels Testimony

[scottiejohn]

4 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

(BLM) activists seeking to raise funds more like

What has that pointless comment got to do with the derivation of the two words I was trying to discuss with you?

[scottiejohn]

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

Sorry! No, I do not know what all anti-Americans whole worlds revolve around, and that's not what I said. Again, what I said was: Woke describes anti-Americans whose whole world revolves around racial discrimination and/or sexual harassment.

 

We clear now? 

 

NO!

[Yellowtail]

2 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

NO!

YES!

[frank83628]

14 hours ago, Walker88 said:

That you cannot understand the connection, doesn't mean people with IQs right of the mean on the Bell Curve cannot.

 

@pomchop pointed it out for those challenged by a loss in the Birth Lottery, or those with a brain eating worm in the area previously occupied by their frontal cortex.

 

Because the case is particular to a NY State statute, which makes it a felony to falsify business records if the intent is to influence an election, the embarrassing nature of the tryst with Stormy had to be pointed out to the jury. Not only was it necessary to present a view counter to trump (he has denied the affair, but her detailed descriptions lend credence to her side), but to note certain details that would be shameful, such as the spanking on trump's bloated fanny with a rolled up magazine with him on its cover, the comments about him comparing the adult movie star to his daughter, his lack of condom use, etc.

 

Tie in his behavior with Hope Hicks' testimony that trump voiced to her his concerns that the publicity would hurt him in the election, plus all the documents showing how the payoff was accounted for, grossed up to account for taxes, etc., and the prosecution makes the case in such a way that it meets the level of felony, according to NY State law.

 

The cross examination will be amusing, as the defense has to be careful not to elicit yet more embarrassing details from Stormy. Also, the defense has to be careful if it tries to deny the tryst took place, because Karen McDougal has yet to take the stand.

 

McDougal will testify to a long affair, while Stormy just has the one kinky night. With both women, prosecution will show both serial philandering as well as kinky behavior and (have suggested) incestuous thought processes. Again, toss in Hope Hicks' testimony, and a reasonable person is likely to conclude trump feared the damage it would do to his election chances.

 

While there may be ancillary concerns trump might have had---such as his 3rd wife (how ironic that she was a softcore porn model) finding out, plus the general embarrassment of a fat old blubber butt getting spanked by a then-27 year old adult film star---just so long as one concern was how it would impact the election reaches the level of felony per NY State law.

you are such a bore. i hope you spook stories are more interesting.. even if they a fiction!

[G_Money]

4 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

What like racially abusing and sexually harassing people? 
 

 

ProofExamples?

 

Without a doubt you should be able to provide a smorgasbord full.

Edited May 9 by G_Money

[G_Money]

1 hour ago, frank83628 said:

you are such a bore. i hope you spook stories are more interesting.. even if they a fiction!

I must admit.  He would make a great fiction novelist.  For those willing to endure the pain of reading past the first paragraph.
 

Most of the forum’s journalists would have to agree.

[jerrymahoney]

From NY Times as of 04:55 Bangkok time:

 

4:14 p.m. ET

 

2 hours ago

 

We’ve just heard that Karen McDougal will not be called as a witness.

Edited May 9 by jerrymahoney

[Skipalongcassidy]

19 hours ago, JCauto said:

 

Again, I defer to your experience and expertise in this matter, having been happily and exclusively married for almost three decades to the same woman (no, she's not Thai). 

That right there completely explains your warped point of view... 555555

[Skipalongcassidy]

20 hours ago, Scouse123 said:

 

 

You take offence at an avatar supporting one of the best and most accomplished football teams the world has ever seen?

 

Who cares... get a life.

[Skipalongcassidy]

MARC THIESSEN: I think this whole thing is helping him enormously. I feel very badly for President Trump that he has to go through this. But it's political gold for him. First of all, it's creating sympathy for him. He's facing 91 charges at the federal, state and local level. Charles Manson faced 10. Our polls show that people think this is unfair. And so it's creating sympathy for Donald Trump. Second thing it's doing is distracting us from the issues that voters say they care about. I mean, our campuses are on fire. The border is on fire. The world is on fire. We've got wars raging on two continents. We just learned that Joe Biden has threatened to cut off aid to Israel if they go into Rafah. And the left wants us to talk about a porn star. Voters look at that and they say, what are these people talking about? They're focused on the wrong thing. And then the third thing is it's forcing him into a basement strategy. So the reason Donald Trump lost in 2020 is because people liked his policies, but they didn't like his inflammatory style. They didn't like the way he behaved and the way he talked. And they were kind of tired of it. Well, he can't say anything inflammatory when he's sitting in a courtroom all day long, right? He can't say things that are offensive to people when he's in a courtroom. And so, the reality is that he's not offending people. 

[Scouse123]

1 hour ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

Who cares... get a life.

You are the one who needs to get a life, you think AN was created solely for you and your rants?

 

What a clown.

[Scouse123]

23 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

In other words, you can't define "woke".

 

 

@Skipalongcassidy can't define anything, only his own bigoted points of view.

[Scouse123]

29 minutes ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

MARC THIESSEN: I think this whole thing is helping him enormously. I feel very badly for President Trump that he has to go through this. But it's political gold for him. First of all, it's creating sympathy for him. He's facing 91 charges at the federal, state and local level. Charles Manson faced 10. Our polls show that people think this is unfair. And so it's creating sympathy for Donald Trump. Second thing it's doing is distracting us from the issues that voters say they care about. I mean, our campuses are on fire. The border is on fire. The world is on fire. We've got wars raging on two continents. We just learned that Joe Biden has threatened to cut off aid to Israel if they go into Rafah. And the left wants us to talk about a porn star. Voters look at that and they say, what are these people talking about? They're focused on the wrong thing. And then the third thing is it's forcing him into a basement strategy. So the reason Donald Trump lost in 2020 is because people liked his policies, but they didn't like his inflammatory style. They didn't like the way he behaved and the way he talked. And they were kind of tired of it. Well, he can't say anything inflammatory when he's sitting in a courtroom all day long, right? He can't say things that are offensive to people when he's in a courtroom. And so, the reality is that he's not offending people. 

 

 

Get your MAGA hat out, Trump to the rescue.

 

91 charges, were they all made up? And people like you think he's fit for President.

 

I THINK NOT.

[Danderman123]

21 hours ago, G_Money said:

And exactly what words of his description IS NOT true in defining WOKE?

 

 

 

Flag burning

[Danderman123]

3 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

From NY Times as of 04:55 Bangkok time:

 

4:14 p.m. ET

 

2 hours ago

 

We’ve just heard that Karen McDougal will not be called as a witness.

Yeah, they really don't need her at this point. Either the jury believes Trump or not.

[Danderman123]

13 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Putting Stormy on the stand was the whole point of the made-up crime.

 

They want to humiliate Trump. They will probably get a conviction because the judge is a Trump hater, but even if they don't all the leftist morons that think he's a criminal will still think he's a criminal, and all the non-moron leftist will keep pretending he's a criminal. 

 

Meanwhile, they're all stocked up on tissue and lotion so they can all read about Stormy and Trump's pecker, and dream about Trump going to jail and getting raped. 

Trump invited her testimony by claiming he never had sex with her.

[Danderman123]

13 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Are there people in the world that are unaware of racial discrimination and/or sexual harassment? 

 

No, it stands for anti-Americans whose whole world revolves around racial discrimination and/or sexual harassment.

You would be amazed by the number of Trump supporters here who don't recognize how much women resent the Harvey Weinstein approach of coercing women into sex. "Woke" began when women became vocal about men using their position of power to extort women for sex.

 

To be fair, some women do it, too.

 

 

[G_Money]

19 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Flag burning

 

Umm, OK!

 

 

 

 

[Walker88]

@Hawaiian It seems 'somebody' deleted your post before I had a chance to respond.

 

I understand that intelligence and facts are unfamiliar territory to trumpers, so just for you, here's some lines more in keeping with your preferences:

 

Make (insert your personal favorite here) Great Again

 

Stop the Steal

 

Lock (Him or Her, your choice) Up

 

How's that? Get your juices flowing, does it? Puts a stop to that ennui?

 

You can use all caps like your messiah, too. Add some meaning to your life.

 

I believe this site has a block function, so if facts bore you, I won't feel the least bit offended if you use that function and add me to your list. Given that your life must be so full of adventure and rewarding experiences, saving you the time to scroll past my posts might allow you to maximize your enjoyment before your time in this Earthly iteration runs out.

[Yellowtail]

15 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

You would be amazed by the number of Trump supporters here who don't recognize how much women resent the Harvey Weinstein approach of coercing women into sex. "Woke" began when women became vocal about men using their position of power to extort women for sex.

 

To be fair, some women do it, too.

 

 

You mean the "me-too" movement? That all ended with Tara Reade. 

 

It's funny that someone like you, that has a whole thread devoted to bragging about the how many bargirls you bang gets worked up over Harvey. 

[Danderman123]

1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

You mean the "me-too" movement? That all ended with Tara Reade. 

 

It's funny that someone like you, that has a whole thread devoted to bragging about the how many bargirls you bang gets worked up over Harvey. 

Because you don't understand the concept of consent vs coercive sex.

 

 

[Hawaiian]

5 minutes ago, Walker88 said:

@Hawaiian It seems 'somebody' deleted your post before I had a chance to respond.

 

I understand that intelligence and facts are unfamiliar territory to trumpers, so just for you, here's some lines more in keeping with your preferences:

 

Make (insert your personal favorite here) Great Again

 

Stop the Steal

 

Lock (Him or Her, your choice) Up

 

How's that? Get your juices flowing, does it? Puts a stop to that ennui?

 

You can use all caps like your messiah, too. Add some meaning to your life.

 

I believe this site has a block function, so if facts bore you, I won't feel the least bit offended if you use that function and add me to your list. Given that your life must be so full of adventure and rewarding experiences, saving you the time to scroll past my posts might allow you to maximize your enjoyment before your time in this Earthly iteration runs out.

I have no idea what you are talking about.  Get a life. 

[Walker88]

28 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

I have no idea what you are talking about.  Get a life. 

I responded to the wrong post.

 

Apologies.

 

Life is good.

[Walker88]

32 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Because you don't understand the concept of consent vs coercive sex.

 

 

It would seem even a jury determined that trump doesn't understand that, either, as the E Jean Carroll ruling made abundantly clear.

 

According to trump's late 1st wife, trump never seemed to have understood that. Of course, when a guy packing 300 lbs thinks he's a star and a babe magnet, delusion and entitlement are at his core.

[Danderman123]

51 minutes ago, G_Money said:

 

Umm, OK!

 

 

 

 

 

You are conflating political beliefs with which you disagree.

 

Just because someone understands that sexual harassment exists doesn't mean they are a flag burner.

[jerrymahoney]

44 minutes ago, Walker88 said:

these things cannot be denied. NY State law says that using fraudulent accounting for the purpose of influencing an election is a felony.

Denied.

[Danderman123]

5 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

Denied.

Yep.

 

The felony comes when fraudulent accounting is used to conceal a crime.

[jerrymahoney]

3 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Yep.

 

The felony comes when fraudulent accounting is used to conceal a crime.

no

 

[Walker88]

2 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Yep.

 

The felony comes when fraudulent accounting is used to conceal a crime.

AG Bragg stated in one of his news conferences that one such crime is trying to influence an election with the fraudulent accounting.

[Danderman123]

Just now, jerrymahoney said:

no

 

I guess there is never a felony when Trump is involved, per your understanding.