Michael Cohen Takes Center Stage in Trump's Hush Money Trial

[MickGC]

1 hour ago, KhunLA said:

A convicted liar (to Congress) ready to take the stand.   Think OJ trial  ...  should be a short deliberation as well.

 

Some quality testimony, Daniels & her convicted lawyer (if testifying)  ... 

... they're joking right.

 

Who was he lying for? His client, the world's greatest liar asked and paid him to do it. 

[Yagoda]

Id like to see anyone here lay out a ccoherent case that Trump did anything. Nobody can.

 

[Danderman123]

20 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I thought you said there were no facts yet, which is it? 

Nobody cares about your bad memory.

 

The witnesses so far have introduced facts that the Defense has not been able to contest. If there is no defense, the jury has an easy job.

 

 

[Danderman123]

41 minutes ago, KhunLA said:

Don't know where I stated that, but read into and make up whatever you want, as you always do.

So, you think it's appropriate that Trump be judged based on the facts presented at trial.

[Danderman123]

9 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Id like to see anyone here lay out a ccoherent case that Trump did anything. Nobody can.

 

Michael Cohen made an illegal campaign donation, and the Donald covered it up by claiming he paid for legal services.

 

Yes, I know this will trigger @Yellowtail.

[Danderman123]

34 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I never said Trump was innocent.

 

I think it is a made-up crime, that no one has ever been prosecuted for, and Biden's DOJ sent one of their top guys to spin up. 

 

What do you think his is guilty of?

Michael Cohen made an illegal campaign contribution and Trump covered it up.

[scottiejohn]

10 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

So, you think it's appropriate that Trump be judged based on the facts presented at trial.

Of course!  That is what a trial is!

 

[Yellowtail]

15 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Nobody cares about your bad memory.

 

The witnesses so far have introduced facts that the Defense has not been able to contest. If there is no defense, the jury has an easy job.

 

 

What facts? Trump paid Stormy through Cohen to keep quiet. 

[Yellowtail]

12 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

So, you think it's appropriate that Trump be judged based on the facts presented at trial.

What facts? 

[Yellowtail]

8 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Michael Cohen made an illegal campaign contribution and Trump covered it up.

So had Trump paid Stormy directly, there would be no case, correct? 

[0ffshore360]

5 hours ago, Purdey said:

Forgive me if I misunderstood, but I thought the charges were not about paying women to keep quiet but from where the money was illegally diverted. 

No. It was/is  about a combination of illegal book keeping entries to disguise paying off a woman to both : hide information potentially prejudicing voters and illegally enter such payments as campaign expenses doubled in amount to offset the taxable impact to the agent in the deception plus recording said payment as deductible outgoings.

The where is known. It is the how and  why that is the focus of attention.

If there are  Maga  maniacs who think that they are immune to IRS conditions of  audit they dream !

 

[Yagoda]

10 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Michael Cohen made an illegal campaign contribution and Trump covered it up.

No evidence of that has been adduced and even the seriously deranged Trump haters on TV know it. But hey, you are so sure of yourself, show us the proof.

[Yellowtail]

31 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Michael Cohen made an illegal campaign donation, and the Donald covered it up by claiming he paid for legal services.

 

Yes, I know this will trigger @Yellowtail.

Your memory is terrible. How many times do you have to be told it was entered as legal expenses? 

 

Do you still no know the difference? 

 

Trump’s lawyer pays Stormy’s lawyer to influence one party to enter into an NDA with another party, which is legal.

 

Stormy’s lawyer pays Stormy to enter into an NDA with another party, which is legal.

 

An NDA is payment in consideration of a contract, which is legal.

 

Trump pays his lawyer and calls it legal expenses, which is legal.

 

Stormy violates the contract.

 

The state claims it was an illegal campaign contribution.

 

Trump is indicted.

 

 

 

 

[Yellowtail]

23 minutes ago, 0ffshore360 said:

No. It was/is  about a combination of illegal book keeping entries to disguise paying off a woman to both : hide information potentially prejudicing voters and illegally enter such payments as campaign expenses doubled in amount to offset the taxable impact to the agent in the deception plus recording said payment as deductible outgoings.

The where is known. It is the how and  why that is the focus of attention.

If there are  Maga  maniacs who think that they are immune to IRS conditions of  audit they dream !

 

You know even less about this than Danderman

[Chomper Higgot]

The Prosecution have listed only one more witness, which suggests this case might very well go forward to jury deliberations within the next week.

 

 

[0ffshore360]

3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

You know even less about this than Danderman

Oh? Trump's insiderspokesperson now? Possess a hotline to Kontroller Putin's bedside phone ?

Oh wait !  You have "the real laptop" of  every high profile individual ? Amazing !

 

[scottiejohn]

9 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

You know even less about this than Danderman

Are you attending the trial in person?

If not then you know nothing either!

[Yellowtail]

8 minutes ago, 0ffshore360 said:

Oh? Trump's insiderspokesperson now? Possess a hotline to Kontroller Putin's bedside phone ?

Oh wait !  You have "the real laptop" of  every high profile individual ? Amazing !

 

They falsely claimed that Trump: "..and illegally enter such payments as campaign expenses..."  That is simply not true. Even Danderman knows that now. 

[Yellowtail]

43 minutes ago, 0ffshore360 said:

No. It was/is  about a combination of illegal book keeping entries to disguise paying off a woman to both : hide information potentially prejudicing voters

Not a crime

43 minutes ago, 0ffshore360 said:

and illegally enter such payments as campaign expenses

False

43 minutes ago, 0ffshore360 said:

doubled in amount to offset the taxable impact to the agent

Legal

43 minutes ago, 0ffshore360 said:

in the deception plus recording said payment as deductible outgoings.

False claim

43 minutes ago, 0ffshore360 said:

The where is known. It is the how and  why that is the focus of attention.

If there are  Maga  maniacs who think that they are immune to IRS conditions of  audit they dream !

Trump did not deduct the payments, or lest them on any tax forms. 

 

But yes, he will be convicted, because of people like you. 

 

 

[Chomper Higgot]

13 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

But yes, he will be convicted, because of people like you. 

 

I’m rather hoping he will be convicted.

 

But that will be down to the Jury non of whom I know or know anything about, I doubt you don’t know them either.

 

So it will come down to the evidence, the testimony and what the Jury make of it all.

As I have said many times, I will accept the Jury’s verdict and yes you can hold me to that.

 

I do hope we get a bit of notice before the verdict is handed down, I need to retune my TV to get FOX News for the occasion.

[Yellowtail]

3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’m rather hoping he will be convicted.

 

But that will be down to the Jury non of whom I know or know anything about, I doubt you don’t know them either.

 

So it will come down to the evidence, the testimony and what the Jury make of it all.

As I have said many times, I will accept the Jury’s verdict and yes you can hold me to that.

 

I do hope we get a bit of notice before the verdict is handed down, I need to retune my TV to get FOX News for the occasion.

It will come down to the judge's jury instructions. 

[eisfeld]

1 hour ago, Danderman123 said:

Michael Cohen made an illegal campaign donation, and the Donald covered it up by claiming he paid for legal services.

 

Yes, I know this will trigger @Yellowtail.

 

Don't bother, Yagoda is a troll. Asking for someone to lay out a case against Trump on a topic about a case being run against Trump...

[scottiejohn]

8 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

It will come down to the judge's jury instructions. 

It will come down to the jury's decision!

[frank83628]

10 hours ago, TorquayFan said:

 

 

It's a source of amazement to me that Trump has any supporters left. 

 

Wake up !

 

 

and your answer is in that sentence...it's because you are so out of touch with why people like him. 

[G_Money]

14 hours ago, Tug said:

It’s been a busy day in trump world lol 😂 I was personally delighted when the prosecutor was reading trump tweets praising cohen then when cohen turned states evidence of course trumps tweets changed it had the entire court laughing…..then there is Trump trying to delay payment because if he lost it dident matter but if he won he didn’t care.another words obviously he doesn’t care how his wife feels about it quell surprise ……..what a specimen!

And how much of this gibberish is admissible as fact.  0%
 

All coming from a bloke who thinks he can outrun a perp with a knife set on filleting him like a salmon.  Good luck.

[G_Money]

1 hour ago, Danderman123 said:

Michael Cohen made an illegal campaign contribution and Trump covered it up.

Torpedo man fire the number 4 tube.

[scottiejohn]

3 minutes ago, G_Money said:

And how much of this gibberish is admissible as fact.  0%
 

All coming from a bloke who thinks he can outrun a perp with a knife set on filleting him like a salmon.  Good luck.

How much of the above gibberish makes any sense to anyone apart from you?

[G_Money]

24 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’m rather hoping he will be convicted.

 

But that will be down to the Jury non of whom I know or know anything about, I doubt you don’t know them either.

 

So it will come down to the evidence, the testimony and what the Jury make of it all.

As I have said many times, I will accept the Jury’s verdict and yes you can hold me to that.

 

I do hope we get a bit of notice before the verdict is handed down, I need to retune my TV to get FOX News for the occasion.

Hope is all you have left.  Similar to Obama’s “Hope and Change “

 

I agree with the rest.  It’s comes down to the jury.  Right decision or wrong decision.  It’s the American way.
 

Wise choice with Fox News.  Nice to see you progressing out of the rabbit hole.  
 

Good night and sweet dreams.

 

 

[G_Money]

11 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

How much of the above gibberish makes any sense to anyone apart from you?

Still upset you didn’t make my shortlist for Danderman to refer to for clarification?

 

Don't hate.  It doesn’t fit in with the core values of liberalism.

 

You just weren’t qualified!  I don’t do DEI, EEO or any of that other WOKE BS.

[Chomper Higgot]

10 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Hope is all you have left.  Similar to Obama’s “Hope and Change “

 

I agree with the rest.  It’s comes down to the jury.  Right decision or wrong decision.  It’s the American way.
 

Wise choice with Fox News.  Nice to see you progressing out of the rabbit hole.  
 

Good night and sweet dreams.

 

 

Odd that you mention Obama.

 

I tuned into FOX News for both his Presidential Election wins. 
 

Unmissable TV.

 

 

Edited May 14 by Chomper Higgot