Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 hours ago, Mavideol said:

he does need more of meat feeder for the canons, since the Indians decided to leave, any race is welcome, the fatter the better 555

'First Step To World War': Ukraine Claims North Korea Is Looking To Send 10,000 Troops To Help Putin

https://au.yahoo.com/news/first-steps-world-war-ukraine-142407964.html

 

Well, it is OK when beloved friends help each other! Native Russian speakers in Yakutia or Buryatia look exactly the same as people from Democratic Korea. Therefore, they will feel comfortable in Vladimir Putin's army.

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, Mavideol said:

Opinion - Russian ‘milblogger’ worries about a pro-Ukrainian fifth column

https://au.yahoo.com/news/opinion-russian-milblogger-worries-pro-170000288.html

 

"Aside from the fact that the list is effectively a how-to guide telling the Russian opposition what they should do to fight Putin’s regime,..."
Yes! This is the most interesting part. This military blogger also liked to tell the public about the exact location of Russian troops and their movements. Of course, he was naive enough to simply not know what would follow. It took Putin two years to stop allowing such people into combat zones.

  • Haha 2
Posted

Given that in 2023 the UK spent 4.3 billion pounds on asylum seekers and that the Ukrainian armed forces are short of manpower it would be useful to both the UK and Ukraine if all the asylum seekers were sent to fight for Kiev.  Talk about kill two birds with one stone !  For those that serve an insentive could be given. Full pay ( they want to work don't they ) plus a bonus that they can take back home with them when the war is over. Win win .

 

My point is that in the event of a cut in funding from the USA Ukraine should not be abandoned to its fate for want of cash. Billions are being spent all over Europe dealing with asylum claimants. Why should'nt they fight for the right to remain in Europe. ?

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 hour ago, zmisha said:

You probably have some kind of profession. How do you feel about newbies with zero experience in your profession? They are a burden, aren't they? It's the same with volunteers without combat experience. A military career is very similar to any other. People without experience are a burden there - any military man will tell you that.

 

A modern military is 90% about logistics.

Warehousing, transports, driving, inventory management, personnel management, intendance, supplies, food, medical .... a large majority of military jobs are not combat roles.

 

I also do believe that a deal should be struck with potential recruits - their family gets well cared for while they serve in the military - with an appropriate compensation that covers their family's future in case of their injury or death.

 

Form reserve bataillons, train them for 6 months and then assign them as reserve/training units to existing fighting units so they can at first fill support roles and learn the ropes and replace losses.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, zmisha said:

You probably have some kind of profession. How do you feel about newbies with zero experience in your profession? They are a burden, aren't they? It's the same with volunteers without combat experience. A military career is very similar to any other. People without experience are a burden there - any military man will tell you that.

 

True indeed. But their is thing called training these days. 6 weeks drilling , first aid,weapons and tactics. All armies have this. Even Ukrainian troops were sent to the UK for combat training.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Denim said:

Given that in 2023 the UK spent 4.3 billion pounds on asylum seekers and that the Ukrainian armed forces are short of manpower it would be useful to both the UK and Ukraine if all the asylum seekers were sent to fight for Kiev.  Talk about kill two birds with one stone !  For those that serve an insentive could be given. Full pay ( they want to work don't they ) plus a bonus that they can take back home with them when the war is over. Win win .

 

My point is that in the event of a cut in funding from the USA Ukraine should not be abandoned to its fate for want of cash. Billions are being spent all over Europe dealing with asylum claimants. Why should'nt they fight for the right to remain in Europe. ?

 

4 hours ago, tgw said:

 

A modern military is 90% about logistics.

Warehousing, transports, driving, inventory management, personnel management, intendance, supplies, food, medical .... a large majority of military jobs are not combat roles.

 

I also do believe that a deal should be struck with potential recruits - their family gets well cared for while they serve in the military - with an appropriate compensation that covers their family's future in case of their injury or death.

 

Form reserve bataillons, train them for 6 months and then assign them as reserve/training units to existing fighting units so they can at first fill support roles and learn the ropes and replace losses.

Seems like the Hope strategy is being replaced by the Desperation strategy.

  • Confused 3
Posted
Just now, tgw said:

let's ask North Korea for help 🤣

Actually, there’s no evidence of NK troops. Even Mark Rutte said as much. It’s just western propaganda.

  • Confused 2
  • Haha 1
Posted

It should be a "weapons free" from the US, but with an election in a little more than 2 weeks I don't think there will be any action other than a statement saying that this is bad

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...