Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, sidneybear said:

You forgot to mention the Islamic world, or do you support the LGBTQIA faction of the same Saudi government that the US is always pandering to?

I didn't forget. Islamic rhetoric is different. 

  • Confused 1
Posted
Just now, Jingthing said:

I didn't forget. Islamic rhetoric is different. 

They throw gays off buildings and lock them up. Why don't they get a mention?

Posted
5 minutes ago, sidneybear said:

They throw gays off buildings and lock them up. Why don't they get a mention?

Not every post needs to be about everything in the world. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Not every post needs to be about everything in the world. 

Your Kremlin posts were about just that. 

Posted
On 6/3/2024 at 8:23 AM, BKKKevin said:


Why does this stupid drivel come out every time we discuss gay marriage? 

That question is easily answered by looking at the authors of said drivel.  If Michelin awarded stars for the world's finest drivel we know who'd get them.

Posted
20 hours ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

There it is again - exactly the lefty thinking - you dont care about Lia Thomas and what she/he did to others - downsides of so many things that came about under the banner of 'gay rights'.

Let me tell you - She/he won National swimming championship events against 'biological females' thereby destroying their years of work and efforts.  She/he was allowed to get changed (full male genitalia on display) in the girl's change rooms, despite their protests. The girl's that protested were told they must accept 'her' in there, because she was accepted as a female competitor, or they would be suspended. What they had to do was change in the toilets with the door closed, and other things to avoid her/him. 

I think the point most people are TRYING to point out to you is you are bringing up a different issue to the same sex marriage topic of this post, but more importantly, YOUR point was resolved nearly 2 years ago.

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world-swimming-bans-transgender-athletes-womens-events-rcna34325

 

and it's not just swimmming

 

https://www.npr.org/2024/04/08/1243548261/naia-transgender-athlete-sports-ban

https://www.bbc.com/sport/athletics/65051900

Posted
42 minutes ago, sidneybear said:

Your Kremlin posts were about just that. 

Get a grip.

No they weren't.

I was responding to your extremist anti LGBT rhetoric and pointing out it was both right wing western AND fascist Kremlin. Which is the reason I don't believe that you're a Thai.

Never heard such garbage from a Thai.

Maybe and only just maybe you became a Thai citizen. In that case you should be honest about your background and not play act as if you're speaking for Thais.

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Get a grip.

No they weren't.

I was responding to your extremist anti LGBT rhetoric and pointing out it was both right wing western AND fascist Kremlin. Which is the reason I don't believe that you're a Thai.

Never heard such garbage from a Thai.

Maybe and only just maybe you became a Thai citizen. In that case you should be honest about your background and not play act as if you're speaking for Thais.

You just can't face the fact that Thais find your soulless American culture and fads repulsive. Thankfully, Thailand has checks and balances to prevent vile Western dogma such as the "Pride" castration cult from taking root here like a cancer. Even in the Western world, people are getting sick of it: if people want to do gay sex, fine, but why do we have to celebrate it and mutilate children?

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, sidneybear said:

You just can't face the fact that Thais find your soulless American culture and fads repulsive. Thankfully, Thailand has checks and balances to prevent vile Western dogma such as the "Pride" castration cult from taking root here like a cancer. Even in the Western world, people are getting sick of it: if people want to do gay sex, fine, but why do we have to celebrate it and mutilate children?

Yeah, you represent Thais.

That's the ticket.

Do you take readers here for morons?

  • Sad 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Jingthing said:

The magical meaningless insult word of moronic right wing reactionaries.

The ignorant useless insults of idiotic left wing ideologists.

(have we had enough yet?)

Posted
1 minute ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

The ignorant useless insults of idiotic left wing ideologists.

(have we had enough yet?)

I don't consider myself left wing but you're free to post all the stupid stuff you like. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

I don't consider myself left wing but you're free to post all the stupid stuff you like. 

Oh do tell us of any traits that make you anything other than left wing. This should be fun.

Posted
1 hour ago, sidneybear said:

Oh do tell us of any traits that make you anything other than left wing. This should be fun.

Too off topic.

Posted
1 hour ago, Jingthing said:

Too off topic.

First you attack people who don't agree with you, labelling them as "far right". Then you say that you aren't left wing. Now you don't want to talk about it.

 

You're so full of it.

Posted
3 hours ago, Jingthing said:

I don't consider myself left wing but you're free to post all the stupid stuff you like. 

I remember you being a rabid lefty Trump hater and all things woke back in 2016. 

They say all things change - so you changed? 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

A post that breaks community standards removed.

 

Rule 9 - You will not post disruptive or inflammatory messages. You will respect other members and post in a civil manner. Personal attacks, insults or hate speech posted on the forum or sent by private message are not allowed.

 

Posted
1 minute ago, sidneybear said:

The source of the poll is Glaad, so I think we can safely throw that one away. 🤣🤣🤣

" sourced by Cint (who has the world’s largest consumer network for digital survey-based research). Data were weighted to ensure results represent the adult 18+ U.S. population."

 

Now who am I going to believe, Cint or some bloke on the internet? 🙂 

Posted
19 minutes ago, Baht Simpson said:

" sourced by Cint (who has the world’s largest consumer network for digital survey-based research). Data were weighted to ensure results represent the adult 18+ U.S. population."

 

Now who am I going to believe, Cint or some bloke on the internet? 🙂 

Glad publishes a survey to show support for Pride . ... bwaaahhhaaahhhaa

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 6/9/2024 at 9:26 AM, Expat Rob said:

So did allowing interracial marriage lead to the inner-city riots in the U.S. in the 60

Allowing... Good grief. Land of the free, home of the brave...

Posted
On 6/10/2024 at 7:40 PM, Baht Simpson said:

represent the adult 18+ U.S. population."

Not adult enough to drink alcohol, though. Land of the free, etc...

Posted
On 6/9/2024 at 2:06 PM, champers said:

Apart from anything else, making Thailand a safe haven for same sex couples is a no brainer economically.

I really can't wait until the first gay foreign guy marries a gay Thai guy and then wants the same path to citizenship that is offered to foreign women married to Thai men plus not being burden with any financial requirements other than contributing to his husband's 20K / month financial requirement his husband will need to meet. 

And then the shrieks of horror when the first gay foreign woman marries a gay Thai women and is forced to maintain the 40K/month or 400K in a Thai bank financials in order to "visit her wife during her one year extension of stay - as well as having no path to citizenship.

Yeah baby - that's gonna but interesting to watch!  :thumbsup:  Stand by!

Posted
14 minutes ago, connda said:

I really can't wait until the first gay foreign guy marries a gay Thai guy and then wants the same path to citizenship that is offered to foreign women married to Thai men plus not being burden with any financial requirements other than contributing to his husband's 20K / month financial requirement his husband will need to meet. 

The foreigners sex doesn't change, so the rules stay the same.

A gay marriage has 2x wives, or 2x husbands.

Posted
4 minutes ago, connda said:

I really can't wait until the first gay foreign guy marries a gay Thai guy and then wants the same path to citizenship that is offered to foreign women married to Thai men plus not being burden with any financial requirements other than contributing to his husband's 20K / month financial requirement his husband will need to meet. 

And then the shrieks of horror when the first gay foreign woman marries a gay Thai women and is forced to maintain the 40K/month or 400K in a Thai bank financials in order to "visit her wife during her one year extension of stay - as well as having no path to citizenship.

Yeah baby - that's gonna but interesting to watch!  :thumbsup:  Stand by!


I wonder when it will occur to Srettha and his merry band of progressives who all are clapping each other on the backs for being so in turn with rainbow liberalism with suddenly the facts smack them in the face?  What are they gonna do?  Tell their citizens that only gay Thais can marry their same sex?  That same sex marriage will not be an option for foreign couples who wish to get married?  I absolutely guarantee, know Thais and their inability to plan into the future, that this hasn't ever crossed their radar yet.  And when it does, they are probably going to make a lot of people very unhappy with the slap-trap way the end up handling the issue because it will not have been thought out.  It will be 100% reactive.  I'm leaning toward that the Thai government will only allow gay Thai citizen to marry other same-sex gay Thai citizens, after which all of this hype that "Thailand will go further than legalising same-sex marriage" will be seen as more of the typical hot-air emanating from government house that ends up being all promises and no delivery.  Why?  The LBGT+ community is global, and as such when Thailand says it's legalizing "same-sex marriage," the global LBGT+ community is going to react, and when those promises are found to be empty bovine excrement, the reaction by the global LBGT+ community will not be pleasant. Imho.

Posted
11 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

The foreigners sex doesn't change, so the rules stay the same.

A gay marriage has 2x wives, or 2x husbands.

So 1 foreign wife married to 1 Thai wife - for Immigration purposes - how can the foreign wife stay with her Thai wife?

And 1 foreign husband married to 1 Thai husband - for Immigration purposes - how can the foreign husband stay with his Thai husband?

There are no rules in place at the moment to cover either of these situations, so new rules will need to be developed and put into law.

I'm just saying - I can see the potential for a serious cluster-foxtrot on the horizon here when it comes to Immigration because as it stand, Thai Immigration has two completely different standards for a foreign man married to a Thai woman, and a foreign woman married to a Thai man. 
What are they gonna do? 

And then - what about transvestites?  Aren't they the "Go Further" of the "Thailand will go further than legalising same-sex marriage?"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...