Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

IMO, first term she'll mostly keep the number of illegals flooding in low. The focus will be on getting S.4361 passed, building up processing capacity and getting everyone in the country illegally legalized, subsidized and on a path to citizenship. 

 

IMO, the second term border is wide open again but legalizing and subsidizing them (per S.4361) as they come in. 

The real problem for Usa and many other western countries, the birth rate is to low, and as many who emigrates to Us, the same amount migrates from Us. 

 

The emigration problem, is just a temporary problem, not a real problem, because the real problems doesnt really surface in all this noise

Posted
3 minutes ago, Hummin said:

The real problem for Usa and many other western countries, the birth rate is to low, and as many who emigrates to Us, the same amount migrates from Us. 

 

The emigration problem, is just a temporary problem, not a real problem, because the real problems doesnt really surface in all this noise

I am not clear what you are saying. People typically do not emigrate from the US. They emigrate from other countries and immigrate in the US. 

 

If what you are saying is that the problem is temporary in that at some point, mass illegal immigration will result in the US becoming such a sh*thole that no one wants to come, I guess that is possible, but I do not think we are anywhere near that point yet. 

 

 

  • Confused 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I am not clear what you are saying. People typically do not emigrate from the US. They emigrate from other countries and immigrate in the US. 

 

If what you are saying is that the problem is temporary in that at some point, mass illegal immigration will result in the US becoming such a sh*thole that no one wants to come, I guess that is possible, but I do not think we are anywhere near that point yet. 

 

 

 

Illegal settling is the norm in Us 😉

Posted
1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

IMO, first term she'll mostly keep the number of illegals flooding in low. The focus will be on getting S.4361 passed, building up processing capacity and getting everyone in the country illegally legalized, subsidized and on a path to citizenship. 

 

IMO, the second term border is wide open again but legalizing and subsidizing them (per S.4361) as they come in. 

 

 

....and the sole purpose of letting these illegals flood in is to help maximise the profits of billionaire Democrats?

 

Is that correct?

Posted
17 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

....and the sole purpose of letting these illegals flood in is to help maximise the profits of billionaire Democrats?

 

Is that correct?

No, that is not correct. What gave you that idea? 

  • Confused 1
Posted
Just now, Yellowtail said:

No, that is not correct. What gave you that idea? 

 

 

Just a recollection from a poster saying that was why the Dems let illegals in........so why do they let them in?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

Just a recollection from a poster saying that was why the Dems let illegals in........so why do they let them in?

Are they still letting them in?

  • Confused 1
Posted
Just now, Yellowtail said:

Are they still letting them in?

 

 

The impression I have reading posts on here is that they were flooding in....... thousands every week. No?

Posted
Just now, Will B Good said:

 

 

The impression I have reading posts on here is that they were flooding in....... thousands every week. No?

Yes, they were. What's your point?

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

Yes, they were. What's your point?

 

 

Okay I will rephrase.....why did the Dems allow illegals to flood in? 

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

Okay I will rephrase.....why did the Dems allow illegals to flood in? 

 

Because they grow the economy, benefit the rich, and create more dependence on government. 

 

"Demography is Destiny"

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 8/23/2024 at 6:42 AM, earlinclaifornia said:

Any person comparing the two parties enthusiasm are not close to comparrison

So true

Screenshot_20240904_064134_Chrome.jpg

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

this maybe. and all the dems call trump a dictator

Screenshot 2024-09-10 at 11.17.51.png

 

 

Oh gerrymandering......I can see the logic assuming they are all...or most of them.....kind enough to vote Dem.

 

Good idea.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, maesariang said:

South African trying to save America.

 

 

Lone Skum......I wonder if his parents had a sense of humour?

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Will B Good said:

 

 

Oh gerrymandering......I can see the logic assuming they are all...or most of them.....kind enough to vote Dem.

 

Good idea.

i'd imagine they'd show gratitude to those letting them stay, rather than those wanting them out

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, frank83628 said:

i'd imagine they'd show gratitude to those letting them stay, rather than those wanting them out

And those promising them benefits and bringing in their family members and countrymen. 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 7/26/2024 at 7:42 PM, steven100 said:

She's good in lower positions I expect ...

 

But now she's way out of her depth  .....    period.

 

 

and anybody who can't see that is delusional

Looks like that turned out well for you Steve .....are you OK  ??????

  • Love It 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...