Jump to content

Urgent Calls for Stricter Controls on Dangerous Dogs after Fatal Attacks


Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, NorthernRyland said:

but maybe they have bad karma and Buddha demands their sacrifice.

Seems you don't really understand, Buddha never demands a sacrifice. 

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Artisi said:

Seeking a new home, unbelievable! 

Do they have a special temple to take these dogs to?or maybe give them to the military for attitude adjustment. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, MalcolmB said:

No such thing as a bad dog breed.

Only bad owners.

or bad chefs  if you live in certain areas

Posted
53 minutes ago, Artisi said:

Seems you don't really understand, Buddha never demands a sacrifice.

well I was just joking but yes I don't understand either. So these Thai people are going to put this killer dog in a new home and if it kills again isn't that just bad karma, i.e. the person deserved to die?

 

In their religion who or what dictates who deserves to die? I'm assuming this must be the reason because why would any sane person look for a new home for a dog that killed. Even 80 IQ farmers with brain damage from rice whiskey wouldn't do this.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

The only "control" required comes in a syringe, and works very quickly

Or a gun, more safer than a syringe

Posted
4 hours ago, webfact said:

In response, the Thai Agriculture and Cooperatives Ministry plans to introduce regulations by early next year, focusing on securely containing dangerous dogs and enforcing stringent handling measures.

 

Is that what they call URGENT controls...............:coffee1:

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
2 hours ago, hotchilli said:

Loving good natured family pets, looking for a new owner....

Will love your family to death.............opps to soon?

Posted
34 minutes ago, NorthernRyland said:

well I was just joking but yes I don't understand either. So these Thai people are going to put this killer dog in a new home and if it kills again isn't that just bad karma, i.e. the person deserved to die?

 

In their religion who or what dictates who deserves to die? I'm assuming this must be the reason because why would any sane person look for a new home for a dog that killed. Even 80 IQ farmers with brain damage from rice whiskey wouldn't do this.

This is why some poison dogs they can say I didn't kill it, buddha let it eat....... 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, fredwiggy said:

He spoiled that dog until it felt it was in charge

Yes, being kind to a dog is being a bad owner.

You have to show them who is boss and how they are to behave.

Bad owners are not  bad people, they think they are doing the right thing but instead are creating a bad dog.

 

You have to be cruel to be kind. 
same with raising children, spare the rod, spoil the child.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 3
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...