Russian Disinformation Campaign Targets Kamala Harris with False Accusations

[johng]

17 hours ago, billd766 said:

Trump doesn't seem to like fact checking and neither do you.

 

Neither do I  as they are often bogus,disingenuous, biased and often proven some time later to have been totally incorrect and have to retract after the damage to someone's reputation has been done...too late then eyy ? ohh well never mind  mission accomplished.

[billd766]

32 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

As I already posted, everything she said in the debate that wasn't fact-checked

Same old, same old tired and worn out BS from you

 

So in fact, you have NO facts, no proof of anything at all.

 

Hence the question.

 

Specifically what lies did Kamala Harris say and can YOU prove it was a lie?

[Liverpool Lou]

4 minutes ago, billd766 said:

 

Specifically what lies did Kamala Harris say and can YOU prove it was a lie?

I cannot be any more specific, I said everything.   It can be proven by simply listening to the debate.    Can YOU prove that anything she said was true?

[billd766]

27 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

I cannot be any more specific, I said everything.   It can be proven by simply listening to the debate.    Can YOU prove that anything she said was true?

I don't have to prove anything.

 

You claimed it.

 

You own it.

 

YOU prove it, otherwise YOU are just posting lies and disinformation.

[tgw]

57 minutes ago, johng said:

Well for one the "fine people on both sides"   lie

for two  the "bloodbath" lie.

 

well, don't you think the first one is true ?

there are people in the GOP that don't support MAGA.

 

#2 - I agree that the "bloodbath" quote is being deliberately misinterpreted and spinned.
but on the other hand it would have required a clarification by Trump and when doing such a clarification he could have made the people misrepresenting that quote look very silly. he didn't clarify. huh.

[johng]

19 minutes ago, tgw said:

well, don't you think the first one is true ?

No its not true at all go look at the video   he specifically rules out Neo Nazis as "good people"   I have no idea what GOP not supporting MAGA has to do with it ?

 

22 minutes ago, tgw said:

he could have made the people misrepresenting that quote look very silly

He and his supporters know that those misrepresenting him on all fronts are very silly and so probably saw no need to point it out,  but yes I think it was a missed opportunity.

[billd766]

7 hours ago, johng said:

 

Neither do I  as they are often bogus,disingenuous, biased and often proven some time later to have been totally incorrect and have to retract after the damage to someone's reputation has been done...too late then eyy ? ohh well never mind  mission accomplished.

If anybody want to fact check my posts then they are welcome. If I get something wrong then please let me know and I will check it myself. If I am wrong, then I will apologise and not repeat it again.

 

[bendejo]

10 hours ago, johng said:

 

Well for one the "fine people on both sides"   lie

for two  the "bloodbath" lie.

 

Oops!  Those are both terms DT has used.  You seem to have trouble telling them apart, so just remember Harris is the one with the dark hair.

 

[connda]

It worked out so well in 2016, let roll out the "Ruskies Are Stealing The Election For Trump" again!!!

"We all HATE Trump,
We all HATE Trump,
So let's take a DUMP,
On Donald J. Trump."  💩

Wash, Rinse, Repeat!
🧔‍♀️"I'm Hillary Clinton and I endorse this message!"

[frank83628]

On 9/19/2024 at 8:30 PM, Patong2021 said:

The comments  on this topic are certainly  supporting the allegations of intentional lying from the Trump collective.

 

Russian misinformation activities are exposed and credible evidence is provided.

Patriotic Americans would be aghast and  concerned to see the extent of Russian sabotage and infiltration, and the sad reality of  American complicity in the sabotage.  Instead, the Trump supporters come out, to swarm and to distract from the Russian  sabotage. All sorts of unrelated references are made.

Not one of the Trump supporters is upset or concerned by the Russian interference. This then gives rise to the  sincere conclusion that these people are neither loyal Americans, nor, and most likely in some cases,  American nationals. Instead they have put the political goals of Russia and Putin first and foremost. 

credible evidence is provided my arse! nobody but the derangement posse believe that. it amazes me just how gullible you old gits are.

[stoner]

On 9/20/2024 at 2:54 PM, bendejo said:

On 9/20/2024 at 4:44 AM, johng said:

 

Well for one the "fine people on both sides"   lie

for two  the "bloodbath" lie.

 

Oops!  Those are both terms DT has used.  You seem to have trouble telling them apart, so just remember Harris is the one with the dark hair.

 

you are either willfully obtuse or being totally disingenuous. 

 

johng was explaining in clear detail the misconceptions pushed over those comments that trump DID make. 

 

you seem to have trouble as well. 

[Patong2021]

1 hour ago, frank83628 said:

credible evidence is provided my arse! nobody but the derangement posse believe that. it amazes me just how gullible you old gits are.

 

What information is not reliable? According to you, every western nation who has caught and exposed the Russian disinformation activities  is lying.  Aside from the US  security services and private company reports are the  very detailed EU and Canadian reports.

 

Have you read this European documentation? it is a sobering expose of Russian sabotage.  https://www.disinfo.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Doppelganger-1.pdf

 

The main narratives pushed by the disinformation campaign and its agents and enablers are;

-the ineffectiveness of sanctions against Russia;

- the alleged Russophobia of Western states;

- the supposed predominance of Nazi ideology among Ukrainian officials; and

- the negative effects of welcoming Ukrainian refugees for European countries.

 

And not surprising, all are common themes in the writings of some people on AN.

[Seth1a2a]

On 9/18/2024 at 7:13 PM, mdr224 said:

Democrats winning in 2020 is what allowed him to attack in the first place.

 

Seriously ?  Are you saying Trump would have tried to stop  Putin from attacking Ukraine ? 

Considering the way Trump was gushing like a schoolgirl about Putin's invasion plans ,  it's

more likely that he would have committed U.S. resources to help Russia  instead .

 

 

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-putin-savvy-genius/

Fact Check

Yes, Trump Called Putin's Ukraine Strategy 'Savvy' and 'Genius'

 

https://www.newsweek.com/trump-praise-putin-smart-war-ukraine-invasion-1682182

Donald Trump Praises 'Very Smart' Putin