Jump to content

Polish Passenger Threatens to Bomb Plane Mid-air on Flight to Bangkok


Georgealbert

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Georgealbert said:

Following the investigation, it was determined that the woman had not intended to carry out an act of terrorism or actually plant a bomb. Her statement was deemed a violation of aviation security regulations but without malicious intent. Thai VietJet has decided not to press charges, and the passenger is set to depart Thailand to return to Poland.

 

What the Fark, no Wai and a 500 baht fine, she got off lighter than the Thai's do, IMO 🙂

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


12 hours ago, SingAPorn said:

Why on earth did this wacked polish female do such a stupid thing ? Drugs or to much booze ?

 

Hope she is deported and banned from the kingdom for 30 years as she is a threat to public peace.

 

She needs banging up, not deporting!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Georgealbert said:

UPDATE
 

Thai VietJet Declines to Press Charges Against Polish Woman for Bomb Threat, Set to Return Home Tonight

 

Thai VietJet has announced during the evening of September 26, that it will not pursue legal action against a 34-year-old Polish woman who made a bomb threat while on board a flight from Da Nang, Vietnam, to Suvarnabhumi Airport in Bangkok. The woman is scheduled to leave Thailand and return to Poland over night on September 26.

 

 

 

 

I thought airlines in general were very strict about bomb threats and evening saying the worde "bomb" out aloud could cause reactions from the staff.

 

This is a dangerous precedence - not punishing her. Imagine the chaos if people start making empty bomb threats.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, renaissanc said:

I don't know what the circumstances were, but most probably common sense and compassion prevailed. I know many expats here will now scream and complain vociferously to the heavens that I referred to compassion. Still, compassion and unconditional love are perhaps the core values and qualities that are missing most in people, companies, and the world. What a difference they can make!

 

Oh, come now... there there... You only scared the s*!t out of 121 passengers and crew, inconvenienced them all for a couple of hours during a baggage search, invoked a security nightmare, and possibly put someone off ever flying again due to your pathetic hoax, but it's OK, everyone loves you and be on your merry way.

 

Yeah, whatever snowflake! You're part of the problem that enables these morons!

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Georgealbert said:

Her statement was deemed a violation of aviation security regulations but without malicious intent. Thai VietJet has decided not to press charges

The legal authority is Thailand police, not Thai VietJet.

According to Thailand's law on offences committed against air navigation, anyone who knowingly communicates false information causing panic on an aircraft in flight is liable to imprisonment for up to 5 years or a fine of US$6,150 on conviction.

"Without malicious intent" does not negate that a crime was committed nor does it mitigate possible passenger panic (whether outward or inward). Only that the penalty under the law  can be mitigated.

As such I'd think the Thai police on its own initiative can and must charge the subject Polish woman. An out of court plea bargain stemming from the woman's admission to the crime can conclude for example a fine, deportation, etc.

What appears to me is that potentially Thai VietJet by giving the subject woman a "pass" was looking out for its own financial position. Ask yourself this: Will Thailand police accepting Thai VietJet's absolution of a possible Thailand federal crime deter future similar crimes?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know the seats are cramped on the airplane lady but that is taking it to far.

 

It is to late now but how about making her stand at an arriving gate and say "Sorry" to each and

every passenger as they depart the flight at a minimum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Viet jet will not be prosecuting the woman? If the threat was enough to involve the authorities and activate emergency procedures and  possibly causing distress to all the passengers then action should most definitely have been taken if not by the airline then the respective air authorities. She made the threat and is immediately allowed on another aircraft. Id make her travel back by either road or sea as a lesson. Cant mess about with bomb word in this day and age

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or was there a mistake in translation?

 

I feel that if she had really made a terrorist threat, the airline would have felt obliged to pursue all necessary legal and court action.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, renaissanc said:

We don't know what happened. Maybe she was drunk or was having an emotional argument with her spouse and said it by mistake or to annoy him, and what she said was overheard by a flight attendant.

According to the OP:

......the bomb threat, which was reportedly made via a mobile phone....... 

🙄

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, 4MyEgo said:

 

What the Fark, no Wai and a 500 baht fine, she got off lighter than the Thai's do, IMO 🙂

 

 

Not to mention foreigners who commit the apparently far more serious crime of missing a 90-day report!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Georgealbert said:

IMG_6054.jpeg
Picture of the passenger detained at Suvarnabhumi.

 

The incident unfolded on September 26, aboard VZ 961, a Thai Vietjet flight traveling from Da Nang to Suvarnabhumi International Airport, when a Polish woman, identified as Ms. Myrcik, allegedly threatened to bomb the plane mid-flight. The flight had 121 passengers and six crew members on board.

 

At approximately 14:45 the captain of the aircraft informed Suvarnabhumi ATC (air traffic control) about the bomb threat, which was reportedly made via a mobile phone. Authorities immediately activated emergency action plans and protocols to ensure the safety of the aircraft, airport, passengers and crew.

 

 

 


Upon receiving the threat, officials at Suvarnabhumi prepared for an emergency landing and directed the plane to Isolated Parking 1, a designated safe zone for such incidents. After landing in Bangkok, a tactical response team swiftly separated passengers, crew, and baggage for a thorough search. Ms. Myrcik was promptly detained and handed over to Suvarnabhumi police for questioning.

 

Despite the gravity of the threat, which turned out to be false,  airport officials praised the captain and ground crew for their composed and professional handling of the situation. The quick response ensured that there was no panic among the passengers, and operations at Suvarnabhumi Airport continued without disruption.

 

According to the Aviation Offenses Act, B.E. 2558 (2015), Section 22, anyone who knowingly makes a false statement or sends false information that causes or is likely to cause alarm to passengers aboard an aircraft in flight shall be subject to imprisonment for no more than 5 years, a fine of up to 200,000 baht (two hundred thousand baht), or both.

 

If the act causes danger to the safety of the aircraft while in flight, the offender shall be subject to imprisonment for 5 to 15 years or a fine ranging from 200,000 baht (two hundred thousand baht) to 600,000 baht (six hundred thousand baht), or both.


Thai VietJet Official Statement
 

Thai VietJet clarified the facts regarding a bomb threat on a flight, which turned out to be false.

 

The incident occurred on flight VZ961 from Da Nang to Suvarnabhumi Airport, Bangkok. The crew received a report from a foreign passenger claiming there was an explosive device on board. The crew immediately followed safety procedures and contacted security personnel at the destination airport.

 

After the flight landed safely, the aircraft was moved to a designated secure area as specified by the airport for a thorough inspection of passengers and luggage. The passengers were then escorted to the terminal in an orderly manner. Relevant authorities also conducted a detailed safety check of the aircraft.

 

IMG_6057.jpeg


 

news-logo-btm.jpg

-- 2024-09-26

 

Cigna Banner (500x100) (1).png

 

image.png

Unfortuneately headline doesnt match the story says it was a false complaint per the story 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Montnoveau said:

 

Yes, looks like a case of misunderstanding or miscommunication, which is too embarrassing for them.

Yes, very likely. Lost in translation, obviously. 

Asian but Polish woman said something in %what language% so vietnamese flight attendant took as the threat. Later when semi-sober Ambassador arrived he translated what did she mean "in fact really"

Embarrassing indeed!

 

PS: Polish citizenship is about 10K Euro through that UA hole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now








×
×
  • Create New...
""